Skip to main content

Thriving in the Anthropocene: Understanding Human-Weed Relations and Invasive Plant Management Using Theories of Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Practices and Dynamic Non-Humans

Abstract

The problem of invasive species is often considered to be a human one, since their present distribution and spread also contributes to an understanding of human influence. But what of the plants themselves? How might we acknowledge that invasive plants do not merely ‘accumulate’, but remake the world differently? In this chapter I draw from posthumanist perspectives of social practice that question the assumption of the stability of organisms. I use examples from ethnographic research in Northern Australia to consider the way plants expose and drive the discontinuities in human regulatory, governance, and other structures designed to limit them. Together, these examples challenge the view of invasive plants as merely extensions of human agency, but they also reveal new avenues for deciding upon futures and priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the term invasive plant is preferred, in some contexts, including for study participants, the term weed is often used interchangeably. The specific weeds examined in the research study are all recognised by weed scientists to be invasive plants.

  2. 2.

    These examples are drawn from research on the social dimensions of invasive plant management in Northern Australia which included participant observation and semi-structured interviews with government scientists, weed officers, land managers, and Indigenous rangers. This project has been reported elsewhere in Atchison and Head (2013), Atchison (2015), Head et al. (2015), and in Atchison and Head (2017).

References

  • Atchison, Jennifer. 2015. Experiments in Co-existence: The Science and Practices of Biocontrol in Invasive Species Management. Environment and Planning A 47 (8): 1697–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atchison, Jennifer, and Lesley Head. 2013. Eradicating Bodies in Invasive Plant Management. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (6): 951–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Rethinking Ethnobotany? A Methodological Reflection on Human-Plant Research. In Participatory Research in More-than-Human Worlds, ed. Michelle Bastian, Owain Jones, Niamh Moore, and Emma Roe, 178–191. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Kezia. 2008. Flexible Boundaries in Biosecurity: Accommodating Gorse in Aotearoa New Zealand. Environment and Planning A 40 (7): 1598–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braam, Janet. 2005. In Touch: Plant Responses to Mechanical Stimuli. New Phytologist 165 (2): 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braje, Todd J., and Jon M. Erlandson. 2013. Human Acceleration of Animal and Plant Extinctions: A Late Pleistocene, Holocene, and Anthropocene Continuum. Anthropocene 4: 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capinha, César, Franz Essl, Hanno Seebens, Dietmar Moser, and Henrique Miguel Pereira. 2015. The Dispersal of Alien Species Redefines Biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348 (6240): 1248–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, Noel. 2014. Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current Contributions. Geography Compass 8 (7): 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, Noel, Catherine Nash, Neil Badmington, Bruce Braun, Jonathon Murdoch, and Sarah Whatmore. 2004. Mapping Posthumanism: An Exchange. Environment and Planning A 36 (8): 1341–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chown, Steven L., Kathryn A. Hodgins, Philippa C. Griffin, John G. Oakeshott, Margaret Byrne, and Ary A. Hoffmann. 2015. Biological Invasions, Climate Change and Genomics. Evolutionary Applications 8 (1): 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Nigel, Vasudha Chhotray, and Roger Few. 2013. Global Justice and Disasters. The Geographical Journal 179 (2): 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Garry D., and Lesley Dias. 2006. It Was No Accident: Deliberate Plant Introductions by Australian Government Agencies During the 20th Century. Australian Journal of Botany 54 (7): 601–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Queensland (DAFF). 2012. Rubber Vine Cryptostegia grandiflora and Cryptostegia madagascariensis. Fact Sheet. https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/52544/IPA-Rubber-Vine-PP11.pdf.

