Skip to main content
  • 574 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we demonstrate that when an individual’s network information is available, we can use the characteristics of network structure to improve the predictive validity when predicting consumer behavior (even in out of sample predictions). However, network structure measures are determined by the network itself, and network is the result of individual’s social interactions which is determined by individual characteristics. So we have to develop a structure model of consumer behavior within a network to address the related endogeneity issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Iyengar, Raghuram, Asim Ansari, Sunil Gupta. 2007. A model of consumer learning for service quality and usage. Journal of Marketing Research 44(4) 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grubb, Michael D. 2012. Dynamic nonlinear pricing: biased expectations, inattention, and bill shock. International Journal of Industrial Organization 30(3) 287–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ascarza, Eva, Anja Lambrecht, Naufel Vilcassim. 2012. When talk is free: The effect of tariff structure on usage under two-and three-part tariffs. Journal of Marketing Research 49(6) 882–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gopalakrishnan, Arun, Raghuram Iyengar, Robert J Meyer. 2014. Consumer dynamic usage allocation and learning under multipart tariffs. Marketing Science 34(1) 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, Lung-Fei. 2007. Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics 140(2) 333–374.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bramoullé, Yann, Habiba Djebbari, Bernard Fortin. 2009. Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of econometrics 150(1) 41–55.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, Xu. 2010. Identifying peer effects in student academic achievement by spatial autoregressive models with group unobservables. Journal of Labor Economics 28(4) 825–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh, Chih-Sheng, Lung-Fei Lee. 2016. A social interactions model with endogenous friendship formation and selectivity. Journal of Applied Econometrics 31(2) 301–319.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill, Shawndra, Foster Provost, Chris Volinsky. 2006. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statistical Science 256–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Tucker, Catherine. 2008. Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Science 54(12) 2024–2038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldenberg, Jacob, Sangman Han, Donald R Lehmann, Jae Weon Hong. 2009. The role of hubs in the adoption process. Journal of Marketing 73(2) 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nair, Harikesh S, Puneet Manchanda, Tulikaa Bhatia. 2010. Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. Journal of Marketing Research 47(5) 883–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Trusov, Michael, Anand V Bodapati, Randolph E Bucklin. 2010. Determining influential users in internet social networks. Journal of Marketing Research 47(4) 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stephen, Andrew T, Olivier Toubia. 2010. Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of marketing research 47(2) 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinz, Oliver, Bernd Skiera, Christian Barrot, Jan U Becker. 2011. Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing 75(6) 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Katona, Zsolt, Peter Pal Zubcsek, Miklos Sarvary. 2011. Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. Journal of Marketing Research 48(3) 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iyengar, Raghuram, Christophe Van den Bulte, Thomas W Valente. 2011. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science 30(2) 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Narayan, Vishal, Vithala R Rao, Carolyne Saunders. 2011. How peer influence affects attribute preferences: A bayesian updating mechanism. Marketing Science 30(2) 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nitzan, Irit, Barak Libai. 2011. Social effects on customer retention. Journal of Marketing 75(6) 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ugander, Johan, Lars Backstrom, Cameron Marlow, Jon Kleinberg. 2012. Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(16) 5962–5966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoganarasimhan, Hema. 2012. Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using youtube data. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 10(1) 111–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson, Matthew O., Leeat Yariv. 1996. Social networks and the diffusion of economic behavior. Yale Economic Review 3(2) 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jackson, Matthew O, Brian W Rogers. 2007. Relating network structure to diffusion properties through stochastic dominance. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 7(1).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bampo, Mauro, Michael T Ewing, Dineli R Mather, David Stewart, Mark Wallace. 2008. The effects of the social structure of digital networks on viral marketing performance. Information Systems Research 19(3) 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Centola, Damon. 2010. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329(5996) 1194–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eagle, Nathan, Michael Macy, Rob Claxton. 2010. Network diversity and economic development. Science 328(5981) 1029–1031.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Dover, Yaniv, Jacob Goldenberg, Daniel Shapira. 2012. Network traces on penetration: Uncovering degree distribution from adoption data. Marketing Science 31(4) 689–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Libai, Barak, Eitan Muller, Renana Peres. 2013. Decomposing the value of word-of-mouth seeding programs: Acceleration versus expansion. Journal of marketing research 50(2) 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schlereth, Christian, Christian Barrot, Bernd Skiera, Carsten Takac. 2013. Optimal product sampling strategies in social networks: How many and whom to target? International Journal of Electronic Commerce 18(1) 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peres, Renana. 2014. The impact of network characteristics on the diffusion of innovations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 402 330–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aral, Sinan, Dylan Walker. 2014. Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Science 60(6) 1352–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bramoullé, Yann, Rachel Kranton, Martin D’Amours. 2014. Strategic interaction and networks. The American Economic Review 104(3) 898–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Coleman, James S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Burt, Ronald S. 1993. The social structure of competition. Explorations in economic sociology 65: 103.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nahapiet, Janine, Sumantra Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review 23(2) 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Glaeser, Edward L, David I Laibson, Jose A Scheinkman, Christine L Soutter. 2000. Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 811–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Karlan, Dean, Markus Mobius, Tanya Rosenblat, Adam Szeidl. 2009. Trust and social collateral. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3) 1307–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Young, H Peyton. 2009. Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: Contagion, social influence, and social learning. The American economic review 99(5) 1899–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lazarsfeld, Paul F, Robert K Merton, et al. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and control in modern society 18(1) 18–66.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Blondel, Vincent D, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment 2008(10) P10008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Manski, Charles F. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The review of economic studies 60(3) 531–542.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Hoxby, Caroline. 2000. Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hanushek, Eric A, John F Kain, Jacob M Markman, Steven G Rivkin. 2003. Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of applied econometrics 18(5) 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fletcher, Jason M. 2010. Social interactions and smoking: Evidence using multiple student cohorts, instrumental variables, and school fixed effects. Health Economics 19(4) 466–484.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Mundlak, Yair. 1978. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society 69–85.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Chamberlain, Gary. 1982. Multivariate regression models for panel data. Journal of Econometrics 18(1) 5–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul, Guido W Imbens. 2013. Social networks and the identification of peer effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 31(3) 253–264.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang, Sha, Greg M Allenby. 2003. Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research 40(3) 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hoff, Peter D, Adrian E Raftery, Mark S Handcock. 2002. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the american Statistical association 97(460) 1090–1098.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Navarro, Salvador. 2008. Control functions. The new Palgrave dictionary of economics.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society 153–161.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Olsen, Randall J. 1980. A least squares correction for selectivity bias. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1815–1820.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Hartmann, Wesley R, Puneet Manchanda, Harikesh Nair, Matthew Bothner, Peter Dodds, David Godes, Kartik Hosanagar, Catherine Tucker. 2008. Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing letters 19(3–4) 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Snijders, Tom, Christian Steglich, Michael Schweinberger. 2007. Modeling the coevolution of networks and behavior. Han Oud Kees van Montfort, Albert Satorra, eds., Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, 41–71.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Robins, Garry, Tom Snijders, Peng Wang, Mark Handcock, Philippa Pattison. 2007. Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social networks 29(2) 192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ouyang, Y., Hu, M., Huet, A., Li, Z. (2018). Network Based Targeting. In: Mining Over Air: Wireless Communication Networks Analytics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92312-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92312-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92311-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92312-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics