Universal Design of ICT for Emergency Management

A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10907)


The primary objectives of this article are to give a systematic overview of the current state of the emerging research field of Universal Design of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Emergency Management, and to highlight high-impact research opportunities to ensure that the increasing introduction of ICT in Emergency Management can contribute to removing barriers instead of adding more barriers, in particular for the elderly and people with disabilities. A systematic review on various literature with respect to Universal Design, ICT and Emergency Management between 2008 to 2018 was employed in this study, and reviewed systematically using a predefined framework. The ultimate goal of this effort is to answer the following questions: (1) How strong is the coverage of research on Universal Design of ICT in Emergency Management in the different categories of Emergency Management ICT tools? (2) What potential next steps in research on Universal Design of ICT in Emergency Management have the highest potential impact in terms of improved Emergency Management and reduced Disaster Risk? We identify a set of gaps in the literature, indicating that there are some challenges where Universal Design is not so much taken into account in the technology development to support the different phases of the crisis management cycle. We also derive a research agenda based on areas that are missing in the literature, to serve a future research in the area of universal design and Emergency Management.


Universal Design of ICT Accessibility Emergency Management 


  1. 1.
    Bennett, D., Phillips, B.D., Davis, E.: The future of accessibility in disaster conditions: how wireless technologies will transform the life cycle of emergency management. Futures 87, 122–132 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Radianti, J., Gjøsæter, T., Chen, W.: Universal design of information sharing tools for disaster risk reduction. In: Second IFIP Conference on Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction, Sofia-Bulgaria (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wentz, B., et al.: Danger, danger! Evaluating the accessibility of web-based emergency alert sign-ups in the Northeastern United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(3), 488–497 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindell, M.K.: Emergency management. In: Bobrowsky, P.T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, pp. 263–271. Springer, Dordrecht (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aman, H., Irani, P., Liang, H.-N.: A review of information communication technology applied on common tasks during times of emergency. In: Proceedings of 9th International ISCRAM Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gill, A., Alam, S., Eustace, J.: Using social architecture to analyzing online social network use in emergency management (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, L., Goodchild, M.F.: The role of social networks in emergency management: a research agenda. In: Managing Crisis and Disasters with Emerging Technologies: Advancements: Advancements. E-pub ahead of print, p. 245 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, C.-M., Chan, E., Hyder, A.A.: Web 2.0 and internet social networking: a new tool for disaster management?-Lessons from Taiwan. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 10(1), 57 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gray, B., Weal, M., Martin, D.: Social media and disasters: a new conceptual framework (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morris, J.T., Mueller, J.L., Jones, M.L.: Use of social media during public emergencies by people with disabilities. West. J. Emerg. Med. 15(5), 567 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Backfried, G., et al.: Open source intelligence in disaster management. In: 2012 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC). IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lichter, M., Grinberger, A.Y., Felsenstein, D.: Simulating and communicating outcomes in disaster management situations. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 4(4), 1827–1847 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bell, D., Nusir, M.: Co-design for government service stakeholders. In: Proceedings of 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Engelman, A., et al.: Responding to the deaf in disasters: establishing the need for systematic training for state-level emergency management agencies and community organizations. BMC Health Serv. Res. 13(1), 84 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kane, S.K., Bigham, J.P.: Tracking@stemxcomet: teaching programming to blind students via 3D printing, crisis management, and Twitter. In: Proceedings of 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Díaz Pérez, P., Carroll, J.M., Cuevas, I.A.: Coproduction as an approach to technology-mediated citizen participation in emergency management (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jan, S., Lurie, N.: Disaster resilience and people with functional needs. N. Engl. J. Med. 367(24), 2272–2273 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuziemsky, C.E., O’Sullivan, T.L., Corneil, W.: An upstream-downstream approach for disaster management information systems design. In: Proceedings of ISCRAM Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meissen, U., Hardt, M., Voisard, A.: Towards a general system design for community-centered crisis and emergency warning systems. In: ISCRAM (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Doyle, J., Bertolotto, M., Wilson, D.: Evaluating the benefits of multimodal interface design for CoMPASS—a mobile GIS. GeoInformatica 14(2), 135–162 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Easton, C.: The digital divide, inclusion and access for disabled people in IT supported emergency response systems: a UK and EU-based analysis. In: ISCRAM (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cinnamon, J., Schuurman, N.: Confronting the data-divide in a time of spatial turns and volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 78(4), 657–674 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aryankhesal, A., Pakjouei, S., Kamali, M.: Safety needs of people with disabilities during earthquakes. Disaster Med. Publ. Health Preparedness 1–7 (2017).
  24. 24.
    Flanagan, B.E., et al.: A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 8(1) (2011). Article 3Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malizia, A., et al.: CAP-ONES: an emergency notification system for all. Int. J. Emerg. Manag. 6(3–4), 302–316 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McSweeney-Feld, M.H.: Assistive technology and older adults in disasters: implications for emergency management. Disaster Med. Publ. Health Preparedness 11(1), 135–139 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moseley, V., Dritsos, S.: Achieving earthquake resilience through design for all. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bromley, E., et al.: How do communities use a participatory public health approach to build resilience? The Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 14(10), 1267 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ito, A., et al.: A study of optimization of IDDD (Information Delivery System for Deaf People in a Major Disaster). In: First International Symposium on Computing and Networking (CANDAR). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malizia, A., et al.: SEMA4A: an ontology for emergency notification systems accessibility. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(4), 3380–3391 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Onorati, T., et al.: Modeling an ontology on accessible evacuation routes for emergencies. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(16), 7124–7134 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maryam, H., et al.: A survey on smartphones systems for emergency management (SPSEM). Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(6), 301–311 (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hosono, N., et al.: Urgent mobile tool for hearing impaired, language dysfunction and foreigners at emergency situation. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buttussi, F., et al.: Using mobile devices to support communication between emergency medical responders and deaf people. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Paulheim, H., et al.: Improving usability of integrated emergency response systems: the SoKNOS approach. GI Jahrestagung 154, 1435–1449 (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stary, C., Cronholm, S.: Method transfer across domains and disciplines: enriching universal access development. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 14, 145 (2015). SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Temnikova, I.P., Orasan, C., Mitkov, R.: CLCM - a linguistic resource for effective simplification of instructions in the crisis management domain and its evaluations (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Biswas, P., Langdon, P.: User interface design for developing countries. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Aman, H., Irani, P., Liang, H.-N.: A review of information communication technology applied on common tasks during times of emergency. In: ISCRAM (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
  2. 2.CIEMUniversity of AgderGrimstadNorway

Personalised recommendations