  • Doody, Brendan J., Harvey C. Perkins, Jon J. Sullivan, Colin D. Meurk, and Glenn H. Stewart. 2014. Performing Weeds: Gardening, Plant Agencies and Urban Plant Conservation. Geoforum 56: 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Erle C., Erica C. Antill, and Holga Kreft. 2012. All is Not Loss: Plant Biodiversity in the Anthropocene. PLoS One 7 (1): e30535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha S., and Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2011. Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory. Organization Science 22 (5): 1240–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Anthony C. 2006. The Impacts of Invasive Plant Species on the Biodiversity of Australian Rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 28 (1): 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, Jack R., and Jan M.J. de Wet. 1965. Some Thoughts About Weeds. Economic Botany 19 (1): 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, David R. 1967. New Light on Plant Domestication and the Origins of Agriculture: A Review. Geographical Review 57 (1): 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, Jack G. 2007. The Ecological Background of Plant Domestication. In The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, ed. Peter J. Ucko and Geoffrey W. Dimbleby, 17–29. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, Lesley, Jennifer Atchison, and Catherine Phillips. 2015. The Distinctive Capacities of Plants: Re-thinking Difference Via Invasive Species. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40 (3): 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, Lesley, Jennifer Atchison, Catherine Phillips, and Kathleen Buckingham. 2014. Vegetal Politics: Belonging, Practices and Places. Social and Cultural Geography 15 (8): 861–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Alecia Y. 2013. Posthumanist Data Analysis of Mangling Practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lulka, David. 2009. The Residual Humanism of Hybridity: Retaining a Sense of the Earth. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34 (3): 378–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Richard N. 2003. Global Plant Dispersal, Naturalization, and Invasion: Pathways, Modes, and Circumstances. In Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies, ed. Gregory Ruiz and James T. Carlton, 3–30. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, Michael L., and Julie L. Lockwood. 1999. Biotic Homogenization: A Few Winners Replacing Many Losers in the Next Mass Extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14 (11): 450–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, Jeffrey A. 2001. The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. Cambridge, UK: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panelli, Ruth. 2010. More-than-human Social Geographies: Posthuman and Other Possibilities. Progress in Human Geography 34 (1): 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Catherine. 2016. Saving More Than Seeds: Practices and Politics of Seed Saving. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew. 1993. The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science. American Journal of Sociology 99: 559–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Mangle of Practice. Time, Agency and Science. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Asian Eels and Global Warming: A Posthumanist Perspective on Society and the Environment. Ethics & The Environment 10 (2): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, Petr, and David M. Richardson. 2010. Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35: 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, Anthony. 2007. Are Modern Biological Invasions an Unprecedented form of Global Change? Conservation Biology 21 (2): 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinkinen, Jenny. 2018. Seeing Wood for the Trees: Placing Biological Processes Within Practices of Heating and Harvesting. In Social Practices and Dynamic Non-humans: Nature, Materials and Technologies, ed. Cecily Maller and Yolande Strengers, 47–62. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, Natalie A., Samantha A. Setterfield, Michael M. Douglas, and Lindsay B. Hutley. 2003. Testing the Grass-Fire Cycle: Alien Grass Invasion in the Tropical Savannas of Northern Australia. Diversity and Distributions 9 (3): 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Carl O. 1947. Early Relations of Man to Plants. Geographical Review 37 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, Theodore. 2001. Introduction: Practice Theory. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore Schatzki, Karin K. Cetina, and Eike V. Savigny, 10–23. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Introduction. Human Affairs 17: 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, Daniel. 2013. Commentary: Biological Invasions: Prospects for Slowing a Major Global Change. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene 1: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Chris D. 2013. The Anthropocene Could Raise Biological Diversity. Nature 502 (7469): 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen, Mark, Wayne Dawson, Franz Essl, Jan Pergl, Marten Winter, Ewald Weber, Holger Kreft, et al. 2015. Global Exchange and Accumulation of Non-native Plants. Nature 525: 100–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Charles R. 2007. Perspectives on the Alien ‘Versus Native’ Species Debate: A Critique of Concepts, Language and Practice. Progress in Human Geography 31 (4): 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, Sarah. 2006. Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography in and for a More-than-Human World. Cultural Geographies 13 (4): 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was funded by an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship to Professor Lesley Head (FL0992397). I thank Lesley and Dr Catherine Phillips for always productive conversations about plants, Stephanie Toole for assistance in the field, and colleagues at AUSCCER for engaging discussions on theories of practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Atchison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Atchison, J. (2019). Thriving in the Anthropocene: Understanding Human-Weed Relations and Invasive Plant Management Using Theories of Practice. In: Maller, C., Strengers, Y. (eds) Social Practices and Dynamic Non-Humans. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92189-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92189-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92188-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92189-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics