Narcissism and Memory

  • Lara L. JonesEmail author


Grandiose narcissism (characterized by an inflated sense of self) uniquely influences the encoding and retrieval of information important to one’s identity including evaluative feedback, self-related traits, and life events. Depending on both the valence (positive or negative) and the agency (self- vs. other-focused) of the information or events, narcissists’ memories may be more vivid, suppressed, or distorted. This chapter summarizes prior research on narcissism and memory as well as more recent studies focusing on the role of attention biases in the encoding of self-related traits and memories. Overall, studies support the agency model of narcissism’s prediction of attention biases and memorial enhancement for positive-agentic (e.g., clever, talented) rather than positive-communal (e.g., cooperative, sympathetic) events or information. However, results are mixed for the attention to and encoding of negative-agentic traits/events (e.g., shameful, stupid) and may depend on the extent to which the information is ego-threatening as well as the subtype of narcissism (vulnerable or grandiose).


Agency model of narcissism Autobiographical memory Self-reference effect Mnemic neglect Attentional biases 


  1. Besser, A., Zeigler-Hill, V., Weinberg, M., & Pincus, A. L. (2016). Do great expectations lead to great disappointments? Pathological narcissism and the evaluation of vacation experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds.), Frontiers in social psychology: The self (pp. 115–138). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In E. J. Finkel & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 57–83). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Djikic M., Chan I., & Peterson J. B. (2007). Reducing memory distortions in egoistic self-enhancers: Effects of indirect social facilitation. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4):723–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Djikic M., Peterson J. B., Zelazo P. D., (2005) Attentional biases and memory distortions in self-enhancers. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(3):559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitzgerald, J., & Broadbridge, C. L. (2013). Latent constructs of the autobiographical memory questionnaire: A recollection-belief model of autobiographical experience. Memory, 21, 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foster, J. D., & Brennan, J. C. (2011). Narcissism, the agency model, and approach-avoidance motivation. In W. K. Campbell & J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatment (pp. 89–100). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Foster, J. D., & Trimm, R. F. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited: Narcissism and approach-avoidance motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1004–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gosling, S. D., John, O. P., Craik, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (1998). Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1337–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, J. D., & Sedikides, C. (2004). Retrieval selectivity in the processing of self-referent information: Testing the boundaries of self-protection. Self and Identity, 3, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gu, Y., He, N., & Zhao, G. (2013). Attentional bias for performance-related words in individuals with narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 671–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart, C. M., Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., Routledge, C., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2011). Nostalgic recollections of high and low narcissists. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hepper, E. G., Hart, C. M., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2011). Motivated expectations of positive feedback in social interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horvath, S., & Morf, C. C. (2009). Narcissistic defensiveness: Hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1252–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, L. L., & Brunell, A. B. (2014). Clever and crude but not kind: Narcissism, self-esteem, and the self-reference effect. Memory, 22, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, L. L., Norville, G. L., & Wright, A. M. (2017). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the phenomenology of autobiographical memories. Memory, 25, 800–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krusemark, E. A., Lee, C., & Newman, J. P. (2015). Narcissism dimensions differentially moderate selective attention to evaluative stimuli in incarcerated offenders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maestripieri, D., Henry, A., & Nickels, N. (2017). Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchlewska, M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). An autobiographical gateway: Narcissists avoid first-person visual perspective while retrieving self-threatening memories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raskin, R. N., & Terry, H. (1988). A principle components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rhodewalt, F., & Eddings, S. K. (2002). Narcissus reflects: Memory distortion in response to ego-relevant feedback among high- and low narcissistic men. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ritchie, T. D., Walker, W. R., Marsh, S., Hart, C., & Skowronski, J. J. (2015). Narcissism distorts the fading effect bias in autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2000). On the self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: Using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 906–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2004). What I don’t recall can’t hurt me: Information negativity versus information inconsistency as determinants of memorial self-defense. Social Cognition, 22, 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2009). Memory as a self-protective mechanism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1055–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stucke, T. S. (2003). Who’s to blame? Narcissism and self-serving attributions following feedback. European Journal of Personality, 17, 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sutin, A. R., & Robins, R. W. (2005). Continuity and correlates of emotions and motives in self-defining memories. Journal of Personality, 73, 793–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations