Abstract
In the laser homogenization experiment, there is a difference between the output from the pre-design and the output from the actual experiment. This is because, apart from the design mistake, the mistake of some lens placement during the lens assembly process greatly affects the final result. Unless there is a way to automate the alignment of all the lenses from the beginning, the only way to find and fix these errors is to re-arrange all the lenses. In this paper, we propose a new error verification method. To accomplish this, we first store all the output that can occur due to the change of the lens arrangement during the simulation process, and then use the machine learning to connect the relationship between the output images obtained from the actual experiment and the previously obtained data.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The laser is amplified by inductive emission and is used in various applications such as energy, new materials, semiconductors, and medical care required in the 21st century. In order to obtain a high output laser, Handong Intense Laser Lab (HILL) is studying to make the beam bundle into a rectangular parallelepiped shape (Fig. 1) for even energy distribution of the medium [1,2,3].
For Laser Beam Homogenizing experiment, several mirrors and lenses are used. However, unlike the mathematical approach, the results obtained through actual experiments are often different from those expected. The reason is that the laser, also referred to as the light, has the property which allows it to easily interfere with the surrounding environment. In this study, we propose a method to help the error verification and adjustment of experimental setup based on the case when the adjustment of each module (mirror, lens, etc.) is wrong. To do this, we try to learn the output images based on the parameters of the module through the deep learning algorithm and find out which output image of the experiment matches with the image using the parameters.
2 Problem Description
As mentioned above, there are several parameters (focal length, mirror angle and so on) that are required for experimental setup for homogenizing. Figure 2(a) and (c) show the result when the focal length of the lens is different, and the remaining parameters are the same. And, (a) and (b) use the same focal length (FC) lens but different position of CCD camera for image sensing.
As can be seen from the results, some of the changes in some parameters result in different overall results. In particular, the parameters used in the experiments are the position and angle values of each module (two mirrors and four lenses, one lens array, and CCD) as shown again in Fig. 1. However, in order to adjust a total of 16 parameters, it must pass through the human hand. There are other ways to tune through the machine, but the installation cost is very expensive, and the possibility of machine failure is not negligible. It is almost impossible to adjust 16 parameters without mistakes. Therefore, we will study how to find faulty modules on the contrary, assuming there are errors.
3 CNN-Based Learning
There are several existing deep learning algorithms. Among them, CNN is the most widely known algorithm, designed to use minimal preprocessing (Fig. 3). Compared to other deep learning algorithms, it shows good performance in images and has the advantage of using fewer parameters [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Especially, we decided that it is suitable for the direction that we want in that the feature extraction and learning of images in the image are both possible.
4 Proposed System
Using the advantage of identifying the partial features of CNN, we want to learn the output image to which the value applies in various cases of the parameters used in the simulation. The proposed system is shown in Fig. 4. Images to be learned include those that are not properly homogenized. Classification of images will be possible by characterizing edges and color (energy magnitude) related parts as shown in Fig. 5. At the end of the learning, we use the images obtained from the actual experiment as a training data set and derive the parameters of the matched learned image. Based on this parameter, we can expect the current state of the parameters of the modules used in the actual experiment. 1-layer and 2-layer of neural network for Laser Beam Homogenizer are shown in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively.
5 Conclusion
In experiments involving human beings, the existence of errors is natural. We consider these errors as one piece of information and want to learn human error through CNN. Based on the proposed method, we use simulation images including errors as test data, and try to find error modules by seeding the images obtained through actual experiments. In future work, we will implement this method and provide a guide for the interaction between parameters of the experimental setup and the parameters required by the users.
References
Hwang, S., et al.: Design of square-shaped beam homogenizer for petawatt-class Ti: sapphire amplifier. Opt. Express 25(9), 9511–9520 (2017)
Kim, T., et al.: Numerical analysis of working distance of square-shaped beam homogenizer for laser shock peening. Curr. Opt. Photonics 1(3), 221–227 (2017)
Kim, T., et al.: Analysis of the square beam energy efficiency of a homogenizer near the target for laser shock peening. J. Opt. Soc. Korea 20(3), 407–412 (2016)
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436 (2015)
Schmidhuber, J.: Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw. 61, 85–117 (2015)
Zeiler, M.D., Fergus, R.: Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8689, pp. 818–833. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2012)
Oquab, M., et al.: Learning and transferring mid-level image representations using convolutional neural networks. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR. IEEE (2014)
Provost, F.: Machine learning from imbalanced data sets 101. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2000 Workshop on Imbalanced Data Sets (2000)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Industrial Strategic technology development program, 10048964, Development of 125 J∙Hz laser system for laser peering funded by Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, republic of Korea).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Song, J.H., Shin, H.S., Yu, T.J., Lee, K. (2018). User-Based Error Verification Method of Laser Beam Homogenizer. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2018 – Posters' Extended Abstracts. HCI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92270-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92270-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92269-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92270-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)