The Evolution of Farm Animal Biotechnology

  • Heiner NiemannEmail author
  • Bob SeamarkEmail author


The domestication of farm animals starting 12,000–15,000 years ago in the Middle East was a seminal achievement in human development that laid the foundation of agriculture as it is known today. Initially, domesticated animals were selected according to phenotype and/or specific traits adapted to a local climate and production system. The science-based breeding systems used today originated with the introduction of statistical methods in the sixteenth century that made possible a quantitative approach to selective breeding for specific targeted traits. Now, with the availability of accurate and reliable DNA analysis, this quantitative approach has been extended to DNA-based breeding concepts that allow a more cost-effective but still quantitative determination of a genomic breeding value (GBV) for individual animals.

The impact of these developments was dramatically enhanced with the introduction of reproductive technologies extending the genetic influence of superior individual animals. The first of these was artificial insemination (AI) that started to be developed in the late nineteenth century. Industry uptake of AI was initially slow but increased dramatically following the development of semen extenders, the reduction of venereal disease risk by inclusion of antibiotics, and most significantly the development of effective freezing and cryostorage procedures in the mid-twentieth century. AI is now used in most livestock breeding enterprises, most notably by the dairy industry where more than 90% of dairy cattle are produced through AI in countries with modern breeding structures.

Embryo transfer (ET), a technology that for the first time allowed exploitation of the female genetic pool, was made possible through the major advances in the biological sciences in the later part of the twentieth century. Advances in understanding of the reproductive cycle and its hormonal control, the availability of purified gonadotropins, and improved cell and embryo culture procedures all played significant roles. ET is now being increasingly implemented in top end breeding endeavors, particularly in the top 1–2% of a given cattle population. But its real impact is yet to come as ET is the key enabler in the introduction of the next generation of enhanced breeding technologies. ET has already played a key role in advances such as in vitro production of embryos, sexing, cloning, and transgenesis. With the birth of “Dolly,” the cloned sheep, in 1996, a century-old dogma in biology, which inferred that a differentiated cell cannot be reprogrammed into a pluripotent stage, was abolished. Today, through recent developments in molecular cell biology, available protocols are efficient enough to allow commercial application of somatic cloning in the major farm animal species. This will not only further enhance the rate of genetic gain in herds and flocks but through the recent advent of precise genome editing tools allow the production of novel germlines for agricultural and biomedical purposes through the capacity to genetically modify farm animals with targeted modifications with high efficiency. This paves the way for the introduction of the precision breeding concepts needed to respond to future challenges in animal breeding, stemming from matching the demands of ongoing hyperbolic human population growth to the limited availability of arable land and environmental constraints.


Domestication Selective breeding Quantitative trait loci (QTL) Marker-assisted selection (MAS) Genomic maps Genomic breeding value (GBV) Artificial insemination (AI) Embryo transfer (ET) Freezing of gametes and embryos In vitro fertilization (IVF) Somatic cloning Transgenesis Gene editing Precision breeding Future challenges in food production 


  1. Bavister BD (2002) Early history of in vitro fertilization. Reproduction 124:181–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beja-Pereira A, Caramelli D, Lallueza-Fox C et al (2006) The origin of European cattle: evidence from modern and ancient DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:8113–8118PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betteridge KJ (2003) A history of farm animal embryo transfer and some associated techniques. Anim Reprod Sci 79:203–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biedl A, Peters H, Hofstätter R (1922) Experimentelle Studien über die Einnistung und Weiterentwicklung des Eies im Uterus. Z Geburtshilfe Gynäk 84:59–103Google Scholar
  5. Blasco A, Toro MA (2014) A short critical history of the application of genomics to animal breeding. Livest Sci 166:4–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brackett BG, Bousquet D, Boice ML, Donawick W, Evans JF, Dressel MA (1982) Normal development following in vitro fertilization in the cow. Biol Reprod 27:147–158PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford MW, Bradley DG, Luikart G (2003) DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat Rev Genet 4:900–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briggs R, King TJ (1952) Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frogs’ eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 38:455–463PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA et al (1996) Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380:64–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmichael RA (1980) History of international embryo transfer society I. Theriogenology 13:3–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang MC (1947) Normal development of fertilized rabbit ova stored at low temperature for several days. Nature 159:602–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang MC (1959) Fertilization of rabbit ova in vitro. Nature 179:466–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang MC (1968) Reciprocal insemination and egg transfer between ferrets and mink. J Exp Zool 168:49–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng WTK, Polge C, Moor RM (1986) In vitro fertilization of pig and sheep oocytes. Theriogenology 25:146 (abstr)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cibelli J, Stice SL, Golueke PJ et al (1998) Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 280:1256–1258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Comizzoli P, Holt WV (2014) Recent advances and prospects in germplasm preservation of rare and endangered species. Adv Exp Med Biol 753:331–356PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Comizzoli P, Mermillod P, Mauget R (2000) Reproductive biotechnologies for endangered mammalian species. Reprod Nutr Dev 40:493–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connolly J, Colledge S, Dobney K et al (2011) Meta-analysis of zooarchaelogical data from SW Asia and SE Europe provides insight into the origins and spread of animal husbandry. J Archeol Sci 38:538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cran DG, Johnson LA, Miller NGA, Cochrane D, Polge C (1993) Production of bovine calves following separation of X- and Y-chromosome bearing sperm and in vitro fertilization. Vet Rec 132:40–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dekkers J (2004) Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. J Anim Sci 82(E.Suppl):E313–E328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Diamond J (2002) Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418:700–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards RG, Steptoe PC (1978) Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet312:366Google Scholar
  23. Edwards RG, Bavister BD, Steptoe PC (1969) Early stages of fertilization in vitro of human oocytes matured in vitro. Nature 221:632–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. European Society of Human Reproduction (ESHRE) (2009) ART fact sheet. In: Embryology ESHRE. European Society of Human Reproduction (ESHRE), 2009Google Scholar
  25. Fekete E, Little CC (1942) Observations on the mammary tumor incidence of mice born from transferred ova. Cancer Res 2:525–530Google Scholar
  26. Foote RH (1996) Review: dairy cattle reproductive physiology research and management – past progress and future prospects. J Dairy Sci 79:980–990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foote RH, Bratton RW (1950) The fertility of bovine semen in extenders containing sulfanilamide, penicillin, streptomycin and polymyxin. J Dairy Sci 33(8):544–547Google Scholar
  28. Fukuda Y, Ichikawa M, Naito K, Toyoda Y (1990) Birth of normal calves resulting from bovine oocytes matured, fertilized, and cultured with cumulus cells in vitro up to the blastocyst stage. Biol Reprod 42:114–119PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. García-Sancho M (2015) Animal breeding in the age of biotechnology: the investigative pathway behind the cloning of Dolly the sheep. HPLS 37:282–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garner DL, Seidel GE Jr (2008) History of commercializing sexed semen in cattle. Theriogenology 69:886–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerbault P, Allaby RG, Boivin N et al (2014) Storytelling and story testing in domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:6159–6164PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gianola D, Rosa GJM (2015) One hundred years of statistical developments in animal breeding. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 3:19–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gonen S, Jenko J, Gorjanc G et al (2017) Potential of gene drives with genome editing to increase genetic gain in livestock breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol 49:3. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Groenen MAM (2016) A decade of pig genome sequencing: a window on pig domestication and evolution. Genet Sel Evol 48:23. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Groeneveld LF, Lenstra JA, Eding H et al (2010) Genetic diversity in farm animals – a review. Anim Genet 41:6–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gurdon JB (1960) The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from differentiating endoderm cells of Xenopus laevis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 8:505–526PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Gurdon JB (1962) The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J Embryol Exp Morphol 10:622–640PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Gurdon JB (2017) Nuclear transplantation, the conservation of the genome, and prospects for cell replacement. FEBS J 284:211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gurdon JB, Uehlinger V (1966) “Fertile” intestine nuclei. Nature 210:1240–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hammer RE, Palmiter RD, Pursel VG et al (1985) Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection. Nature 315:680–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hartman CG, Lewis WH, Miller FW et al (1931) First findings of tubal ova in the cow, together with notes on oestrus. Anat Rec 48:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hayes BJ, Lewin HA, Goddard ME (2013) The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. Trends Genet 29:206–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heape W (1891) Preliminary note on the transplantation and growth of mammalian ova within a uterine foster mother. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 48:457–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heape W (1897) The artificial insemination of mammals and subsequent possible fertilization or impregnation of their ova. Proc R Soc Lond B 61:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R (2002) Monoclonal mice generated by nuclear transfer from mature B and T donor cells. Nature 415:1035–1038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2011) Fertility treatment in 2011: trends and figures in UK: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA)Google Scholar
  47. Illmensee K, Hoppe PC (1981) Nuclear transplantation in Mus musculus: developmental potential of nuclei from preimplantation embryos. Cell 23:9–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson MH (2011) Robert Edwards: the path to IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 23:245–262PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson LA, Flook JP, Hawk HW (1989) Sex selection in rabbits: live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. Biol Reprod 41:199–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kellis M, Wold B, Snyder M (2014) Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 17:6131–6138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kinney GM, Pennycook JW, Schriver MD et al (1979) Surgical collection and transfer of canine embryos. Biol Reprod 20:96AGoogle Scholar
  52. Kraemer DC, Moore GT, Kramen MA (1976) Baboon infant produced by embryo transfer. Science 192:1246–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kues WA, Sudheer S, Herrmann D et al (2008) Genome-wide expression profiling reveals distinct clusters of transcriptional regulation during bovine preimplantation development in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19768–19773PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kvasnitski AV (1951) Interbreed ova transplantations (in Russian). Soc Zooteckh 1:36–42 (Anim Breed Abstr 19:224)Google Scholar
  55. Kvasnitski AV (2001) Research on interbreed ova transfer in pigs. Theriogenology 56:1285–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Laible G, Wei J, Wagner S (2015) Improving livestock for agriculture – technological progress from random transgenesis to precision genome editing heralds a new area. Biotechnol J 10:109–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Larson G, Albarella U, Dobney K et al (2007) Ancient DNA, pig domestication, and the spread of the Neolithic into Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:15276–15281PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu Z, Cai Y, Wang Y (2018) Cloning of macaque monkeys by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell 172:881–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lopyrin AI, Loginova NV, Karpov PL (1950) Changes in the exterior of lambs as a result of interbreed embryonic transfer (in Russian). Dokl Adad Nouk SSSR Ser Biol 74:1019–1021 (Anim Breed Abstr 19, Abstr 1262)Google Scholar
  60. Lopyrin AI, Loginova NV, Karpov PL (1951) The effect of changed conditions during embryogenesis on the growth and development of lambs (in Russian). Sov Zootheh 6:83–95 (Anim Breed Abstr 20, Abstr 729)Google Scholar
  61. McGrath J, Solter D (1983) Nuclear transplantation in mouse embryos. J Exp Zool 228:355–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McGrath J, Solter D (1984) Inability of mouse blastomere nuclei transferred to enucleated zygotes to support development in vitro. Science 226:1317–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McHugh DE, Bradley DG (2001) Livestock genetic origins: goats buck the trend. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:5382–5384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McLaren A, Biggers JD (1958) Successful development and birth of mice cultivated in vitro as early embryos. Nature 182:877–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Miller FW, Swett WW, Hartman CG et al (1931) A study of ova from the Fallopian tubes of dairy cows, with a genital history of the cows. J Agric Res 43:627–636Google Scholar
  67. Mutter LR, Graden AP, Olds D (1964) Successful non-surgical bovine embryo transfer. AI Digest 12:3Google Scholar
  68. Nicholas JS (1933) Development of transplanted rat eggs. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 30:1111–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Niemann H (2014) Epigenetics of cloned livestock embryos and offspring. In: Cibelli J, Gurdon J, Wilmut I, Jaenisch R, Lanza R, West MD, KHS C (eds) Principles of cloning. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 453–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Niemann H (2016) Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian species after SCNT-based cloning. Theriogenology 86:80–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Niemann H, Tian XC, King WA et al (2008) Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reproduction 135:151–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Niemann H, Kues WA, Lucas-Hahn A et al (2011) Somatic cloning and epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. In: Atala A, Lanza R, Thomson JA, Nerem R (eds) Principles of regenerative medicine. Elsevier., ISBN: 978-0123814227, Amsterdam, pp 129–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nowak-Imialek M, Niemann H (2012) Pluripotent cells in farm animals: state of the art and future perspectives. Reprod Fertil Dev 25:103–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Oguri N, Tsutsumi Y (1974) Non-surgical egg transfer in mares. J Reprod Fertil 41:313–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ombelet W, van Robays J (2015) Artificial insemination history: hurdles and milestones. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 7:137–143PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Orland B (2017) The invention of artificial fertilization in the eighteenth and nineteenth century. Hist Philos Life Sci 39:11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Perry G (2017) 2016 statistics of embryo collection and transfer in domestic farm animals. IETS Newsletter 37:8–18Google Scholar
  78. Petersen B, Niemann H (2015) Molecular scissors and their application in genetically modified farm animals. Transgenic Res 24:381–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pincus G (1930) Observations on the living eggs of the rabbit. Proc R Soc Lond B 107:132–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pincus G, Kirsch RE (1936) The sterility in rabbits produced by injections of oestrone and related compounds. Am J Phys 115:219–228Google Scholar
  81. Polge C (2007) The work of the animal research station, Cambridge. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:511–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Polge C, Smith AU, Parkes AS (1949) Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 164(4172):666Google Scholar
  83. Prather RS, Barnes FL, Sims MM et al (1987) Nuclear transplantation in the bovine embryo: assessment of donor nuclei and recipient oocyte. Biol Reprod 37:859–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rothschild MF, Plastow G (2014) Applications of genomics to improve livestock in the developing world. Livest Sci 166:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schafberg R, Swalve HH (2015) The history of breeding for polled cattle. Livest Sci 179:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schriver MD, Kraemer DC (1978) Embryo transfer in the domestic feline. Am Ass Lab Anim Sci Publ 78–4:12Google Scholar
  87. Schultz H (1980) History of the international embryo transfer society II. Theriogenology 13:7–11PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Shendure J, Balasubramanian S, Church GM et al (2017) DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future. Nature 550:345–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sims M, First NL (1994) Production of calves by transfer of nuclei from cultured inner cell mass cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:6143–6147PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spemann H (1938) Embryonic development and induction. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp 373–398Google Scholar
  91. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG (1978) Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet ii:366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Boulet SL, Warner L, Barfield WD (2018) Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 16:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Telugu BP, Donovan DM, Mark B et al (2016) Genome editing to the rescue: sustainably feeding 10 billion global human population. NIB J.
  95. Telugu BP, Park KE, Park CH (2017) Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications. Mamm Genome 28:338–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thibier M (2008) Data retrieval committee statistics of embryo transfer – year 2007. IETS Newsletter 26:4–9Google Scholar
  97. Tsunoda Y, Yasui T, Shioda Y et al (1987) Full-term development of mouse blastomere nuclei transplanted into enucleated two-cell embryos. J Exp Zool 242:147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW et al (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291:1304–1351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vishwanath R (2003) Artificial insemination: the state of the art. Theriogenology 59:571–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M et al (1998) Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394:369–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wang GD, Xie HB, Penb MS et al (2014) Domestication genomics: evidence from animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2:65–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Warwick BL, Berry RO (1949) Inter-generic and intra-specific embryo transfers in sheep and goats. J Hered 40:297–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Warwick BL, Berry RO, Horlacher WR (1934) Results of mating rams to Angora female goats. In: Proc 27th Ann Meet Am Soc Anim Prod, pp 225–227Google Scholar
  104. Weissmann A (1893) The germ-plasm: a theory of heredity. Translated by W. Newton Parker and Harriet Rönnfeldt. Scribner, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Whittingham DG (1971) Survival of mouse embryos after freezing and thawing. Nature 233:125–126PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. Willadsen SM (1986) Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 320:63–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Willett EL, Black WG, Casida LH et al (1951) Successful transplantation of a fertilized bovine ovum. Science 113:247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wilmut I, Rowson LE (1973) Experiments on the low-temperature preservation of cow embryos. Vet Rec 92:686–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wilmut I, Taylor J (2018) Cloning after Dolly. Cell Reprogram 20:1–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J et al (1997) Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zeder MA, Bradeley DG, Emshwiller E et al (2006) Documenting domestication: new genetic and archaeological paradigms. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Farm Animal Genetics (FLI)Neustadt-MarienseeGermany
  2. 2.Department of Medical BiochemistryFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations