Advertisement

Digital Composites: Robotic 3D Printing of Continuous Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastics for Functionally-Graded Building Components

  • Hyunchul KwonEmail author
  • Martin Eichenhofer
  • Thodoris Kyttas
  • Benjamin Dillenburger
Conference paper

Abstract

Carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic (CFRP) can impact the built environment significantly. In addition to its extraordinary weight-to-strength ratio, CFRP provides numerous benefits in architecture, including its plasticity and aesthetics. In theory, CFRP can take any shape, but the fabrication constraints of mold making currently limit the design. The mold is the most resource-intensive element of CFRP fabrication, and it is particularly challenging and costly for the bespoke non-standard shapes, which are often found in architecture. This research presents a novel approach to utilizing robotic three-dimensional printing (3DP) to make CFRP materials accessible in architecture by combining layered 3DP of neat polymers with add-on 3DP of CFRP materials. This paper begins by providing background information and an overview of state-of-the-art CFRP fabrication. It then outlines the challenges related to the fabrication process and design of 3DP CFRP building components. Taking into account the design parameters, material properties and fabrication constraints, the paper describes the fabrication process development, computational design tool development and demonstrative physical experiment. The presented research is the first part of an interdisciplinary research involving architecture and mechanical engineering in order to investigate the potential for large-scale mold-less fabrication of CFRP components.

Keywords

Carbon fiber-reinforced plastics Computerized materials and structures Robotic 3D printing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank a number of partners and collaborators whose dedication helped us fulfill the research described in this paper:

• Andrei Jipa, Pietro Odaglia, Dr Mania Aghaei Meibodi and the rest of the Digital Building Technologies personnel at ETH Zurich

• Professor Dr Paolo Ermanni (CMASLab, ETH Zurich)

• David Jenny (Gramazio Kohler Research, ETH Zurich)

• Michael Lyrenmann and Philippe Fleischmann (technical support, ETH Zurich)

• Ma Xijie (student assistant, ETH Zurich)

• 9T Labs, Extrudr (industry partners) and HAL Robotics (software support)

This research is supported by the NCCR Digital Fabrication, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (NCCR Digital Fabrication Agreement #51NF40-141853).

References

  1. 1.
    Whalley, A.: The Eden Project glass houses world environments. In: Barnes, M., Dickson, M. (eds.) Widespan Roof Structures, pp. 75–84. Thomas Telford, London (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones, R.M.: Mechanics of Composite Materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung, D.D., Chung, D.: Carbon Fiber Composites. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mallick, P.K. (ed.): Composites Engineering Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lynn, G.: Good-bye tectonics, Hello composites. In: Bell, M.J., Buckley, C. (eds.) Permanent Change: Plastics in Architecture and Engineering, pp. 86–111. Princeton Architectural Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foster + Partners Homepage. https://www.fosterandpartners.com/projects/steve-jobs-theater/. Accessed 09 Mar 2018
  7. 7.
    Prudon, T.H.: From boat to bust: the Monsanto House revisited. In: Bell, M.J., Buckley, C. (eds.) Permanent Change: Plastics in Architecture and Engineering, pp. 60–67. Princeton Architectural Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Åkermo, M., Åström, B.T.: Modelling component cost in compression moulding of thermoplastic composite and sandwich components. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 31(4), 319–333 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pronk, A., van Rooy, I., Schinkel, P.: Double-curved surfaces using a membrane mould. In: Domingo, A., Lazaro, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures Symposium (IASS): IASS 50th Anniversary: Evolution and Trends in Design, Analysis and Construction of Shell and Spatial Structures, pp. 618–628. Valencia (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chawla, K.K.: Composite Materials: Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doerstelmann, M., Knippers, J., Koslowski, V., Menges, A., Prado, M., Schieber, G., Vasey, L.: ICD/ITKE research pavilion 2014–15: fibre placement on a pneumatic body based on a water spider web. Archit. Des. 85(5), 60–65 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ryder, G., Ion, B., Green, G., Harrison, D., Wood, B.: Rapid design and manufacture tools in architecture. Autom. Constr. 11(3), 279–290 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jipa, A., Bernhard, M., Ruffray, N., Wangler, T., Flatt, R., Dillenburger, B.: skelETHon formwork. In: Proceedings of the XXI Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics (SIGraDi): Resilience Design, pp. 22–24. Concepción, Chile (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peters, B.: Solar bytes pavilion. In: Reinhardt, D., Saunders, R., Burry, J. (eds.) Robotic Fabrication Architecture, Art and Design 2016, pp. 327–337. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tam, K.M.M., Coleman, J.R., Fine, N.W., Mueller, C.T.: Robotics-enabled stress line additive manufacturing. In: Reinhardt, D., Saunders, R., Burry, J. (eds.) Robotic Fabrication Architecture, Art and Design 2016, pp. 350–361. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holshouser, C., Newell, C., Palas, S., Love, L.J., Kunc, V., Lind, R.F., Peter, W.H.: Out of bounds additive manufacturing. Adv. Mater. Process. 171(3), 15–17 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Biswas, K., Lind, R., Post, B., Jackson, R., Love, L., Green Jr, J., Guerguis, A.M.: Big area additive manufacturing applied to buildings. In: Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XIII International Conference, pp. 583–590. Clearwater, FL (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mark, G.T., Gozdz, A.S.: U.S. Patent No. 9,579,851. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eichenhofer, M., Wong, J.C., Ermanni, P.: Continuous lattice fabrication of ultra-lightweight composite structures. Addit. Manuf. 18, 48–57 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pottmann, H.: Architectural geometry as design knowledge. Archit. Des. 80(4), 72–77 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller, F.: U.S. Patent No. 5,094,051. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Digital Building TechnologiesETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Laboratory of Composite Materials and Adaptive StructuresETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations