Abstract
This chapter scrutinizes the fragmentation of the OIC aid system. It is argued that this fragmentation is a result of the asymmetrical intergovernmental relationship between a small number of aid donors (notably the hydrocarbon-rich Gulf States) and a large and increasing pool of aid recipients. The chapter illustrates that this process is empowered by the asymmetrical setting of the OIC (there are very few donors with whom to compete), donors have “bilateralized” the multilateral by supporting their own “aid recipients”. This has progressively fragmented the OIC aid system. In parallel, because borrowers and aid recipients dominate the OIC arena numerically, their increasing demands have enhanced donor organization proliferation, to the detriment of a cohesive OIC aid system. The combination of these two trends explains why the OIC system is fragmented, structurally underfunded, and difficult to reform. These consequences constitute a challenge that the OIC must address going forward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The ISFD was to “(a) reduce poverty, (b) build the productive capacities of member countries, (c) reduce illiteracy, and (d) eradicate diseases and epidemics, particularly Malaria, Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS” (ISFD, 2016).
- 2.
These are Mozambique (1994), Togo (1997), and Côte d’Ivoire (2001).
- 3.
The four new beneficiaries are Somalia, Niger, Comoros, and the minority Rohingya community in Myanmar (IsDB, 2015: 7).
- 4.
This is the equivalent of 4–14 percent share from the total international humanitarian aid.
- 5.
- 6.
In the OIC, the UAE and Qatar are scaling up their national programs with the Qatar Development Fund and the Ministry of International Cooperation and Development, respectively, just as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have done before them (Tok, 2015).
- 7.
This information is publicly available on the website (https://www.sfd.gov.sa).
References
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (Eds.). (2015). International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why States Act through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.
Al-Maznaee. (2014). OIC and UNHCR Commence Discussions in Geneva on Muslim Refugees. OIC Web Site.
Almezaini, K. S. (2011). The UAE and Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid, Identities and Interests. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
Bakhit, Atta Al-Mannan. (2008). The OIC Humanitarian Activities. Speech presented at OIC Inter-institutional Forum on the Occasion of the Celebration of the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Geneva.
Barakat, S., & Zyck, S. A. (2010). Gulf State Assistance to Conflict-Affected Environments. Research paper, Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalisation in the Gulf States. London: London School of Economics.
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 613–632.
Carroll, P., & Hynes, W. (2013). Engaging with Arab Aid Donors: The DAC Experience. IIIS Discussion Paper, 22 p.
Cavalli, G. (2009). The New Organization of the Islamic Conference Charter. Perspectives on Federalism, 1, Single Issue, 29–35.
Choudhury, M. A. (1998). Some Long-Term Goals for the Organization of Islamic Conference. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 36(2), 111–146.
COMCEC. (2015). Improving Basic Services Delivery for the Poor. Ankara: COMCEC Coordination Office.
Espinoza, R. A. (2013). The Macroeconomics of the Arab States of the Gulf. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fargues, P., & Venturini, A. (2015). Migration from North Africa and the Middle East: Skilled Migrants, Development and Globalisation. London: I.B. Tauris.
Harmer, A., & Cotterrell, L. (2005). Diversity in Donorship The Changing Landscape of Official Humanitarian Aid. Overseas Development Institute, no. 20, 46 p, https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/275.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2016.
Held, D., & McGrew, A. (Eds.). (2002). Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Hertog, S. (2010). Defying the Resource Curse: Explaining Successful State-Owned Enterprises in Rentier States. World Politics, 62(2), 261–301.
Hossain, I. (2012). The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC): Nature, Role, and the Issues. Journal of Third World Studies, 29(1), 287.
İhsanoğlu, E. (2010). The Islamic World in the New Century: The Organization of the Islamic Conference 1969–2009. London: Hurst.
IRIN. (2011, October 19). Arab and Muslim Aid and the West – ‘Two China Elephants’. IRIN. http://www.irinnews.org/analysis/2011/10/19. Accessed 25 Apr 2016.
Islamic Development Bank. (2015). 41 Years in the Service of Development. Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank.
Islamic Development Bank. (2016). Kuala Lumpur Office—Malaysia. Jeddah: IDB. http://www.IDB.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/IDBDevelopments/Internet/English/IDB/CM/About%20IDB/Organization/ROK.html
Islamic Solidarity Fund for Development. (2016). Fourth Annual Report. Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank.
Kamrava, M. (2012). Migrant Labor in the Persian Gulf. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kayaoglu, T. (2015). Organization of Islamic Cooperation: Politics, Problems and Potential. London: Routledge.
Kroessin, M. R. (2007). Worlds Apart? Muslim Donors and International Humanitarianism. Forced Migration Review, http://www.fmreview.org/FMRpdfs/FMR29/36.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2016.
Kuran, T. (2004). Islam and Mammon. The Economic Predicaments of Islamism. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Neumayer, E. (2003). The Determinants of Aid Allocation by Regional Multilateral Development Banks and United Nations Agencies. International Studies Quarterly, 47(1), 101–122.
Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. T. (2003). Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241–276.
OCHA. (2011). UN and Organization of Islamic Cooperation Strengthen Ties on Humanitarian Affairs. Available at: http://www.unocha.org/top-stories/all-stories/un-and-organization-islamic-cooperation-strengthen-ties-humanitarian-affairs. Accessed 17 Jan 2016.
OIC. (2005, December 7–8). Makkah Al-Mukarramah Declaration, 3rd Session of the Extraordinary Islamic Summit Conference, Makkah.
OIC. (2008, March 13–14). Charter of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, 11th Session of the Islamic Summit, Dakar, Senegal.
OIC. (2009, May 23–25). Resolution No. 1/36-ICHAD on the Humanitarian Affairs of the OIC, 36th Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers, Damascus, Arab Republic of Syria.
OIC. (2013a, December 9–11). Report of the Secretary General on OIC Humanitarian Activities, 40th Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers, Conakry, Republic of Guinea.
OIC. (2013b, December 9–11). Resolution No. 1/40-ICHAD on the Humanitarian Activities of the OIC, 40th Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers, Conakry, Republic of Guinea.
OIC. (2013c, December 9–11). Resolution No. 2/40-ICHAD on the Establishment of an OIC Humanitarian Emergency Response Fund, 40th Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers, Conakry, Republic of Guinea.
OIC. (2014, June 18–19). Resolution No. 1/41-ICHAD on the Humanitarian Activities of the OIC. Forty-First Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
OIC. (2015, May 27–28). Resolution No. 1/42-ICHAD on the Humanitarian Activities of the OIC. 42nd Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers, Kuwait, State of Kuwait.
Petersen, M. J. (2011). For Humanity or For the Umma? Ideologies of Aid in Four Transnational Muslim NGOs. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Reliefweb. (2005). Indonesia: Islamic States Raise $1.3 billion for Tsunami Reconstruction. https://reliefweb.int/report/indonesia/indonesia-islamic-states-raise-13-billion-tsunami-reconstruction. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
Reliefweb. (2015). Humanitarian Needs Overview – Sahel Region. https://reliefweb.int/report/mali/2015-humanitarian-needs-overview-sahel-region. Accessed 12 July 2018.
Sezgin, Z., & Dijkzeul, D. (2015). The New Humanitarians in International Practice: Emerging Actors and Contested Principles. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sharqieh, I. (2012). Can the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Resolve Conflicts? Peace and Conflict Studies, 9(2), 162–179.
Special Program for the Development of Africa. (2012). Progress Report. Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank.
Stuenkel, O. (2011). India’s and Brazil’s Foreign Aid and Their Roles in the Future Development Architecture (Presentation). http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/government-society/idd/research/aid-data/workshop-31-10-11/oliver-stuenkel.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2011.
Svoboda, E., Zyck, S. A., Osman, D., & Hashi, A. (2015). Islamic Humanitarianism? The Evolving Role of the Organization for Islamic Cooperation in Somalia and Beyond. Overseas Development Institute, www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications.../9457.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2016.
Tok, M. E. (2015, November). Gulf Donors and the 2030 Agenda: Towards a Khaleeji Mode of Development Cooperation. United Nations University. http://collections.unu.edu/view/UNU:3322. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
Villanger, E. (2007). Arab Foreign Aid: Disbursement Patterns, Aid Policies and Motives. Forum for Development Studies, 34(2), 223–256.
Woods, N. (2007). The Shifting Politics of Sovereign Aid. Global Economic Governance Working Paper 36. Oxford: Oxford University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tok, M.E., D’Alessandro, C. (2019). Global Governance and the Informal Nature of Islamic Development Assistance: The Peculiar Case of Gulf States. In: Pal, L.A., Tok, M.E. (eds) Global Governance and Muslim Organizations. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92561-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92561-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92560-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92561-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)