Advertisement

The Intended, Implemented, and Achieved Curriculum of Mathematics Teacher Education in the United States

  • Maria Teresa TattoEmail author
  • Kiril Bankov
Chapter

Abstract

The first part of this chapter describes the development of a systematic model for the comparative study of the curriculum of teacher education programs used in the Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). We use the United States as a case study to describe in depth the intended, implemented, and achieved curriculum of teacher education. We present in detail the results of the curriculum analysis for programs preparing future primary and secondary teachers (or the intended curriculum). We contrast these results with the number of clock hours dedicated to different areas of teacher education, and with future teachers’ perception of their opportunities to learn (as indicators of the implemented curriculum), and with future teachers’ knowledge at graduation (as indicators of the achieved curriculum).

We discuss the implications of our findings for the study of the teacher education curriculum in an era of increased accountability.

References

  1. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Retrieved from http://amte.net/standards
  2. Blömeke, S. (2012). Content, professional preparation, and teaching methods: How diverse is teacher education across countries? Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 684–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Hammerness, K. M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., McDonald, M., … Wyckoff, J. (2008). Surveying the landscape of teacher education in New York City: Constrained variation and the challenge of innovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd, D., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchmann, M., & Schmidt, W. (1981). The school day and content commitments. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. (1963). A model for school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Constantine, J., Player D., Silva, T., Hallgren, K., Grider, M., & Deke, J. (2009). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification, final report (NCEE 2009-4043). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1–48.Google Scholar
  10. Garden, R., Lie, S., Robitaille, D. F., Angell, C., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., … Arora, A. (2006). TIMSS Advanced 2008 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  11. Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1994a). Considerations of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (pp. 179–221). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  12. Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S. (1994b). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Husen, T. (Ed.). (1967a). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Husen, T. (Ed.). (1967b). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vol. II). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy, M. (2015). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Gitomer, D., Turrou, C., Beasley, H., … Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.Google Scholar
  19. McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McKnight, C. C., Crosswhite, F. J., Dossey, J. A., Kifer, E., Swafford, J. O., Travers, K. J., et al. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing US school mathematics from an international perspective. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2007). TIMSS 2007 Assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  22. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Tatto, M. T. (2000). Assessing what we know about teacher quality and development: Empirical indicators and methodological issues in comparative perspective. Report commissioned by the Board on Comparative and International Studies in Education (BICSE) National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Tatto, M. T. (Ed.). (2013). The teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: Technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement.Google Scholar
  25. Tatto, M. T., & Hordern, J. (2017). The configuration of teacher education as a professional field of practice: a comparative study of mathematics education. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration, Oxford Comparative Education Series (pp. 255–274). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  26. Tatto, M. T., Nielsen, H. D., Cummings, W. C., Kularatna, N. G., & Dharmadasa, D. H. (1991). Comparing the effects and costs of different approaches for educating primary school teachers: The case of Sri Lanka, BRIDGES Research Report Series (Vol. 10). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.Google Scholar
  27. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, Michigan State University, and IEA.Google Scholar
  28. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., … Reckase, M. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement.Google Scholar
  29. Tatto, M. T., & Senk, S. (2011). The mathematics education of future primary and secondary teachers: Methods and findings from the teacher education and development study in mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). The condition of education 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97388.pdfGoogle Scholar
  31. Valverde, G., Bianchi, L., Wolfe, R., Schmidt, W., & Houang, R. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of text-books. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tatto. M.T. (ed.) (2013). The Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Technical Report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mary Lou Fulton Teachers CollegeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.University of SofiaSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations