Advertisement

Spatially Differentiated Sustainability Assessment of Products

  • Christian ThiesEmail author
  • Karsten Kieckhäfer
  • Thomas S. Spengler
  • Manbir S. Sodhi
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management book series (SPLCEM)

Abstract

Due to the globalization of supply chains, the environmental and social impacts related to products are often dispersed over many locations. Life cycle-oriented sustainability assessment methods aim at compiling the total impacts without explicitly considering their spatial distribution. This paper illustrates how the incorporation of spatial differentiation in sustainability assessment can influence assessment results and lead to different conclusions about the design of supply chains to improve product sustainability. Comparing two alternative configurations of a simplified supply chain for beer production and concentrating only on environmental impacts, it is found that the consideration of environmental and technological heterogeneity has the potential to reverse the rank order of the alternatives.

Keywords

Sustainability assessment Spatial differentiation Environmental heterogeneity Technological heterogeneity 

References

  1. Finkbeiner, M., Saur, K., Hoffmann, R., Gediga, J., Kreißig, J., Eyerer, P.: The spatial dimension in life cycle assessments. In: Total Life Cycle Conference and Exposition. SAE International (SAE technical paper series), Graz, Austria, 1–3 Dec 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E.M., Lehmann, A., Traverso, M.: Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10), 3309–3322 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., Suh, S.: Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 91(1), 1–21 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hauschild, M., Potting, J.: Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment. The EDIP2003 methodology. Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental News, 80). http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publications/2005/87-7614-579-4/pdf/87-7614-580-8.pdf (2005). Accessed on 6 Sept 2017
  5. Kloepffer, W.: Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13(2), 89–95 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2008.02.376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mutel, C.L., Hellweg, S.: Regionalized life cycle assessment. Computational methodology and application to inventory databases. Environ. Sci. Tech. 43(15), 5797–5803 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1021/es803002jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. O’Rourke, D.: The science of sustainable supply chains. Science 344(6188), 1124–1127 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Patouillard, L., Bulle, C., Querleu, C., Maxime, D., Osset, P., Margni, M.: Critical review and practical recommendations to integrate the spatial dimension into life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 177, 398–412 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Potting, J., Hauschild, M.: Predicted environmental impact and expected occurrence of actual environmental impact. Part II: Spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2(4), 209–216 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02978417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Potting, J., Hauschild, M.: Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment. A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11(S1), 11–13 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., Bras, B.: A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: Impact assessment and interpretation. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13(5), 374–388 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thies, C., Kieckhäfer, K., Spengler, T.S., Sodhi, M.S.: Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.039
  13. Thies, C., Kieckhäfer, K., Spengler, T.S., Sodhi, M.S.: Spatially differentiated sustainability assessment for the design of global supply chains. Proc. CIRP 69, 435–440 (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Verones, F., Hellweg, S., Azevedo, L.B., Chaudhary, A., Cosme, N., Fantke, P., Goedkoop, M., Hauschild, M., Laurent, A., Mutel, C.L., Pfister, S., Ponsioen, T., Steinmann, Z., van Zelm, R., Vieira, M., Huijbregts, M.A.J.: LC-Impact Version 0.5. A spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment approach. http://www.lc-impact.eu/downloads/documents/LC-Impact_report_SEPT2016_20160927.pdf (2016). Accessed on 24 Aug 2017
  15. Yang, Y., Heijungs, R.: A generalized computational structure for regional life-cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22(2), 213–221 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1155-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zamagni, A., Pesonen, H.-L., Swarr, T.: From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18(9), 1637–1641 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0648-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Thies
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karsten Kieckhäfer
    • 1
  • Thomas S. Spengler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Manbir S. Sodhi
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Automotive Management and Industrial Production, Technische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Department of MechanicalIndustrial and Systems Engineering, University of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations