Preparing the Concept of Caveats for Empirical Research
The chapter completes the delimitation of the concept of caveats. Caveats are politically motivated, national conditions for the use of force in a coalition force, where military contingents are subordinated to a unified chain of command and relate to some common regulation of the use of force. Particular national conditions for the use of force can be either of a restrictive, or a permissive kind, and may be formally recognized as such, or be informal, undeclared, and even unadmitted by the force-contributing state, only to be observed in actual force-deviating behavior not related to lack of capacity or coordination. The empirical footprint of caveats are observable as national deviations from the coalition RoE in terms of when use of force is permitted and how; in national interference in the coalition’s chain of command on matters of task-assignment; and in national inflexibility in the extent to which coalition is delegated authority to make full use of the operational capacity of the contingent as to where, when, and how the national contingent may be deployed and used in theater of war.
KeywordsDefining properties of caveats Operational definitions of caveats Classifying caveats Restrictive caveats Permissive caveats National deviations from coalition RoE Bilateral force agreement
- Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.Google Scholar
- Anrig, C. F. (2015). The Belgian, Danish, Norwegian, and Dutch Experiences. In K. P. Mueller (Ed.), Precision and Purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
- Auerswald, D. P., & Saideman, S. M. (2014). NATO in Afghanistan: Fighting Together, Fighting Alone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bergen, P. L. (2011). The Longest War. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Bouchard, C. (2012). Lessons Learned from Operation Unified Protector—A Commander’s Perspective. Papers of the Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy, 27, 127–137.Google Scholar
- Brophy, J., & Fisera, M. (2010). National Caveats and Its Impact on the Army of the Czech Republic. http://user.unob.cz/fisera/files/clanky/National_Caveats_Short_Version_version_V_29JULY.pdf.
- Concise Oxford English Dictionary. (2006). Concise Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fermann, G., ed. (2013). Utenrikspolitikk og norsk krisehåndtering. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademika. https://www.cappelendamm.no/_utenrikspolitikk-og-norsk-kriseh%C3%A5ndtering-gunnar-fermann-9788202378691.
- Findlay, T. (2002). The Use of Force in UN Peace Operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Frost-Nielsen, P. M. (2016). Betingede forpliktelser. Nasjonale reservasjoner i militære koalisjonsoperasjoner. Ph.D. Dissertation in Political Science, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim.Google Scholar
- Høiback, H. (2009). The Noble Art of Constructive Ambiguity. Oslo Files on Defence and Security, 3, 19–39.Google Scholar
- Husby, G. (2015). Fra hull i luften, til hull i Gaddafis bunker. Bruk av politiske reservasjoner på norsk militærmakt i flernasjonale koalisjonsoperasjoner. En komparativ studie av F-16 bidragene i Kosovo, Afghanistan og Libya. Master Thesis in Political Science, Department of Sociology and Political Science. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim.Google Scholar
- Kay, S. (2013). No More Free-Riding: The Political Economy of Military Power and the Transatlantic Relationship. In J. H. Matlary & Magnus Petersson (Eds.), NATO’s European Allies—Military Capability and Political Will (pp. 97–120). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Trønnes, O. (2012) Mapping and Explaining Norwegian Caveats in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2008. Master thesis in Political Science, Trondheim, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).Google Scholar
- Van der Meulen, J., & Kawano, H. (2008). Accidental Neighbours: Japanese and Dutch Troops in Iraq. In J. Soeters & P. Manigart (Eds.), Military Cooperation in Multinational Peace Operations: Managing Cultural Diversity and Crisis Response (pp. 166–179). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar