Skip to main content

Steps Toward a More Inclusive Mathematics Pedagogy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2299 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

This chapter is based on an action research project with the mathematics teaching staff of a school that serves special needs students from grades 2 to 12. Now in its fifth year, and with the aim of refining practices to ensure that all students have the opportunity to learn, the collaboration has adopted the analogy that “learning to teach differently is like learning another language.” This framing has highlighted the complexities, difficulties, and strategies associated with shifting from highly familiar standardized, teacher-centered classroom practices to more authentic emphases that are consonant with reform efforts. In this chapter, we report on the power of this frame to effect transformations in teachers’ beliefs and actions, while also highlighting how easily one’s “native language” can seep into, undermine, and obscure efforts at transformation. By way of initial example, through action research, strategies have been implemented to ensure teachers are constantly aware of multiple learner interpretations, yet there is a persistent recurrence in classrooms of questions of the form “Can anyone tell me…?” We argue that such questions may be indicative of a mode of directive teaching that is aimed at a “representative learner,” in contrast to a mode of responsive teaching that is attentive to the sense(s) that each learner might actually be making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have deliberately omitted the detail of the topic and problem here and in the subsequent teacher questions, for reasons that we explain in the next paragraph.

  2. 2.

    We follow a convention in the cognitive science literature in the use of small caps (small caps) to signify metaphors.

  3. 3.

    Proponents of “lesson study” (e.g., Cerbin 2011; Lewis et al. 2009) have alighted on a similar insight about the granularity of focus for meaningful impact, but whereas the focus of lesson study (at least in its original form) is the iterative refinement of specific lesson content, in ours the focus is on examining the structures of teaching.

  4. 4.

    BEDMAS (Brackets, Exponents, Division & Multiplication, Addition & Subtraction) is one of many acronyms used to help learners remember the order of operations for basic arithmetic and algebraic manipulations.

References

  • Cerbin, W. (2011). Lesson study: Using classroom inquiry to improve teaching and learning in higher education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Renert, M. (2014). The math teachers know: Profound understanding of emergent mathematics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2015). Engaging minds: Cultures of education and practices of teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1990). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9102-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shem-Tov, N. (2011). Improvisational teaching as mode of knowing. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 45(3), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 3, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davis, B., Towers, J., Karpe, R., Drefs, M., Chapman, O., Friesen, S. (2018). Steps Toward a More Inclusive Mathematics Pedagogy. In: Kajander, A., Holm, J., Chernoff, E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Secondary School Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92389-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92390-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics