Meanings & Co. pp 213-266 | Cite as

Racism and Classism in Mexican Advertising

An Exhibition of Visual Messaging
Part of the Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress book series (NAHP, volume 6)


This paper explores how Mexico’s population has been faced with the polemics of class and race. This division continues today through the Mexican ruling class’s appropriation of advertising. I am interested in the functions and systems in place that allow this to propagate and how meaning is being reproduced unperceived by the audience. My thesis question asks, What are the visual representations of the power relationships in Mexico’s political economy as reflected through the appropriation of advertising? To answer this question, I perform a semiotic analysis of branded advertising messages created by the companies Bimbo, Palacio de Hierro and FEMSA, owned by the Mexican ruling families Servitje, Baillares and Garza respectively. Each television commercial is examined for signs, cultural codes, gestures, gaze and word tracks. These signs are decoded, and the conclusion is expressed through “An Exhibition of Visual Messaging”, designed to inform the Mexican public of how messages are constructed and received, empowering the viewer to interpret and challenge the meaning behind the communications they are receiving through the metamedia.


Classical Rules Advertisement Message Commercial Television Text Tracking Heavy Metal Music 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adorno, T., and M. Horkheimer. 2002. Dialectic of enlightenment, 94–136. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. 1972. Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  3. Barthes, R. 1974. S/Z. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  4. BBC. 2015. Accessed 8 July 2017.
  5. Bernays, Edward L. 1927. Propaganda/Edward Bernays; with an introduction by Mark Crispin Miller. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Ig Publishing, c2005.Google Scholar
  6. Bignell, J. 2002. Media semiotics: An introduction, 31–78. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Retrieved from Accessed 8 July 2015.
  7. Carrillo Trueba, Cesar. 2009. El racism en Mexico. Tercer Milenio. Mexico D.F.: CONCACULT.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, Daniel. 2001. Semiotic for beginners. Accessed July 24 2017.
  9. CIMA. 2013. Accessed 8 Aug 2017.
  10. CONAPRED. 2010., 40–45. Accessed 8 July 2017.
  11. Danesi, Marcel. 2002. Understanding media semiotics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  12. Danesi, Marcel. 2006. Brands. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  13. Danesi, Marcel. 2007. The quest for meaning. A guide to semiotic theory and practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Danesi, M. 2013. Encyclopedia of media and communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzpatrick, T.B. 1975. Soleil et peau [Sun and skin]. Journal de Médecine Esthétique 2: 33–34 (in French).Google Scholar
  16. Forbes. (FEMSA). Accessed 8 Aug 2015.
  17. Forbes. 2012. Accessed 8 Aug 2015.
  18. Foucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and punishment. London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
  19. Fuchs, Christian. 2005. Dallas Smythe today—The audience commodity, the digital labour debate, marxist political economy and critical theory. Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value. TripleC. ISSN 1726-67OX.Google Scholar
  20. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison notebooks; The study of philosophy, ed. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Gramsci, Antonio. 1992. Buttigieg. In Prison notebooks, ed. A. Joseph, 233–238. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, Calire. 2003. Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Technical Communication 50(1): 42–60.Google Scholar
  23. Hernández-Zárate, S.I., A. Medina-Bojórquez, A.L. López-Tello Santillán, and D. Alcalá-Pérez. 2012. Epidemiología del cáncer de piel en pacientes de la Clínica de Dermato-oncología del Centro Dermatológico Dr. Ladislao de la Pascua. Estudio retrospectivo de los últimos ocho años. Dermatol Rev Mex 56(1): 30–37.Google Scholar
  24. Horn, Robert. E. 1999. Information design: Emergence of a new profession. In Information design, ed. R. Jacobson, 15–33. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hussain, Nazia. 2010. Not just a pretty face: The cultural contexts of beauty in Asia. WPP Atticus Awards, Highly Commended, 19. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.Google Scholar
  26. INAH. 2009. Museo Nacional de la Historia. Mexico, D.F.: Chapultepec. Accessed 8 Aug 2017.
  27. INEGI. Accessed 8 Aug 2017.
  28. Jewitt, Carey, and Rumiko, Oyama. 2001. Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In Handbook of visual analysis, 134–156. ed. T. Can Leeuwen and C. Jewitt. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, Carl. 2006. El show de Guada y lupe. Colonia Roma, Mexico City: Galeria Films. Accessed 8 Aug 2017.
  30. León-Portilla, M. 1992. The broken spears: The Aztec accounts of the conquest of Mexico, 3–11. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lindlof, Thomas R. 2011. Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Lizcano Fernández, Francisco. 2005. Composición Étnica de las Tres Áreas Culturales del Continente Americano al Comienzo del Siglo XXI. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, num. Mayo-Agosto, Academic investigation (in Spanish), 196; 185–232. Mexico City: University of the State of Mexico.Google Scholar
  33. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich, Engels. 2006. The ruling class and the ruling ideas. In Media and cultural studies: keyworks, 9, ed. Meenakshi Gigi Durham and Douglas M. Kellner. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, Jacques-Alain. 1977. Suture (elements of the logic of the signifier). Screen 18(4) [The original French publication of this article was in 1966.].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MIRA. 2015. Newspaper Mexico City. Published Monday 3 Aug 2015. Edition 23.Google Scholar
  36. Morton, Adam David. 2011. Revolution and state in modern Mexico: The political economy of uneven development. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  37. Mulvey, Laura. 1975. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema, 6–18. Originally Published Screen 16.3 Autumn 1975. Scholar
  38. Palacio. 2015. Accessed 21 July 2017.
  39. Patterson, Jorge Zepeda. 2007. Los amos de Mexico. Mexico D.F.: Editorial Planeta Mexicana.Google Scholar
  40. Sachdeva, S. 2009. Fitzpatrick skin typing: Applications in dermatology. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology 75: 93–96. Accessed 8 Aug 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaheed, Farida. 2014. United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, 900., Accessed July 21 2017.
  42. Smythe, D.W. 1977. Communications: Blindspot of western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Society Theory 1 (3): 1–28.Google Scholar
  43. Sturken, M., and L. Cartwright. 2009. Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Teran/TBWA. (2015) Accessed July 24 2017.
  45. Townsend, Camilla. 2003. Burying the white gods: New perspectives on the conquest of Mexico. The American Historical Review 108(3): 659–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Triumph of the Will. 1935. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  47. Walker-Smith. 2006. CBS News Report. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  48. 2008. The role of helpers in advertising: Bridging the way from semiotics to storytelling. ed. Joseph Sassoon. Istanbul: ESOMAR. Qualitative Research.Google Scholar
  49. Velencoso, Andres. 2015. Accessed 8 July 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ryerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations