Advertisement

Transforming a Neighborhood into a Living Laboratory for Urban Social Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of Urban Living Labs

  • Eun Ji ChoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10912)

Abstract

Cities, where more than half of the world’s population resides nowadays, face a number of challenges that require innovative solutions. This paper pays attention on the emergence of Urban Living Labs that foster urban innovations by bringing various stakeholders, ranging from local governments to citizens, together to co-create innovation. Based on the concept of ‘Living Labs’ - “user-driven innovation environments where users and producers co-create innovation in a trusted, open ecosystem that enables business and societal innovation” (The European Network of Living Labs, 2015) – various types of Urban Living Labs have emerged over the recent years. This paper explores different ways Urban Living Labs operate and contribute to fostering urban social innovation. Three cases of urban living labs - Seoul Innovation Park Living Lab (Seoul, Korea), Living Lab The Neighborhood (Malmö, Sweden), and Living Lab Shanghai (Shanghai, China) – are studied. The three urban living labs are geographically, culturally, and structurally different, but have in common that they aim to foster urban sustainability, with a focus on social innovation. Main actors of each urban living lab, their motivation and roles, representative projects, and (expected) outcomes are examined. Based on the case studies and literature review, this paper highlights the distinctive nature and potential of ‘design-driven’ urban living labs.

Keywords

Urban living labs Urban transformation Design for social innovation Design-driven living labs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted as part of two research projects: “Urban environmental and social innovation design research” project and “Interaction and Service design research” project (DB17010) supported by Shanghai Summit Discipline in Design.

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  2. 2.
    United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eskelinen, J., Robles, A.G., Lindy, I., Marsh, J., Muente-Kunigami, A. (eds.): Citizen Driven Innovation. World Bank Publications, Washington, D.C. (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCormick, K., Hartmann, C. (eds.) The Emerging Landscape of Urban Living Labs: Characteristics, Practices and Examples (2017). http://lup.lub.lu.se/search/ws/files/27224276/Urban_Living_Labs_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2018
  5. 5.
    Steen, K., van Bueren, E.: Urban living labs: a living lab way of working. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS) (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ENoLL. http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/node/1429. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  7. 7.
    Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., Schliwa, G.: Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Product. 123, 45–54 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Living Lab Methodology Handbook. https://www.scribd.com/document/366265932/U4IoT-LivingLabMethodology-Handbook. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  9. 9.
    Seoul Innovation Park. https://www.innovationpark.kr. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  10. 10.
    Youn, C.: The beginning of the era of “Living Labs”. Internal report, Seoul Innovation Park (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medea. http://medea.mah.se. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  12. 12.
    Emilson, A., Hillgren, P.-A., Seravalli, A.: Designing in the neighborhood: beyond (and in the shadow of) creative communities. In: Ehn, P., Nilsson, E. (eds.) Making Futures, Marginal Notes on Innovation Design and Democracy. MIT, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seravalli, A.: Making Commons (Attempts at Composing Prospects in the Opening of Production). Doctoral Dissertation in Interaction Design. School of Arts and Communication. Malmö University, Malmö (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hillgren, P., Seravalli, A., Eriksen, M.A.: Counter-hegemonic practices: dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strat. Des. Res. J. 9(2), 89–99 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hillgren, P.: Participatory design for social and public innovation: living labs as spaces for agonistic experiments and friendly hacking. In: Manzini, E., Staszowski, E. (eds.) Public and Collaborative: Exploring the Intersection of Design, Social Innovation and Public Policy, pp. 75–88. DESIS Network (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hillgren, P.: Living labs as enabling platforms for inclusion and serendipity. In: Nilsson, E.M. (eds.) Prototyping Futures. Malmö university, Malmö (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.A.: Design things and design thinking: contemporary participatory design challenges. Des. Issues 28(3), 101–116 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lerner, J.: Urban Acupuncture. Island Press, Washington, D.C. (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lou, Y., Valsecchi, F., Diaz, C.: Design harvest: an acupunctural design approach toward sustainability. Mistra Urban Futures Publication, Gothenburg, Sweden (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ehn, P., Nilsson, E., Topgaard, R., Watts, L.: Making futures – challenging innovation. In: Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Information Office of Shanghai Municipality. http://en.shio.gov.cn/resource/press/3104.shtml. Accessed 17 Feb 2018
  22. 22.
    GUST Policy Brief: Typology of Urban Living Labs (2017). https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Y5wjmLzF2YajO7Urax6t1HJwXHKNSD9w. Accessed 17 Feb 2018
  23. 23.
    Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Nyström, A.G.: Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2(9), 6–11 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Juujärvi, S., Pesso, K.: Actor roles in an urban living lab: what can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 3(11), 22–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manzini, E.: Design When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kimbell, L.: Designing for service as one way of designing services. Int. J. Des. 5(2), 41–52 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Design and InnovationTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Institute of Design and InnovationTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations