Skip to main content

Psychology in Emerging Aesthetics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Old Melody in a New Song

Part of the book series: Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences ((THHSS))

Abstract

Aesthetics as a philosophical discipline was initiated by Alexander G. Baumgarten, who conceived it as a science of the lower faculties of experience or the study of sensual perception in general. This perspective changed, however, just one generation later, when aesthetics was defined in the narrower sense of a theory of beauty and the fine arts. Kant opposed the application of the term “aesthetics” to a critique of taste and suggested giving up this use of the term and applying it solely to transcendental aesthetics, as a true science, or employing it “partly in a transcendental, partly in a psychological signification”. In this sense, it was employed by H.D. Zschokke, still in the eighteenth century, but was systematically developed by G.T. Fechner in his Vorschule der Aesthetik in 1876. Based on Fechner’s concept of aesthetics as an empirical discipline, psychological aesthetics found extensive application in experimental psychology at the turn of the nineteenth to the twentieth century, but also strong opposition from the part of traditional philosophical aesthetics. At that time, the theory of Einfühlung (empathy) had been developed as the dominating theoretical fundament of psychological aesthetics. In the course of the twentieth century, different paradigmatic approaches were proposed, which for the most part reflected paradigmatic turns of psychology in general (e.g. phenomenology, Gestalt psychology, cognitive psychology).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unless indicated otherwise, all translations from German original texts into English are mine, C.A.).

  2. 2.

    Translation quoted from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16p/part1.html.

References

  • Allesch, C. G. (1987). Geschichte der psychologischen Ästhetik [History of psychological aesthetics]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (1989). Das Schöne als Gegenstand seelischer Intentionalität. Zu Brentanos deskriptiver Ästhetik und ihren problemgeschichtlichen Hintergründen. [Beauty as an object of mental intentionality. Brentano’s descriptive aesthetics and its background in conceptual history]. Brentano-Studien, 2, 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (2000). Form, Gestalt und Ethos in der Musik. Musik als Gegenstand der psychologischen Ästhetik [Form, gestalt, and ethos in music. Music as a subject of psychological aesthetics]. In A. Gerhard (Ed.), Musikwissenschaft – eine verspätete Disziplin? Die akademische Musikforschung zwischen Fortschrittsglauben und Modernitätsverweigerung (pp. 157–173). Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (2003). Zur Rezeption von Carl Stumpfs Tonpsychologie [On the reception of Carl Stumpf’s ‚Tonpsychologie‘]. In M. Kaiser-El-Safti, & M. Ballod (Eds.), Musik und Sprache. Zur Phänomenologie von Karl Stumpf (pp. 225–236). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (2004). Erfahrung als kreativer Prozess. Über die Bedeutung Rudolf Arnheims für die Rekonstruktion einer „psychologischen Ästhetik“ [Experience as a creative process. On the importance of Rudolf Arnheim for the reconstruction of a ‘psychological aesthetics’]. In C. G. Allesch, & O. Neumaier (Eds.), Rudolf Arnheim oder Die Kunst der Wahrnehmung (pp. 9–22). Vienna: Wiener Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (2006). Einführung in die psychologische Ästhetik [Introduction to psychological aesthetics]. Vienna: Wiener Universitätsverlag/UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (2014). An early concept of ‘Psychological Aesthetics’ in the ‘Age of Aesthetics’. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, 6, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (2017). Einfühlung—a key concept of psychological aesthetics. In V. Lux & S. Weigel (Eds.), Epistemic problems and cultural-historical perspectives of a cross-disciplinary concept (pp. 223–244). Basingstoke, GB: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G. (2018). Fechner’s Ästhetik - Intention und historische Hintergründe seines Werks. In G. T. Fechner, Vorschule der Aesthetik, ed. by C. G. Allesch (pp. 1-52). Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1949/2010). Toward a psychology of art. Collected essays. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1954/2004). Art and visual perception. A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1969/2004). Visual thinking (1969). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, A. G. (1735/1983). Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus [Philosophical meditations on some aspects of poems] (Latin/German; ed. by H. Paetzold). Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, A. G. (1750/2007). Ästhetik [Aesthetics] (Latin/German). Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt [Psychology from an empirical standpoint] (3 vols, pp. 1955–1968). Reprint. Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (1959). Grundzüge der Ästhetik (ed. by F. Mayer-Hillebrand). Bern: Franke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J. (1901). Allgemeine Ästhetik [General theory of aesthetics]. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J. (1904). Psychologische oder kritische Begründung der Ästhetik? [Psychological or critical foundation of aesthetics?]. Archiv für systematische Philosophie, 10, 131–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, B. (1902/1965). Aesthetic: as science of expression and general linguistic [transl. by D. Ainslie]. 10th printing, New York: Noonday Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessoir, M. (Ed.) (1925). Zweiter Kongreß für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft Berlin, 16.–18. Oktober 1924 [2nd Congress of aesthetics and general science of art, Berlin, October 16–18, 1924] [special issue]. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessoir, M. et al. (Ed.) (1914). Kongress für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft Berlin, 7.–8. Oktober 1913 [Congress of aesthetics and general science of art, Berlin, October 7–8, 1913]. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (Ed.). (2013). The psychology of music (3rd ed.). San Diego: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. T. (1871/1978). Zur experimentalen Aesthetik [On experimental aesthetics]. Abhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Math.-phys. Classe, 9 (pp. 553–635). Reprint. Hildesheim: Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik [Preschool of aesthetics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funch, B. S. (1997). The psychology of art appreciation. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, M. (1928/1976). Zugänge zur Ästhetik [Approaches to aesthetics]. In M. Geiger, Die Bedeutung der Kunst. Zugänge zu einer materialen Wertästhetik. Gesammelte, aus dem Nachlass ergänzte Schriften zur Ästhetik (ed. by K. Berger, & W. Henckmann). Munich: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E. v. (1886). Die deutsche Ästhetik seit Kant [German aesthetics since Kant]. Berlin: Duncker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781). Critik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of pure reason]. Riga: Hartknoch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787). Critik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of pure reason] (2nd ed.). Riga: Hartknoch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1940). Problems in the psychology of art. In R. Bernheimer et al. (Eds.), Art: A Bryn Mawr Symposium (pp. 179–273). Reprint. Bryn Mawr, PA. New York: Oriole 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Külpe, O. (1907). Der gegenwärtige Stand der experimentellen Ästhetik [The present state of experimental aesthetics]. In F. Schumann (Ed.), Bericht über den 2. Kongress für experimentelle Psychologie, Würzburg 1906. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, E. (1931/1991). Musikpsychologie [Music psychology]. Reprint Hildesheim: Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. (1896). Die geometrisch-optischen Täuschungen (Vorläufige Mitteilung) [The Geometrical-optical illusions (preliminary notice)]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 12, 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. (1897). Raumästhetik und geometrisch-optische Täuschungen [Spatial aesthetics and geometrical-optical illusions]. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. (1900). Aesthetische Einfühlung [Aesthetical empathy]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 22, 415–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. (1901). Einfühlung, innere Nachahmung und Organempfindungen [Empathy, inner imitation, and sense feelings]. Archiv für Psychologie, 1, 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. (1903/1906). Ästhetik—Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst [Aesthetics—Psychology of beauty and art], 2 vols., Hamburg: Voss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicus, F. (1917). Grundfragen der Ästhetik: Vorträge und Abhandlungen [Fundamental questions of aesthetics: speeches and treatises]. Jena: Diederichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meumann, E. (1903). Zur Einführung [Introduction]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 1, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prölß, R. (1878). Katechismus der Ästhetik. Belehrungen über die Wissenschaft vom Schönen und der Kunst [Catechism of aesthetics]. Leipzig: Weber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, E. (1963). The primary world of senses. A vindication of sensory experience. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer, J. G. (1771/1774). Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste [General theory of the fine arts], 2 vols. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erben und Reich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vischer, R. (1873/1927). Über das optische Formgefühl [On the optical sense of form]. In R. Vischer (Ed.), Drei Schriften zum ästhetischen Formproblem (pp. 1–44). Halle: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkelt, J. (1905–1914). System der Ästhetik [System of aesthetics], 3 vols. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkelt, J. (1920). Das ästhetische Bewusstsein. Prinzipienfragen der Ästhetik [Aesthetic consciousness: Questions of principles in aesthetics]. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1913). Die Psychologie im Kampf ums Dasein [Psychology’s struggle for existence]. Leipzig: Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian G. Allesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Allesch, C.G. (2018). Psychology in Emerging Aesthetics. In: Tateo, L. (eds) An Old Melody in a New Song. Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92339-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics