Advertisement

The Brick Labyrinth

  • Luka PiškorecEmail author
  • David Jenny
  • Stefana Parascho
  • Hannes Mayer
  • Fabio Gramazio
  • Matthias Kohler
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents a project developed within the Master of Advanced Studies in Architecture and Digital Fabrication programme at ETH Zurich. The Brick Labyrinth is the first large-scale construction built in the Robotic Fabrication Laboratory, a unique multi-robotic setup for automated prefabrication at architectural scale. The project continues the tradition of robotic brick laying started at Gramazio Kohler Research but increases the significance of computational design and robotic control by solely working with a dry-stacked construction method. The paper introduces the design methodology, the computational framework and the robotic fabrication setup and addresses the structural challenges of the constructive system. It introduces strategies for an automated multi-robotic brick laying process at large-scale including custom-made robotic end-effectors to increase the speed of the process. The unique setup of the project and its material system demonstrate a fully reversible construction process at architectural scale, suggesting a new approach to physical prototyping, which could fundamentally change the way we design buildings. While this paper highlights the design explorations leading towards the final structure – featuring the development of a flexible dry-stacked brick bond and its potential to create unique spatial sequences – it also provides an outlook on how the integration of computational tools into automated fabrication processes can lead to new design typologies.

Keywords

Digital Fabrication Computational design Robotic fabrication Robotic brick laying Stability analysis Dry-stacked masonry Labyrinth 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Brick Labyrinth described in this paper was developed and built as a design and fabrication project of the Master of Advanced Studies in Architecture and Digital Fabrication at ETH Zurich in June 2017. The programme is run jointly by Gramazio Kohler Research and Digital Building Technologies and directed by Hannes Mayer.

The project was developed and executed by the students of the MAS year 2016/2017: Marco Caprani, Samuel Cros, Rodrigo Diaz, Ahmed Elshafei, Federico Giacomarra, Hakim Hasan, Marirena Kladeftira, Iakovina Kontiza, Thodoris Kyttas, Matthias Leschok, Coralie Ming, Wataru Nagatomo, Matteo Pacher, Maria Pachi, Sambit Samant, Theodora Spathi and Dai-Syuan Wu. The team of researchers and tutors consisted of Luka Piškorec, David Jenny and Stefana Parascho, with Hannes Mayer. Students were mentored by Prof. Fabio Gramazio, Prof. Matthias Kohler and Prof. Benjamin Dillenburger. Special thanks goes to the RFL technicians Michael Lyrenmann and Philippe Fleischmann and Andreas Reusser from IfB, as well as to our sponsor Keller AG Ziegeleien for supplying the bricks and for the long research partnership in robotic brick building.

References

  1. 1.
    MAS DFAB homepage. https://www.masdfab.com/program. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  2. 2.
    Robotic Fabrication Laboratory (2010–2016). http://dfab.arch.ethz.ch/web/forschung/e/0/0/0/186.html. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  3. 3.
    Bonwetsch, T., Kobel, D., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M.: The informed wall: applying additive digital fabrication techniques on architecture. In: Luhan, G.A., Anzalone, P., Cabrinha, M., Clarke, C. (eds.) Acadia 2006: Synthetic Landscapes, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 489–495. Louisville (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bärtschi, R., Knauss, M., Bonwetsch, T., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M.: The wiggled brick bond. In: Ceccato, C., Hesselgren, L., Pauly, M., Pottmann, H., Wallner, J. (eds.) Advances in Architectural Geometry 2010, pp. 137–147. Springer, Vienna (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Photograph showing the work of Richard Serra: Inside Out. http://niezlasztuka.net/o-sztuce/richard-serra-rzezbiarz-blednika/. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  6. 6.
    Plan of the Knossos palace complex from Baikie, James: The Sea-kings of Crete, Adam and Charles Black, London (1910)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borges, J.L.: The Two Kings and the Two Labyrinths (1939), The Library of Babel (1941) and The House of Asterion (1947)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Mele, T., Liew, A., Méndez Echenagucia, T., Rippmann, M., et al.: COMPAS: a framework for computational research in architecture and structures, GitHub repository. https://compas-dev.github.io/. Accessed 08 May 2018
  9. 9.
    McNeel: Rhinoceros. https://www.rhino3d.com/. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  10. 10.
    McNeel: Grasshopper. http://www.grasshopper3d.com/. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  11. 11.
    The mesh is implemented as a half-edge data structure. It is meant for the representation of polygonal “surface” meshes. https://compas-dev.github.io. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  12. 12.
    The network is a connectivity graph. It is meant for the representation of networks of vertices connected by edges. https://compas-dev.github.io. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  13. 13.
    ABB: ABB RobotStudio. http://new.abb.com/products/robotics/de/robotstudio. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  14. 14.
    Universal Robotics: UR5. https://www.universal-robots.com/products/ur5-robot/. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  15. 15.
    Bonwetsch, T.: Robotically assembled brickwork, Manipulating assembly processes of discrete elements. Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ROB Technologies. https://rob-technologies.com/. Accessed 08 Mar 2018
  17. 17.
    Keller AG Ziegeleien. http://www.keller-ziegeleien.ch/de. Accessed 09 Mar 2018
  18. 18.
    Owano, N.: Bricklaying robot can make ergonomic, economic impact on construction sites. TechExplore, 21 April 2017. https://techxplore.com/pdf411970087.pdf. Accessed 07 May 2018
  19. 19.
    Dörfler, K., Sandy, T., Giftthaler, M., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., Buchli, J.: Mobile robotic brickwork. In: Reinhardt, D., Saunders, R., Burry, J. (eds.) Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2016, pp. 204–217. Springer, Switzerland (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giftthaler, M., Sandy, T., Dörfler, K., Brooks, I., Buckingham, M., Rey, G., Kohler, M., Gramazio, F., Buchli, J.: Mobile robotic fabrication at 1:1 scale: the In situ Fabricator: system, experiences and current developments. J. Constr. Rob. 1, 3–14 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keating, S., Spielberg, N., Klein, J., Oxman, N.: A compound arm approach to digital construction. In: McGee, W., Ponce de Leon, M. (eds.) Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2014, pp. 99–110. Springer, Switzerland (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keating, S., Leland, J., Cai, L., Oxman, N.: Towards site-specific and self-sufficient robotic fabrication on architectural scales. Sci. Rob. 2(5) (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lim, S., Buswell, R.A., Le, T.T., Austin, S.A., Gibb, A.G.F., Thorpe, T.: Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom. Constr. 21(1), 262–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Minibuilders: IaaC Barcelona (2014). http://robots.iaac.net/. Accessed 09 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luka Piškorec
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Jenny
    • 2
  • Stefana Parascho
    • 2
  • Hannes Mayer
    • 2
  • Fabio Gramazio
    • 2
  • Matthias Kohler
    • 2
  1. 1.Aalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Gramazio Kohler ResearchETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations