Advertisement

Communal Narcissism: Theoretical and Empirical Support

  • Jochen E. GebauerEmail author
  • Constantine Sedikides
Chapter

Abstract

Grandiose narcissists’ global self-evaluations are characterized by exceptional self-importance, entitlement, and social power. But what are the specific content domains in which grandiose narcissists evaluate themselves so highly that they can subjectively justify their narcissistic self-evaluations at the global level? The classic view is that grandiose narcissists base their global self-evaluations on excessive self-enhancement in the agentic domain (e.g., extremely inflated self-views concerning intelligence, creativity, and scholastic aptitude), but not on excessive self-enhancement in the communal domain (e.g., no extremely inflated self-views concerning morality, prosociality, and interpersonal aptitude). We maintain that this classic view only captures one form of grandiose narcissism—agentic narcissism—at the expense of a complementary form: communal narcissism. Like agentic (i.e., classic) narcissists, communal narcissists hold global self-evaluations of exceptional self-importance, entitlement, and social power. Unlike agentic narcissists, however, communal narcissists base those global self-evaluations on excessive self-enhancement in the communal domain, not on excessive self-enhancement in the agentic domain. We review the theoretical and empirical support for communal narcissism’s existence. We conclude that communal narcissism is real and that a full understanding of grandiose narcissism necessitates attention to both classic/agentic and communal narcissism.

Keywords

Communal narcissism Grandiose narcissism Self-concept content Agency Communion Agency-communion model of narcissism 

References

  1. Barry, C. T., & Malkin, M. L. (2010). The relation between adolescent narcissism and internalizing problems depends on the conceptualization of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 684–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). The self-esteem scale. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 115–160). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cain, N. M., Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 638–656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, W. K. (2001). Is narcissism really so bad? Psychological Inquiry, 12, 214–216.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a new self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), The self (pp. 115–138). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.  https://doi.org/10.1037//10403590.7.3.309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Worthington Jr., E. L., Van Tongeren, D. R., Gartner, A. L., Jennings, D. J., et al. (2011). Relational humility: Conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.558871 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 188–207.  https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fatfouta, R., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2017). I’m merciful, am I not? Facets of narcissism and forgiveness revisited. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 166–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finkel, E. J., Campbell, W. K., Buffardi, L. E., Kumashiro, M., Rusbult, C. E. (2009). The metamorphosis of Narcissus: Communal activation promotes relationship commitment among narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1271–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209340904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gebauer, J. E., Paulhus, D. L., & Neberich, W. (2013). Big two personality and religiosity across cultures: Communals as religious conformists and agentics as religious contrarians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612442553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C. (in press). Agency and communion in grandiose narcissism. In A. E. Abele & B. Wojciszke (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029629 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gebauer, J. E. et al. (2018). Grandiose narcissism comprises agentic and communal narcissism: Theoretical and empirical review and implications for narcissism theory. Manuscript in preparation, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  17. Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2014). Down-regulating narcissistic tendencies: Communal focus reduces state narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 488–500.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213516635 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2015). Validating power makes communal narcissists less communal. Self and Identity, 14, 583–601.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1031820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grijalva, E., & Zhang, L. (2016). Narcissism and self-insight: A review and meta-analysis of narcissists’ self-enhancement tendencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215611636 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, P. C., & Laney, E. K. (2017). Beyond self-interest: Humility and the quieted self. In K. W. Brown & M. R. Leary (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypo-egoic phenomena (pp. 243–255). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. (2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 3–31.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  23. Luo, Y. L., Cai, H., Sedikides, C., & Song, H. (2014). Distinguishing communal narcissism from agentic narcissism: A behavior genetics analysis on the agency–communion model of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 52–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, J. D., Price, J., Gentile, B., Lynam, D. R., & Campbell, W. K. (2012). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism from the perspective of the interpersonal circumplex. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 507–512.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nehrlich, A. D., Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Schoel, C. (in press). Agentic narcissism, communal narcissism, and prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000190
  27. Paulhus, D. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist views. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 228–230.Google Scholar
  28. Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Paulhus, D. L., John, O. P. (1994, August). How many dimensions of evaluation are there? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic bias in self-perceptions: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the pathological narcissism inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365–379.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016530 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberts, C. R., & Wood, W. J. (2003). Humility and epistemic goods. In M. De Paul & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623–642.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sedikides, C., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Narcissistic force meets systemic resistance: The energy clash model. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 400–421.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617692105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sedikides, C., Rudich, E. A., Gregg, A. P., Kumashiro, M., & Rusbult, C. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy? Self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 400–416.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.400 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tafarodi, R. W., & Milne, A. B. (2002). Decomposing global self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 70, 443–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomaes, S., Brummelman, E., Sedikides, C. (2018). Narcissism: A social-developmental perspective. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Applications of personality and individual differences (pp. 377–396). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 590–597.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang, Z., Sedikides, C., Gu, R., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Cai, H. (2018). Communal narcissism: Social decisions and neurophysiological reactions. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  43. Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Clinton, A., & Piotrowski, J. (2014). Agentic and communal narcissism and subjective Well-being: Are narcissistic individuals unhappy? A research report. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2, 10–16.  https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2014.43097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Czarna, A. Z., Piotrowski, J., Baran, T., & Maltby, J. (2016). Structural validity of the communal narcissism inventory (CNI): The bifactor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 315–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J., & Maltby, J. (2015). Agentic and communal narcissism and satisfaction with life: The mediating role of psychological entitlement and self-esteem. International Journal of Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mannheim Centre for European Social ResearchUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations