Skip to main content

Action Research and Participatory Decision-Aid Models in Rural Development: The Experience of “Terre Locridee” Local Action Group in Southern Italy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (ISHT 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 101))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The increasing involvement of local stakeholders in planning processes implies the decentralization of decisional power through participatory activities which make it possible to define development strategies that take into account a wide variety of perspectives. This paper, in the context of Action Research, focuses on the planning process of a Local Action Plan (LAP) within the Leader Axis that involves stakeholders from 36 municipalities belonging to the “Locride” area, in Southern Italy. At the basis of the LAP is the principle of consultation and cooperation between public and private actors, in order to identify common paths of development, thus activating the latent potential of the territories and leveraging the real knowledge of local actors on the issues of the areas designated for intervention. In such a context, a decision-aid model based on a multicriteria method and a convergence process was used in order to control the escalation of conflicts that arose among different stakeholders in the identification of shared thematic areas to be included in the LAP. The results show that the conflicts were effectively managed, and that the main drivers commonly chosen for the development of the territory combine interventions related to the fields of agro- food and artisan products, the social context, and the historical and environmental landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trencher, G.P., Yarime, M., Kharrazi, A.: Co-creating sustainability: cross-sector university collaborations for driving sustainable urban transformations. J. Clean. Prod. 50, 40–55 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trencher, G.P., et al.: University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 153–165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Trencher, G.P., et al.: Implementing sustainability co-creation between universities and society: a typology-based understanding. Sustainability 9(594), 1–28 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rinaldi, C., Cavicchi, A.: Universities’ emerging roles to co-create sustainable innovation paths: some evidences from the Marche Region. Aestimum 69, 221–224 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Romeo, G., Marcianò, C.: Performance evaluation of rural governance using an integrated AHP-VIKOR methodology. In: Zopounidis, C., Kalogeras, N., Mattas, K., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G. (eds.) Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy, pp. 109–134. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Romeo, G., Marcianò, C.: Governance assessment of the leader approach in Calabria using an integrated AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Adv. Eng. Forum 11, 566–572 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marcianò, C., Romeo, G., Cozzupoli, F.: An integrated methodological framework for the definition of local development strategies for fisheries local action groups: an application to the stretto coast FLAG in South Italy. In: Proceedings of the XXII Conference of the European Association of Fisheries Economist, Salerno, Italy (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Budzich-Tabor, U.: Area-based local development - a new opportunity for European fisheries areas. In: Urquhart, J., Acott, T., Symes, D., Zhao, M. (eds.) Social Issues in Sustainable Fisheries Management. MARE Publication, Series 9, pp. 183–197. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tola, A.: Strategie, metodi e strumenti per lo sviluppo dei territori rurali. Il modello del GAL dell’Ogliastra (Sardegna) per la valorizzazione delle risorse agro-alimentari e ambientali, p. 176. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calabrò, T., De Luca, A.I., Gulisano, G., Marcianò, C.: The rural governance system in leader plus: the application of an integrated planning methodology in Calabria (South Italy). New Medit 3, 38–46 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stöhr, C., Chabay, I.: Science and participation in governance of the Baltic Sea fisheries. Environ. Policy Gov. 20, 350–363 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Montis, A., Nijkamp, P.: Tourism and the political agenda: towards and integrated web-based multicriteria framework for conflict resolution. In: Giaoutzi, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds.) Tourism and Regional Development, pp. 177–200. Ashgate Publishing, England (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marcianò, C. (ed.) Participatory Rural Development Experiences in Calabria, Interreg IVC-Robinwood Plus, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria 92 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marcianò, C., Romeo, G.: Integrated local development in coastal areas: the case of the “Stretto” coast FLAG in Southern Italy. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 223, 379–385 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saaty, T.L.: Mathematical Methods of Operations Research. Dover Pub, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Cavicchi, A., Santini, C., Bailetti, L.: Mind the “academician-practitioner” gap: an experience based model in the food and beverage sector. Qual. Market Res. Int. J. 17, 319–335 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Santini, C., et al.: Reducing the distance between thinkers and doers in the entrepreneurial discovery process: an exploratory study. J. Bus. Res. 69, 1840–1844 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eden, C., Huxham, C.: Action research for management research. Br. J. Manag. 7, 75–86 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been supported by GASTROCERT, a Project on Gastronomy and Creative Entrepreneurship in Rural Tourism, funded by JPI-HERITAGE PLUS (2015–2018). The authors thank their collegues of the Technical Team: Luigi Autiello, Rosario Condarcuri, Vincenzo Crea, Carmela Franzese, Guido Mignolli, Monica Mollo, Carlo Murdolo, Nicola Ritorto, Sorana Russo, Stefano Zirilli, Alessandro Zito.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Marcianò .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marcianò, C., Romeo, G. (2019). Action Research and Participatory Decision-Aid Models in Rural Development: The Experience of “Terre Locridee” Local Action Group in Southern Italy. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 101. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics