Skip to main content

Participatory Health Research with Older People in the Netherlands: Navigating Power Imbalances Towards Mutually Transforming Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Participatory Health Research

Abstract

Recently, policymakers intend to transform the welfare state to a ‘participation society’ in the Netherlands. This neo-liberal orientation is legitimized by the notion of ‘self-sufficiency’. Against this backdrop we sketch participatory health research (PHR) and its history, followed by the description of our own approach to PHR and principles of PHR encompassing three steps: (1) collecting experiences of the those whose life (or work) is the subject of the study as a starting point for mutual learning, (2) ongoing dialogue with different stakeholders which is strength-based and extending their horizons, and (3) collaborative action and monitoring outcomes. We focus on older people and historical/cultural differences between different generations which have implications for PHR and for addressing specific groups of older people. We present two examples: one concerning a group of older people in a residential setting and the other concerning a group of baby boomers in a WHO Age-Friendly City project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abma, T. A. (1998). Storytelling as inquiry in a mental hospital. Qualitative Health Research, 8(6), 821–838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A. (2003). Learning by telling storytelling workshops as an organizational learning intervention. Management Learning, 34(2), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A. (2005a). Responsive evaluation in health promotion: Its value for ambiguous contexts. Health Promotion International, 20(4), 391–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A. (2005b). Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1310–1328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A., & Broerse, J. E. (2010). Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas. Health Expectations, 13(2), 160–173.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A., & Stake, R. E. (2001). Stake’s responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution. New Directions for Evaluation, 2001(92), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2005). Sharing stories narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(1), 90–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2006). Responsieve methodologie: Interactief onderzoek in de praktijk. Amsterdam: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. A., Greene, J. C., Karlsson, O., et al. (2001). Dialogue on dialogue. Evaluation, 7(2), 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, V. E. (2012). Participation & partnership: Developing the influence of older people in residential care homes. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, V., & Abma, T. (2012). ‘The Taste Buddies’: Participation and empowerment in a residential home for older people. Ageing and Society, 32(06), 1055–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, V. E., Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2010). Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: Mission impossible? Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 238–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, V. E., Abma, T. A., Boelsma, F., & Woelders, S. (2013). Pioneering partnerships: Resident involvement from multiple perspectives. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(4), 358–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. A. (1992). Generaties en hun kansen. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindels, J., Baur, V., Cox, K., et al. (2014). Older people as co-researchers: A collaborative journey. Ageing and Society, 34(06), 951–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boog, B. (2007). Handelingsonderzoek of action research. KWALON. Tijdschrift voor Kwalitatief Onderzoek, 12(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, G. F. (2016). Antwoorden op andersheid: Over ontmoetingen tussen mensen met en zonder verstandelijke beperking in omgekeerde-integratiesettingen. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron-Flinterman, J. F. (2005). A new voice in science: Patient participation in decision-making on biomedical research. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1(1), 129–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D., Whitney, D. D., & Stavros, J. M. (2008). The appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedding, C. (2009). Delen in mahct en onmacht, Kinderparticipatie in de (alledaagse) diabeteszorg. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diepstraten, I., Ester, P., & Vinken, H. (1999). Talkin’bout my generation. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 35(2), 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elberse, J. E. (2012). Changing the health research system. Patient participation in health research. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). National reform programme 2014 the Netherlands. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016). Stability programme of the Netherlands. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortuyn, P. (1998). Babyboomers Autobiografie van een generatie. Houten: Bruna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2013). Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom? Synthese 190(7), 1317–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2016). Playing with purpose: Adventures in performative social science. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groot, B. C. & Abma, T. A. (2018) Partnership, collaboration and power. In S. Banks & M. Brydon-Miller (2018) Ethics in participatory research for health and social well-being. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootegoed, E. M. (2013). Dignity of dependence: welfare state reform and the struggle for respect. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1987) The countenances of fourth-generation evaluation: Description, judgment, and negotiation. In The politics of program evaluation (pp. 202–234) 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, D. (2009). Gerontology: Adding an empowerment paradigm. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(3), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2007). The next 20 years. Harvard Business Review, 85, 41–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2013a). Position paper 1: What is participatory health research? Version: May 2013. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2013b). Position paper 2: Participatory health research: A guide to ethical principals and practice, Version: October 2013. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. C. (2001). De paradox van kracht en kwetsbaarheid. Empowerment in feministische hulpverlening en humanistisch raadswerk. Doctoral dissertation, University of Humanistic.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lieshout, F.. (2013). Taking action for action: A study of the interplay between contextual and facilitator characteristics in developing an effective workplace culture in a Dutch hospital setting, through action research. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ulster.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lieshout, F., & Cardiff, S. (2011). Innovative ways of analysing data with practitioners as co-researchers. In D. Bridges, D. Horsfall, Higgs, et al. (Eds.)., (2011) Creative spaces for qualitative researching (pp. 223–234). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maarse, J. H., & Jeurissen, P. P. (2016). The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands. Health Policy, 120(3), 241–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nierse, C. J., & Abma, T. A. (2011). Developing voice and empowerment: The first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(4), 411–421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oguz, N. B., Gulru, Z. G., & Erme, K. (2015). Symbiosis of action research and deliberative democracy in the context of participatory constitution making. In Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. R. (1998). Organizational transformation as a function of CEO's developmental stage. Organization Development Journal, 16(1), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. R. (2005). Seven transformations of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83(4), 66–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, K. (2012). Patient participation & knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeren, M. (2015). Working= learning. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1975). To evaluate an arts program. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach (pp. 13–31). Columbus: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen, G.J. (2014). Values and criteria of people with a chronic illness or disability: Strengthening the voice of their representatives in the health debate and the decision making process. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, W. R. (2003). Personal and organisational transformations through action inquiry. London: The Cromwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, W. R. (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, W. R., & Taylor, S. S. (2008). Action inquiry: Interweaving multiple qualities of attention for timely action. In Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Second edition. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, W. R. (2013). Listening into the dark: An essay testing the validity and efficacy of collaborative developmental action inquiry for describing and encouraging transformations of self, society, and scientific inquiry. Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, & Praxis, 9(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Donk, C., & Van Lanen, B. (2012). Praktijkonderzoek in de school. Bussum: Coutinho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Plaat, M. (1999). Locating the feminist scholar: Relational empowerment and social activism. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 773–785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weerman, A. (2016). Ervaringsdeskundige zorg- en dienstverleners: Stigma, verslaving & existentiële transformatie. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdershoven, G. A. (2001). Dialogue in evaluation: A hermeneutic perspective. Evaluation, 7(2), 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., et al. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, M. P. T. (2014). Patient participation in rheumatology research: A four level responsive evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, M., Abma, T. A., & Koelewijn-van Loon, M. (2013). Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: A responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ Open, 3(5), e002241.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all co-researchers and other stakeholders who participated in the initiatives. We would also like to thank our co-facilitators and colleagues Vivianne Baur, Elena Bendien and Maaike Muntinga.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara C. Groot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Groot, B.C., Abma, T.A. (2018). Participatory Health Research with Older People in the Netherlands: Navigating Power Imbalances Towards Mutually Transforming Power. In: Wright, M., Kongats, K. (eds) Participatory Health Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92176-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92177-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics