Advertisement

Integrated Systems for Removal of BPA from Wastewater

  • Magdalena ZIELIŃSKAEmail author
  • Irena WOJNOWSKA-BARYŁA
  • Agnieszka CYDZIK-KWIATKOWSKA
Chapter
  • 304 Downloads

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in the combined methods of BPA removal from wastewater that involve mostly the integration of chemical and biological approaches, in which the conventional biological treatment is supported by Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) such as photocatalysis, ozone oxidation, Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation, and wet air oxidation (WAO). These chemical treatments, used to break down BPA to molecules suitable for biotreatment, have been developed mostly to improve the recycling and re-use of wasted sludge. The pre-treatment enhances the hydrolysis of sludge, which reduces the stabilization time and increases the degree of degradation during biological treatment. Wasted sludge pre-treatments rupture suspended solids (microbial cells), liberate the nutrients, partially solubilize the suspended solids, increase the soluble chemical oxygen demand and decrease sludge viscosity. In addition, the utilization of membranes for polishing biological secondary effluent and for supporting AOPs has been reported. These integrated methods have been applied to increase the biodegradability, improve the quality and detoxify the effluent streams. They are considered advantageous for water reuse that requires high efficiency of pollutant removal. This chapter aims at providing a review on the integration of different treatment approaches which have been described as favorable for the acquisition of high-quality effluent.

Keywords

Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) Soluble Chemical Oxygen Demand photo-Fenton Oxidation Sludge Conventional Biological Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ba S, Jones JP, Cabana H (2014) Hybrid bioreactor (HBR) of hollow fiber microfilter membrane and cross-linked laccase aggregates eliminate aromatic pharmaceuticals in wastewaters. J Hazard Mater 280:662–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baroutian S, Gapes DJ, Sarmah AK et al (2016) Formation and degradation of valuable intermediate products during wet oxidation of municipal sludge. Bioresour Technol 205:280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belgiorno V, Rizzo L, Fatta D et al (2007) Review on endocrine disrupting-emerging compounds in urban wastewater: occurrence and removal by photocatalysis and ultrasonic irradiation for wastewater reuse. Desalination 215:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertanza G, Pedrazzani R, Dal Grande M et al (2011) Effect of biological and chemical oxidation on the removal of estrogenic compounds (NP and BPA) from wastewater: An integrated assessment procedure. Water Res 45:2473–2484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterfield M, Christensen PA, Curtis TP et al (1997) Water disinfection using an immobilized titanium dioxide film in a photochemical reactor with electric field enhancement. Water Res 31:675–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen GC, Shan XQ, Wang YS et al (2009) Adsorption of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol by multi-walled carbon nanotubes as affected by Cu(II). Water Res 43:2409–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiang K, Lim TM, Tsen L et al (2004) Photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of bisphenol A by TiO2 and platinized TiO2. Appl Catal A 261:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chin SS, Lim TM, Chiang K et al (2007) Factors affecting the performance of a low-pressure submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor. Chem Eng J 130:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman HM, Chiang K, Amal R (2005) Effects of Ag and Pt on photocatalytic degradation of endocrine disrupting chemicals in water. Chem Eng J 113:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Escalona I, Fortuny A, Stüber F et al (2014) Fenton coupled with nanofiltration for elimination of bisphenol A. Desalination 345:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu J, Ji M, Wang Z et al (2006) A new submerged membrane photocatalysis reactor (SMPR) for fulvic acid removal using a nano-structured photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 131:238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gassara F, Brar SK, Verma M et al (2013) Bisphenol A degradation in water by ligninolytic enzymes. Chemosphere 92:1356–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Genc N, Yonsel S, Dagas L et al (2002) Wet oxidation: a pre-treatment procedure for sludge. Waste Manag 22:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Göbel A, McArdell CS, Joss A et al (2007) Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies. Sci Total Environ 372:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heo J, Flora JRV, Her N et al (2012) Removal of bisphenol A and 17b-estradiol in single walled carbon nanotubes–ultrafiltration (SWNTs–UF) membrane systems. Sep Purif Technol 90:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hommes G, Gasser CA, Howald CBC et al (2012) Production of a robust nanobiocatalyst for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 115:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ispas CR, Ravalli MT, Steere A et al (2010) Multifunctional biomagnetic capsules for easy removal of phenol and bisphenol A. Water Res 44:1961–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaneco S, Rahmana MA, Suzuki T et al (2004) Optimization of solar photocatalytic degradation conditions of bisphenol A in water using titanium dioxide. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem 163:419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim JH, Kim S, Lee CH et al (2008a) A novel nanofiltration hybrid system to control organic micro-pollutants: application of dual functional adsorbent/catalyst. Desalination 231:276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim JH, Park PK, Lee CH et al (2008b) A novel hybrid system for the removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals: nanofiltration and homogeneous catalytic oxidation. J Membr Sci 312:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostarelos K (2008) The long and short of carbon nanotube toxicity. Nat Biotechnol 26:774–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R et al (2006) A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee SA, Choo KH, Lee CH et al (2001) Use of ultrafiltration membranes for the separation of TiO2 photocatalysts in drinking water treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:1712–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee JW, Cha HY, Park KY et al (2005) Operational strategies for an activated sludge process in conjunction with ozone oxidation for zero excess sludge production during winter season. Water Res 39:1199–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee J, Lee BC, Ra JS et al (2008) Comparison of the removal efficiency of endocrine disrupting compounds in pilot scale sewage treatment processes. Chemosphere 71:1582–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li XZ, Liu H, Cheng LF et al (2003) Photocatalytic oxidation using a new catalyst—TiO2 microsphere—for water and wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 37:3989–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liang L, Zhang J, Feng P et al (2015) Occurrence of bisphenol A in surface and drinking waters and its physicochemical removal technologies. Front Environ Sci Eng 9:16–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin K, Liu W, Gan J (2009) Oxidative removal of bisphenol A by manganese dioxide: efficacy, products, and pathways. Environ Sci Technol 43:3860–3864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y (2003) Chemically reduced excess sludge production in the activated sludge process. Chemosphere 50:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mauter MS, Elimelech M (2008) Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 42:5843–5859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohapatra DP, Brar SK, Tyagi RD et al (2010) Degradation of endocrine disrupting bisphenol A during pre-treatment and biotransformation of wastewater sludge. Chem Eng J 163:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohapatra DP, Brar SK, Tyagi RD et al (2011a) Parameter optimization of ferro-sonication pre-treatment process for degradation of bisphenol A and biodegradation from wastewater sludge using response surface model. J Hazard Mater 189:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohapatra DP, Brar SK, Tyagi RD et al (2011b) Concomitant degradation of bisphenol A during ultrasonication and Fenton oxidation and production of biofertilizer from wastewater sludge. Ultrason Sonochem 18:1018–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Molinari R, Borgese M, Drioli E et al (2002) Hybrid processes coupling photocatalysis and membranes for degradation of organic pollutants in water. Catal Today 75:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakada N, Shinohara H, Murata A et al (2007) Removal of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) during sand filtration and ozonation at a municipal sewage treatment plant. Water Res 41:4373–4382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oleszczuk P, Pan B, Xing BS (2009) Adsorption and desorption of oxytetracycline and carbamazepine by multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 43:9167–9173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pan B, Xing BS (2008) Adsorption mechanisms of organic chemicals on carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 42:9005–9013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pan B, Lin DH, Mashayekhi H et al (2008a) Adsorption and hysteresis of bisphenol A and 17a-ethinyl estradiol on carbon nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 42:5480–5485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan JH, Zhang X, Du AJ et al (2008b) Self-etching reconstruction of hierarchically mesoporous F-TiO2 hollow microspherical photocatalyst for concurrent membrane water purifications. J Am Chem Soc 130:11256–11257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Papadaki M, Emery R, Abu-Hassan M et al (2004) Sonocatalytic oxidation processes for the removal of contaminants containing aromatic rings from aqueous effluents. Sep Purif Technol 34:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peng Z, Wu F, Deng N (2006) Photodegradation of bisphenol A in simulated lake water containing algae, humic acid and ferric ions. Environ Pollut 144:840–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perez-Aguilar NV, Munoz-Sandoval E, Diaz-Flores PE et al (2010) Adsorption of cadmium and lead onto oxidized nitrogen-doped multiwall carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution: equilibrium and kinetics. J Nanopart Res 12:467–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qiang Z, Nie Y, Ben W et al (2013) Degradation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals during activated sludge reduction by ozone. Chemosphere 91:366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schierenbeck A, Haase C, Räbiger N (2003) Degradation of halogenated hydrocarbons by the combined application of membrane filtration with a bioreactor. Eng Life Sci 3:263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strong PJ, Gapes DJ (2012) Thermal and thermo-chemical pre-treatment of four waste residues and the effect on acetic acid production and methane synthesis. Waste Manag 32:1669–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun X, Wang C, Li Y et al (2015) Treatment of phenolic wastewater by combined UF and NF/RO processes. Desalination 355:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Torres RA, Abdelmalek F, Combet E et al (2006) A comparative study of ultrasonic cavitation and Fenton’s reagent for bisphenol A degradation in natural waters. In: 1st European conference on environmental applications of advanced oxidation processes, e-proceedings, Chania Crete, Greece, September 2006Google Scholar
  48. Torres RA, Abdelmalek F, Combet E et al (2007) A comparative study of ultrasonic cavitation and Fenton’s reagent for bisphenol A degradation in deionized and natural waters. J Hazard Mater 146:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Upadhyayula VKK, Deng S, Mitchell MC et al (2009) Application of carbon nanotube technology for removal of contaminants in drinking water: a review. Sci Total Environ 408:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu J, Tang T, Zhang K et al (2011) Electroenzymatic catalyzed oxidation of bisphenol-A using HRP immobilized on magnetic silk fibroin nanoparticles. Process Biochem 46:1160–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xu R, Chi C, Li F et al (2013) Immobilization of horseradish peroxidase on electrospun microfibrous membranes for biodegradation and adsorption of bisphenol A. Bioresour Technol 149:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang X, Pan JH, Du AJ et al (2009) Combination of one dimensional TiO2 nanowire photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration for water treatment. Water Res 43:1179–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang SJ, Shao T, Bekaroglu SSK et al (2010) Adsorption of synthetic organic chemicals by carbon nanotubes: effects of background solution chemistry. Water Res 44:2067–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang T, Zhang X, Yan X et al (2011) Removal of BPA via a hybrid process combining oxidation on β-MnO2 nanowires with microfiltration. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 392:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magdalena ZIELIŃSKA
    • 1
    Email author
  • Irena WOJNOWSKA-BARYŁA
    • 1
  • Agnieszka CYDZIK-KWIATKOWSKA
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynOlsztynPoland

Personalised recommendations