Advertisement

Surveying Older Adults’ Perceptions and Aspirations

  • Belinda YuenEmail author
  • Chathura Withanage
  • Parvathi Nair
Chapter
  • 349 Downloads

Abstract

This Chapter presents a personal interview survey. The key instrument is a questionnaire that seeks to find out older adults’ (aged 55 and older) experiences and perceptions about growing older in Singapore, their housing and neighbourhood spaces. It explores issues relating to housing satisfaction and mobility aspiration, self-reported housing modification and housing needs, frequency of outdoor activities and satisfaction with neighbourhood public spaces as well as desired facilities and service clusters.

Keywords

Public spacesPublic Space satisfactionSatisfaction surveySurvey questionnaireQuestionnaire perceptionsPerception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the many people who have helped us with the survey presented in this chapter: Mayor Dr. Teo Ho Pin, Northwest Community Development Council (CDC), for facilitating access to various community and grassroots seniors events and activities; Member of Parliament (MP) Dr. Amy Khor, Senior Minister of State in the Ministries of Health and of Manpower, for facilitating access to seniors groups in Hong Kah North constituency; MP Desmond Lee, Minister of State for National Development, for facilitating access to seniors community clubs in Jurong Spring constituency; MP Sam Tan, Minister of State, Prime Minister’s Office and Ministry of Culture for facilitating access to the Radin Mas Active Ageing Council and seniors community groups in Radin Mas constituency; MP Dr. Lily Neo, Tanjong Pagar GRC, for facilitating access to Senior Activity Centres in the Kreta Ayer/Chinatown area; Mrs. Yu-Foo Yee Shoon for introducing us to Active Contributive Engaged Seniors (ACE Seniors); Siti Habibah Siraj, Director, Malay Heritage Foundation for connecting us to the elderly Malay community; Prabha Seth and Thomson Community Centre Indian Activity Executive Committee for helping us to connect with their local Indian community and administering the Survey in Tamil, where needed; South-east Community Development Council, Community Outreach Programme for the Elderly (COPE), various Voluntary Welfare Organisations (VWOs) who work with seniors to reach the older population within the Southeast Community Development Council; Eurasian Association for assisting us to connect with the Eurasian older community; Staff of Sunlove Senior Activity Centres, NTUC SilverAce Senior Activity Centres, Tung Ling Community Services, Goodlife! Family Services, Kreta Ayer/Chinatown Senior Activity Centres, Presbyterian Community Services Sarah Seniors Activity Centre, Radin Mas Active Ageing Council, Active Contributive Engaged Seniors (ACE Seniors), Jia Ying Community Services Society, Jalan Kukoh Senior Activity Centre, Jamiyah Ar-Rabitah Mosque, Joo Seng Neighbour Ring Community Services, Telok Blangah Seniors Activity Centre, Thye Hua Kuan Moral Charity Senior Activity Centres for granting us access to conduct the survey; constituency directors and staff of the various constituencies and community centres for facilitating access to the seniors communities in their constituencies/centres; the many individuals who facilitated access to private housing estates, country/community clubs, elderly interests, qigong, wellness, theatre and cultural groups; our colleagues, Debbie Loo, Laura Jasmine, our student interviewers, seniors interviewers from ACE Seniors Club and other adult interviewers for helping us conduct such an extensive number of interviews; Dinusha Senanayake for data compilation and digitising the completed questionnaires; Cheong Sue Wei, student intern Lim Aunn Ning and other part-time helpers for data entry and verification; Cheong Sue Wei and Emily Soh Yongxu for their inputs to the writing of the “Summary of Key Findings”; all residents who participated in our interview and generously shared with us their responses and experiences of their ageing, homes and neighbourhoods.

References

  1. Andres, L. (2012). Designing and doing survey research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N. M., & Silverstein, M. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of theories of ageing. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, J., Czaja, R. F., & Blair, E. A. (2014). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Buckingham, A., & Saunders, P. (2004). The survey methods workbook: From design to analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. (2013). American time use survey summary, bureau of labor statistics 2013. http://www.bls.gov/tus/. Accessed September 29, 2015.
  6. Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. De Vaus, D. (2014). Surveys in social research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Statistics, Singapore (2012). 2012 population trends. Singapore: Department of Statistics. http://costofhealthyliving.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/population2012.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2017.
  10. Department of Statistics, Singapore. (2016). Population trends 2016. Singapore: Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Furstenberg, A. L. (2002). Trajectories of aging: Imagined pathways in later life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 55, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Help the Aged. (2006). Older people. Decent Homes and Fuel Poverty, London: Help the aged.Google Scholar
  14. Housing and Development Board. (2014). Sample household survey 2013. Singapore: Housing and Development Board.Google Scholar
  15. Kong, L. (2007). Singapore hawker centres: People, places, food. Singapore: National Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  16. Lai, A. E. (2010). The Kopitiam in Singapore: An evolving story about migration and diversity. Asia Research Institute Working Paper Series No. 132. Singapore: Asia Research Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Lascu, D., Manrai, L. A., & Manrai, A. K. (1996). Value differences between Polish and Romanian consumers: A caution against using a regiocentric marketing orientation in East Europe. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 8, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levy, B. R. (2003). Mind matters: Cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5–55.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (1995). 1995 National survey of senior citizens. Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports. https://www.msf.gov.sg/publications/Documents/Materials_SC_NationalSurvey1995.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2017.
  21. Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports, Singapore. (1999). 1999 Survey of transitions in health, wealth and welfare of elderly Singaporeans. Singapore: Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports, Singapore (2008). 2008 Survey on the learning needs of seniors in Singapore. Singapore: Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports. https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/dam/moh_web/Publications/Reports/2008/MCYS%20Survey%20on%20the%20Learning%20Needs%20of%20Seniors%20in%20Singapore.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2017.
  23. Ministry of Health, Singapore. (2016). I feel young in my Singapore! Action plan for successful ageing. Singapore: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  24. Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. (2016). Survey methods in social investigation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. National Heritage Board. (2013). Void decks, community heritage series III. Singapore: National Heritage Board.Google Scholar
  26. Pew Research Centre. (2009). Growing old in America: Expectations vs. reality. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Sarkisian, C. A., Prohaska, T. R., Wong, M. D., Hirsch, S., & Mangione, C. M. (2005). The relationship between expectations for aging and physical activity among older adults. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 911–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singapore Sports Council. (2011). National sports participation survey 2011, final report. Singapore: Singapore Sports Council.Google Scholar
  31. Sneed, J. R., & Whitbourne, S. K. (2005). Models of the aging self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yuen, B., & Soh, E. Y. S. (2017). Housing for older people in Singapore: An annotated bibliography. Springer Briefs in Ageing. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Belinda Yuen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chathura Withanage
    • 1
  • Parvathi Nair
    • 1
  1. 1.Singapore University of Technology and DesignSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations