Abstract
In this chapter, it is argued that corporate communication is not an arbitrary affair, but an activity with its own intrinsic normativity. Communication is part of a creation order, which means that one has to obey specific norms and rules in order to present oneself in a convincing way. First of all, organisations need to have a clear sense of self and have to be accountable for their actions. They must know “who” they are, and to which principles they adhere (directional dimension). Second, organisations must have a clear sense of the intrinsic good that is at stake in their professional field. They need to have a clear understanding of “what” they are doing (structural dimension). Third, organisations must have a clear understanding of what is required in their specific context. They must have a sense of “why” they exist in a particular time and place (contextual dimension). All three normative dimensions are important. If they lose sight of any one of these dimensions, organizations risk losing their credibility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Here I make use of a distinction made by Ricoeur (1992, 2–3; 115–125) between idem identity and ipse identity.
References
Aula, P., and S. Mantere. 2008. Strategic reputation management. Towards a company of the good. New York: Routledge.
Avenarius, H. 2008. Public Relations. Die Grundform der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Balmer, J.M.T., and S.A. Greyser. 2003. Managing the multiple identities of the corporation. In Revealing the cooperation. Perspectives on identity, image, reputation, corporate branding and corporate-level marketing, ed. J.M.T. Balmer and S.A. Greyser, 15–29. New York: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Campbell, H., and A.C. La Pastina. 2010. How the iPhone became divine. New media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning. New Media & Society 12 (7): 1191–1207.
Chambers, S. 1996. Reasonable democracy. Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. New York: Cornell University Press.
Collins, J., and J.I. Porras. 2005. Built to last. Successful habits of visionary companies. 10th Anniversary ed. London: Random House Business Books.
Edwards, L., and E.M. Hodges. 2011. Public relations, society and culture. Theoretical and empirical explorations. London: Routledge.
Ferry, L. 2002. Man made god. The meaning of life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Grunig, J.E., L.A. Grunig, and D.M. Dozier. 2006. The excellence theory. In Public relations theory II, ed. C.H. Botan and V. Hazleton, 21–62. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Habermas, J. 1983. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
———. 1996. Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hauerwas, S. 2001. A story-formed community. Reflections on watership down. In The Hauerwas reader, ed. S. Hauerwas, 171–199. Durham: Duke University Press.
Heelas, P., and L. Woodhead. 2005. The spiritual revolution. Why religion is giving way to spirituality. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Jochemsen, H. 2006. Normative practices as an intermediate between theoretical ethics and morality. Philosophia Reformata 71 (1): 96–112.
Kotler, P., H. Kartajaya, and I. Setiawan. 2010. Marketing 3.0. From products to customers to the human spirit. Hoboken: Wiley.
MacIntyre, A. 1985. After virtue. A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.
Mouw, R.J., and S. Griffioen. 1993. Pluralisms and horizons. An essay in christian public philosophy. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Ricoeur, P. 1992. Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schofield Clark, L. 2007. Religion, media, and the marketplace. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.
Sinek, S. 2009. Start with why. Why great leaders inspire everyone to take action. New York: Penguin.
Stolow, J. 2005. Religion and/as media. Theory, Culture & Society 22 (4): 119–145.
Taylor, C. 1991. The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1994. The politics of recognition. In Multiculturalism. Examining the politics of recognition, ed. A. Gutmann, 25–73. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Van Riel, C.B.M., and C. Fombrun. 2007. Essentials of corporate communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
Van Ruler, B., and D. Verĉiĉ. 2005. Reflective communication management, future ways for public relations research. In Communication yearbook 29, ed. P.J. Kalbfleish, 239–274. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Walzer, M. 1987. Interpretation and social criticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weick, K.E. 2001. Making sense of the organization. Malden: Blackwell.
Žižek, S. 2009. First as tragedy, then as farce. London: Verso.
———. 2010. Living in the end times. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Stoep, J. (2018). Normative Dimensions of Corporate Communication. In: Buijs, G., Mosher, A. (eds) The Future of Creation Order. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92147-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92147-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92146-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92147-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)