Advertisement

Whom to Call? In Search of a European Policy on Russia and China

  • Robin AllersEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter assesses Europe’s response to a resurgent Russia and a rising China. To what extent do Europeans see these powers as security challenges of the same order and how do they seek to confront them? Geography makes the impact of Sino-Russian relations different on the European flank of the Eurasian continent than on the Asia-Pacific flank. No European country has to worry about the geographic proximity of both China and Russia the same way as Japan does. Nonetheless, in an international system increasingly shaped by great power rivalry, the Europe-China-Russia triangle has become critically important. NATO has responded to Russia’s aggressive behavior by reinforcing its Eastern European members, but for Washington it is China’s rise that represents the greater challenge to its global interests. This divergence of view presents Europe and the transatlantic relationship with a number of challenges.

Keywords

European Union EU NATO Germany China Russia Transatlantic relations Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) Multilateralism International order Ukraine Sanctions 

References

  1. Alderman, Liz, and David Barboza. 2011. Europe Tries to Lure Chinese Cash to Back Rescue of Euro. New York Times, October 28. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/29/world/asia/europe-seeks-chinese-investment-in-euro-rescue.html?pagewanted=all.
  2. Allen, Mike. 2009. America’s First Pacific President. Politico, November 13. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29511.html.
  3. Allers, Robin. 2017. Modern Deterrence? NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence on the Eastern Flank. In NATO and Collective Defence in the 21st Century, ed. Karsten Friis. Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Augstein, Franziska. 2015. How Angela Merkel Became Europe’s Undisputed Leader. The Guardian, February 15. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/15/angela-merkel-germany-ukraine-putin-obama.
  5. Ayres, Alyssa. 2017. Tillerson on India: Partners in a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”. Council on Foreign Relations, October 18. https://www.cfr.org/blog/tillerson-india-partners-free-and-open-indo-pacific.
  6. Barnes, Julian. 2017. If North Korea Attacks Guam, U.S. Holds Open Option for NATO Mutual Defense. Wall Street Journal, September 22. https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-north-korea-attacks-guam-u-s-may-push-for-nato-mutual-defense-1506093433.
  7. BBC. 2005. Putin Deplores Collapse of USSR. BBC News, April 25. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4480745.stm.
  8. Beckley, Michael. 2017. Balancing China: How the United States and its Partners Can Check Chinese Naval Expansion. War on the Rocks, University of Texas, November 15. https://warontherocks.com/2017/11/balancing-china-united-states-partners-can-check-chinese-naval-expansion/.
  9. Bew, John. 2015. The Syrian War and the Return of Great Power Politics. New Statesman, December 15. https://www.newstatesman.com/world/middle-east/2015/12/syrian-war-and-return-great-power-politics.
  10. Bond, Ian. 2017. European Policy in Asia: Getting Past Mercatorism and Mercantilism. Centre for European Reform Insight, September 7, available at http://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_IB_7.9.17.pdf.
  11. Borchert, Thomas. 2017. Russisch-chinesische Provokation im Baltikum. Frankfurter Rundschau, July 26. http://www.fr.de/politik/militaermanoever-russisch-chinesische-provokation-im-baltikum-a-1320086.
  12. Brunnstrom, David. 2009. EU Says It Has Solved the Kissinger Question. Reuters, November 20. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-president-kissinger/eu-says-it-has-solved-the-kissinger-question-idUSTRE5AJ00B20091120. Accessed 22 Oct 2017.
  13. Burns, Nicholas R., et al. 2012. Anchoring the Alliance. Atlantic Council, May, Washington, DC. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/files/publication_pdfs/403/051412_ACUS_Burns_AnchoringAlliance.pdf.
  14. Butler, Nick. 2017. Nord Stream 2. A Test of German Power. Financial Times, July 3. https://www.ft.com/content/4875c9ff-0868-3798-8f66-4efa667eb5ba.
  15. Casarini, Nicola. 2017. A New Era for EU–China Relations? How They Are Forging Ahead Without the United States. Foreign Affairs, June 6. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2017-06-06/new-era-eu-china-relations.
  16. Champion, Marc, Peter Martin, and Brian Parkin. 2017. China, Germany Step up as U.S. Retires From World Leadership, Bloomberg, July 4. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-03/as-u-s-retires-from-world-leadership-china-and-germany-step-up.
  17. Clinton, Hillary. 2011. America’s Pacific Century. Foreign Policy, November. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century?page=full.
  18. Directorate General for International Relations and Strategy. 2016. France and Security in the Asia-Pacific. http://www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/475376/7615622/file/201606-PlaquetteAsiePacifiqueEN.comp.pdf.
  19. Dunai, Marton. 2017. Hungary Tests EU Nerves Frayed by Russia as Putin Visits Budapest. Reuters, February 1. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-hungary/hungary-tests-eu-nerves-frayed-by-russia-as-putin-visits-budapest-idUSKBN15G4XW.
  20. EEAS. 2015. European External Action Service’s Timeline, updated 5 February, available at https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/15872/EU-China%20relations%20Timeline.
  21. EEAS. 2018. European External Action Service, Factsheet, Permanent Structured Cooperation, March 5. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eu_factsheet_pesco_permanent_structured_cooperation_en_0.pdf.
  22. EuroNews. 2007. Kissinger Speaks on Iran, European–Russian Relations and EU’s Political Future. March 31, available at http://www.euronews.com/2007/03/31/kissinger-speaks-on-iran-european-russian-relations-and-eu-s-political-future.
  23. European Council. 2017. “United We Stand, Divided We Fall”, Letter by President Donald Tusk to the 27 EU Heads of State or Government on the Future of the EU Before the Malta Summit, Brussels, January 31, available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/01/31/tusk-letter-future-europe/pdf.
  24. European Union. 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World, European Security Strategy, Brussels, December 12, available at https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/european-security-strategy-secure-europe-better-world.
  25. European Union. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, European Union, June. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.
  26. Fardella, Enrico, Christian F. Ostermann, and Charles Kraus (eds.). 2015. Sino-European Relations During the Cold War and the Rise of a Multipolar World. A Critical Oral History. Washington, DC: Wilson Center. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Sino_European_Relations_during_Cold_War_Rise_of_Multipolar_World_%282015%29.pdf.
  27. Fidler. 2017. China’s Xi Jinping Speech Seen as Move to Fill Global Leadership Role. Wall Street Journal, January 17. https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-xi-jinping-speech-seen-as-move-to-fill-global-leadership-role-1484660546.
  28. Fink, Carole, and Bernd Schaefer. 2009. Ostpolitik, 1969–1974: European and Global Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fischer, Sabine. 2015. European Union Sanctions Against Russia. Objectives, Impact and Next Steps. SWP Comments, March, https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2015C17_fhs.pdf.
  30. Frears, Thomas, Lukasz Kulesa, and Denitsa Raynova. 2016. Managing Hazardous Incidents in the Euro-Atlantic Area: A New Plan of Action, European Leadership Network, Policy, Policy Brief, November 2. https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/russia-west-incidents-on-the-rise/?mc_cid=fc44423228&mc_eid=b166b184b6.
  31. Gabuev, Alexander. 2016. Friends with Benefits? Russian–Chinese Relations After the Ukraine Crisis. Carnegie Moscow Center, June 29, http://carnegie.ru/2016/06/29/friends-with-benefits-russian-chinese-relations-after-ukraine-crisis-pub-63953.
  32. German Federal Government. 2016. The White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr, Berlin, available at https://www.bundeswehr.de/resource/resource/.
  33. German Ministry of Defence. 2017. China vertraut deutscher Diplomatie im Nord-Korea Konflikt. BMVG.de, October 4. https://www.bmvg.de/de/aktuelles/china-vertraut-deutscher-diplomatie-im-nordkorea-konflikt-18584.
  34. Godement, Francois. 2016. China and Brexit: What’s in It for Us? European Council on Foreign Relations Special Issue, September. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/CA_MES_2016.pdf.
  35. Godement, Francois, and Abigael Vasselier. 2017. China at the Gates: A New Power Audit of EU–China Relations. European Council on Foreign Relations, December 1. http://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/china_eu_power_audit7242.
  36. Godement, Francois, et al. 2011. The Scramble for Europe. European Council on Foreign Relations, July. http://www.ecfr.eu/content/entry/chinas_scramble_for_europe.
  37. Group of German Experts. 2017. In Spite of It All, America. New York Times, October 11. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/11/world/europe/germany-united-states-trump-manifesto.html.
  38. Gutschker, Thomas. 2017. « Merkel: Deutschland kann im Nordkorea-Konflikt vermitteln » , Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, September 10. http://m.faz.net/aktuell/politik/kanzlerin-im-f-a-s-gespraech-merkel-deutschland-kann-im-nordkorea-konflikt-vermitteln-15191111.amp.html.
  39. Haas, Benjamin. 2017. Steve Bannon Compares China to 1930s Germany and Says US Must Confront Beijing. Guardian, September 11. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/sep/11/steve-bannon-compares-china-to-1930s-germany-and-says-us-must-confront-beijing.
  40. Hadar, Leon. 2017. The Limits of Trump’s Transactional Foreign Policy. The National Interest, January 2. http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-limits-trumps-transactional-foreign-policy-18898.
  41. Harding, Robin. 2016. Japan Fears Brexit Blow to EU Arms Embargo on China. Financial Times, July 4. https://www.ft.com/content/219af680-41c6-11e6-b22f-79eb4891c97d.
  42. Heilmann, Sebastian, und Eberhard Sandschneider. 2015. „Das ist eine Bombe“. Scheitert China?, im Gespräch, Internationale Politik, July 1. https://zeitschrift-ip.dgap.org/de/ip-die-zeitschrift/ip-laenderportraet/ip-laenderportraet-archiv/laenderportraet-china-2-2015/das-ist.
  43. Higgins, Andrew. 2017. China and Russia Hold First Joint Naval Drill in the Baltic Sea. New York Times, July 25. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/25/world/europe/china-russia-baltic-navy-exercises.html.
  44. Horowitz, Jason, and Liz Alderman. 2017. Chastised by E.U., a Resentful Greece Embraces China’s Cash and Interests. New York Times, August 26. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/26/world/europe/greece-china-piraeus-alexis-tsipras.html.
  45. Institute for Security and Development Policy. 2016. Sino-Nordic Relations: Opportunities and the Way Ahead, Stockholm. http://isdp.eu/content/uploads/2016/11/2016-Sino-Nordic-Relations-Opportunities-and-the-Way-Ahead.pdf.
  46. Kagan, Robert. 2003. Of Paradise and Power. America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  47. Kettle, Martin. 2017. We are Obsessed with Brexit and Trump: We Should Be Thinking About China. The Guardian, October 20. https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/20/trump-xi-world-leader-chinese-communist-party-congress-speech.
  48. Kirchner, Emil J., Thomas Christiansen, and Han Dorussen (eds.). 2016. Security Relations Between China and the European Union: From Convergence to Cooperation? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kissinger, Henry A. 1973. Address Given by Henry A. Kissinger, New York, April 23. https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2002/9/30/dec472e3-9dff-4c06-ad8d-d3fab7e13f9f/publishable_en.pdf.
  50. Kudnani, Hans, and Jonas Parello-Plessner. 2012. China and Germany: Why the Emerging Special Relationship Matters for Europe. ECFR Policy Brief, European Council on Foreign Relations, May, London. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/173460/ECFR55_CHINA_GERMANY_BRIEF_AW.pdf.
  51. Lai Suetyi. 2017. Understanding Europe’s Interest in China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Carnegie, May 10. http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/05/10/understanding-europe-s-interest-in-china-s-belt-and-road-initiative-pub-69920.
  52. Legvold, Robert. 2017. U.S.–Russian Relations in the Trump Era, ISSF POLICY Series, America and the World—2017 and Beyond. The International Security ‘Studies Forum, September 6. https://issforum.org/roundtables/policy/1-5ax-russia.
  53. Lieberthal, Kenneth. 2011. The American Pivot to Asia. Foreign Policy, December 21. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/12/21/the_american_pivot_to_asia.
  54. Liebich, Andrew. 2016. Ressentiment: Understanding Russia’s Attitude to the EU. Graduate Institute Geneva, April 6. http://graduateinstitute.ch/home/relations-publiques/news-at-the-institute/news-archives.html/_/news/corporate/2016/ressentiment-understanding-russi.
  55. Mann, James. 2017. The Adults in the Room. New York Review of Books, October 26. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/10/26/trump-adult-supervision/.
  56. Masala, Carlo, et al. 2015. Maritime Sicherheit im Indischen Ozean. Mehr deutsches Engagement im Ozean des 21. Jahrhunderts. KAS Analysen und Argumente, Juni, http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_41590-544-1-30.pdf?150904102712.
  57. Mazarr, Michael, and Hal Brands. 2017. Navigating Great Power Rivalry in the 21st Century. War on the Rocks, April 5. https://warontherocks.com/2017/04/navigating-great-power-rivalry-in-the-21st-century/.
  58. McMaster, H.R., and Gary D. Cohn. 2017. America First Doesn’t Mean America Alone. Wall Street Journal, May 30. https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-first-doesnt-mean-america-alone-1496187426.
  59. Ministère des Armeés. 2013. Livre Blanc sur la Defense. Paris, available at https://www.defense.gouv.fr/.
  60. Mogherini, Federica. 2016. Foreword. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, European Union, June. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.
  61. Mohan, Garima. 2017. Engaging with the Indian Ocean. Opportunities and Challenges for Germany. GPPI, November 2017. http://www.gppi.net/fileadmin/user_upload/media/pub/2017/Mohan_2017_Engaging_with_the_Indian_Ocean.pdf.
  62. Moravcsik, Andrew. 2017. Europe is Still a Superpower. Foreign Policy, April 13. http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/13/europe-is-still-a-superpower/.
  63. Norwegian Intelligence Service. 2017. Annual Report Focus 2017, available at https://forsvaret.no/en/ForsvaretDocuments/Fokus2017_2002_ENGELSK_v2.pdf.
  64. Orbie, Jan. 2006. Civilian Power Europe. Review of the Original and Current Debates. Cooperation and Conflict 41 (1): 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parameswaran, Prashanth. 2017. Trump’s Indo-Pacific Strategy Challenge. The Diplomat, October 27. https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/trumps-indo-pacific-strategy-challenge/.
  66. Parly, Florence. 2017. « La France veut conserver une autonomie stratégique ». Le Monde, October 13. http://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2017/10/13/florence-parly-la-france-veut-conserver-une-autonomie-strategique_5200442_3210.html#GA5jDR0stlA5t0Tb.99.
  67. Pillai, Chad. 2014. The Return of Great Power Politics—Re-Examining the Nixon-Doctrine. War on the Rocks, March 27, University of Texas, https://warontherocks.com/2014/03/the-return-of-great-power-politics-re-examining-the-nixon-doctrine/.
  68. Rachman, Gideon. 2009. Kissinger Never Wanted to Dial Europe. Financial Times, July 22. https://www.ft.com/content/c4c1e0cd-f34a-3b49-985f-e708b247eb55.
  69. Rachman, Gideon. 2017a. Brexit Reinforces Britain’s Imperial Amnesia. Financial Times, March 27. https://www.ft.com/content/e3e32b38-0fc8-11e7-a88c-50ba212dce4d.
  70. Rachman, Gideon. 2017b. Angela Merkel’s Blunder, Donald Trump and the End of the West. Financial Times, May 29. https://www.ft.com/content/dc911cb8-4449-11e7-8519-9f94ee97d996.
  71. Reuters. 2017b. « After Summits with Trump, Merkel Says Europe Must Take Fate into Own Hands » . May 28. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-politics-merkel/after-summits-with-trump-merkel-says-europe-must-take-fate-into-own-hands-idUSKBN18O0JK.
  72. Rovner, Joshua, et al. 2017. Policy Roundtable 1-9 on U.S.–China Relations and the Trump Administration. ISSF, May 13. https://issforum.org/roundtables/policy/1-9-us-china.
  73. Rudd, Kevin. 2012. Speech at the 48th Munich Security Conference. http://www.securityconference.de/Kevin-Rudd.837+M544261a91d7.0.html.
  74. Sanders, Lewis. 2017. NATO Chief Predicts Increased Dialogue with Russia in 2018. Deutsche Welle, December 29. http://www.dw.com/en/nato-chief-predicts-increased-dialogue-with-russia-in-2018/a-41966005.
  75. Sevastopulo, Demetri. 2017. Trump Gives Glimpse of ‘Indo-Pacific’ Strategy to Counter China. Financial Times, November 13. https://www.ft.com/content/e6d17fd6-c623-11e7-a1d2-6786f39ef675.
  76. Shalal, Andrea. 2017. Germany Big Target of Cyber Espionage and Attacks: Government Report. Reuters, July 4. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-espionage/germany-big-target-of-cyber-espionage-and-attacks-government-report-idUSKBN19P0UC.
  77. Shalal, Andrea, and Andreas Rinke. 2017. Germany Tries to Defuse N. Korea Tensions, Praises China. Reuters, August 16. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-germany/germany-tries-to-defuse-n-korea-tensions-praises-china-idUSKCN1AW1GM.
  78. Stanzel, Angela. 2016. A German View of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. European Council on Foreign Relations, April 21. http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_a_german_view_of_the_aiib_7275.
  79. Sverdrup Thygeson, Bjørnar, Wrenn Yennie Lindgren, and Marc Lanteigne (eds.). 2018. China and Nordic Diplomacy. Routledge Focus.Google Scholar
  80. The Economist. 2017a. Xi Jinping has More Clout than Donald Trump. The World Should Be Wary. October 14. https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21730144-do-not-expect-mr-xi-change-china-or-world-better-xi-jinping-has-more-clout.
  81. The Economist. 2017b. Counsel of Warriors: Donald Trump’s Generals Cannot Control Him. November 9. https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21731112-americas-president-loves-men-uniform-and-they-often-give-him-sound-advice-it-mr.
  82. The Economist. 2017c. Germany is Not the New Leader of the Free World. The Economist, July 8. https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21724832-angela-merkel-may-sound-tough-donald-trump-her-country-still-depends-america-germany.
  83. The White House. 2012. Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament. November 17. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament.
  84. Tocci, Nathalie. 2019. Who Do I Call If I Want to Call the US? Politico, March 14. https://www.politico.eu/article/who-do-i-call-if-i-want-to-call-the-us/.
  85. Tudda, Chris. 2012. A Cold War Turning Point: Nixon and China, 1969–1972. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Tunsjø, Øystein. 2013. Europe’s Favourable Isolation. Survival, 55/5.Google Scholar
  87. Valášek, Tomáš. 2017. China and Central Europe: Don’t Believe the Hype. Carnegie Europe, November 28. http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/74844.
  88. Vasagar, Jeevan. 2016. Britain Revives Military Engagement East of Suez. Financial Times, December 23. https://www.ft.com/content/3477fe5a-c809-11e6-8f29-9445cac8966f.
  89. Wagner, Rene, and Michael Nienaber. 2017 China Steams Past U.S., France to be Germany’s Biggest Trading Partner. Reuters, February 24. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-economy-trade/china-steams-past-u-s-france-to-be-germanys-biggest-trading-partner-idUSKBN1622SO.
  90. Whitman, Richard G. 2004. NATO, the EU and ESDP: An Emerging Division of Labour? Contemporary Security Policy 25 (3): 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilhelmsen, Julie, and Jakub Godzimierski. 2017. Spiral of Distrust. In NATO and Collective Defence in the 21st Century, ed. Karsten Friis. Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Winand, Pascaline. 2010. Kissinger’s Year of Europe and the Europeans. In We Are on the Right Path. Willy Brandt and European Unification, ed. Andreas Wilkens. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Defence StudiesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations