Abstract
Recently, policymakers intend to transform the welfare state to a ‘participation society’ in the Netherlands. This neo-liberal orientation is legitimized by the notion of ‘self-sufficiency’. Against this backdrop we sketch participatory health research (PHR) and its history, followed by the description of our own approach to PHR and principles of PHR encompassing three steps: (1) collecting experiences of the those whose life (or work) is the subject of the study as a starting point for mutual learning, (2) ongoing dialogue with different stakeholders which is strength-based and extending their horizons, and (3) collaborative action and monitoring outcomes. We focus on older people and historical/cultural differences between different generations which have implications for PHR and for addressing specific groups of older people. We present two examples: one concerning a group of older people in a residential setting and the other concerning a group of baby boomers in a WHO Age-Friendly City project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abma, T. A. (1998). Storytelling as inquiry in a mental hospital. Qualitative Health Research, 8(6), 821–838.
Abma, T. A. (2003). Learning by telling storytelling workshops as an organizational learning intervention. Management Learning, 34(2), 221–240.
Abma, T. A. (2005a). Responsive evaluation in health promotion: Its value for ambiguous contexts. Health Promotion International, 20(4), 391–397.
Abma, T. A. (2005b). Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1310–1328.
Abma, T. A., & Broerse, J. E. (2010). Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas. Health Expectations, 13(2), 160–173.
Abma, T. A., & Stake, R. E. (2001). Stake’s responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution. New Directions for Evaluation, 2001(92), 7–22.
Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2005). Sharing stories narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(1), 90–109.
Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2006). Responsieve methodologie: Interactief onderzoek in de praktijk. Amsterdam: Lemma.
Abma, T. A., Greene, J. C., Karlsson, O., et al. (2001). Dialogue on dialogue. Evaluation, 7(2), 164–180.
Baur, V. E. (2012). Participation & partnership: Developing the influence of older people in residential care homes. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Baur, V., & Abma, T. (2012). ‘The Taste Buddies’: Participation and empowerment in a residential home for older people. Ageing and Society, 32(06), 1055–1078.
Baur, V. E., Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2010). Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: Mission impossible? Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 238–245.
Baur, V. E., Abma, T. A., Boelsma, F., & Woelders, S. (2013). Pioneering partnerships: Resident involvement from multiple perspectives. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(4), 358–367.
Becker, H. A. (1992). Generaties en hun kansen. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
Bindels, J., Baur, V., Cox, K., et al. (2014). Older people as co-researchers: A collaborative journey. Ageing and Society, 34(06), 951–973.
Boog, B. (2007). Handelingsonderzoek of action research. KWALON. Tijdschrift voor Kwalitatief Onderzoek, 12(1), 13–20.
Bos, G. F. (2016). Antwoorden op andersheid: Over ontmoetingen tussen mensen met en zonder verstandelijke beperking in omgekeerde-integratiesettingen. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Caron-Flinterman, J. F. (2005). A new voice in science: Patient participation in decision-making on biomedical research. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1(1), 129–169.
Cooperrider, D., Whitney, D. D., & Stavros, J. M. (2008). The appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Dedding, C. (2009). Delen in mahct en onmacht, Kinderparticipatie in de (alledaagse) diabeteszorg. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Diepstraten, I., Ester, P., & Vinken, H. (1999). Talkin’bout my generation. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 35(2), 91–109.
Elberse, J. E. (2012). Changing the health research system. Patient participation in health research. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
European Commission. (2014). National reform programme 2014 the Netherlands. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2016). Stability programme of the Netherlands. Brussels: European Commission.
Fortuyn, P. (1998). Babyboomers Autobiografie van een generatie. Houten: Bruna.
Fricker, M. (2013). Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom? Synthese 190(7), 1317–1332.
Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2016). Playing with purpose: Adventures in performative social science. Abingdon: Routledge.
Groot, B. C. & Abma, T. A. (2018) Partnership, collaboration and power. In S. Banks & M. Brydon-Miller (2018) Ethics in participatory research for health and social well-being. Abingdon: Routledge.
Grootegoed, E. M. (2013). Dignity of dependence: welfare state reform and the struggle for respect. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1987) The countenances of fourth-generation evaluation: Description, judgment, and negotiation. In The politics of program evaluation (pp. 202–234) 15
Haber, D. (2009). Gerontology: Adding an empowerment paradigm. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(3), 283–297.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2007). The next 20 years. Harvard Business Review, 85, 41–52.
International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2013a). Position paper 1: What is participatory health research? Version: May 2013. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research.
International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2013b). Position paper 2: Participatory health research: A guide to ethical principals and practice, Version: October 2013. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research.
Jacobs, G. C. (2001). De paradox van kracht en kwetsbaarheid. Empowerment in feministische hulpverlening en humanistisch raadswerk. Doctoral dissertation, University of Humanistic.
van Lieshout, F.. (2013). Taking action for action: A study of the interplay between contextual and facilitator characteristics in developing an effective workplace culture in a Dutch hospital setting, through action research. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ulster.
van Lieshout, F., & Cardiff, S. (2011). Innovative ways of analysing data with practitioners as co-researchers. In D. Bridges, D. Horsfall, Higgs, et al. (Eds.)., (2011) Creative spaces for qualitative researching (pp. 223–234). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.
Maarse, J. H., & Jeurissen, P. P. (2016). The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands. Health Policy, 120(3), 241–245.
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nierse, C. J., & Abma, T. A. (2011). Developing voice and empowerment: The first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(4), 411–421.
Oguz, N. B., Gulru, Z. G., & Erme, K. (2015). Symbiosis of action research and deliberative democracy in the context of participatory constitution making. In Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. R. (1998). Organizational transformation as a function of CEO's developmental stage. Organization Development Journal, 16(1), 11.
Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. R. (2005). Seven transformations of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83(4), 66–76.
Schipper, K. (2012). Patient participation & knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Snoeren, M. (2015). Working= learning. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Stake, R. E. (1975). To evaluate an arts program. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach (pp. 13–31). Columbus: Merrill.
Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Teunissen, G.J. (2014). Values and criteria of people with a chronic illness or disability: Strengthening the voice of their representatives in the health debate and the decision making process. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Torbert, W. R. (2003). Personal and organisational transformations through action inquiry. London: The Cromwell Press.
Torbert, W. R. (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Torbert, W. R., & Taylor, S. S. (2008). Action inquiry: Interweaving multiple qualities of attention for timely action. In Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Second edition. Sage: London.
Torbert, W. R. (2013). Listening into the dark: An essay testing the validity and efficacy of collaborative developmental action inquiry for describing and encouraging transformations of self, society, and scientific inquiry. Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, & Praxis, 9(2).
Van der Donk, C., & Van Lanen, B. (2012). Praktijkonderzoek in de school. Bussum: Coutinho.
Vander Plaat, M. (1999). Locating the feminist scholar: Relational empowerment and social activism. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 773–785.
Weerman, A. (2016). Ervaringsdeskundige zorg- en dienstverleners: Stigma, verslaving & existentiële transformatie. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
Widdershoven, G. A. (2001). Dialogue in evaluation: A hermeneutic perspective. Evaluation, 7(2), 253–263.
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., et al. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366.
de Wit, M. P. T. (2014). Patient participation in rheumatology research: A four level responsive evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, Free University.
de Wit, M., Abma, T. A., & Koelewijn-van Loon, M. (2013). Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: A responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ Open, 3(5), e002241.
World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Acknowledgements
We thank all co-researchers and other stakeholders who participated in the initiatives. We would also like to thank our co-facilitators and colleagues Vivianne Baur, Elena Bendien and Maaike Muntinga.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Groot, B.C., Abma, T.A. (2018). Participatory Health Research with Older People in the Netherlands: Navigating Power Imbalances Towards Mutually Transforming Power. In: Wright, M., Kongats, K. (eds) Participatory Health Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92176-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92177-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)