Advertisement

Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies & Language Aptitude

  • Jakob PoschnerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 16)

Abstract

According to the lexical approach in language teaching, it is lexis which functions as the most important building block for communication. Therefore, it is of great importance to examine how vocabulary, also in the form of multiword lexical units, can be acquired most efficiently. Vocabulary learning strategies haven been a constant field of research since the 1970s, providing linguists and teachers with information about different cognitive vocabulary learning strategies. Additionally, language aptitude tests improved significantly since their development and were able to prove their validity. Studies showed that low aptitude learners drastically improved with the help of specific vocabulary acquisition strategies, whereas high aptitude learners did not benefit from such strategies. Taking this finding into consideration, this research investigates whether people with a lower language aptitude use particular cognitive strategies more frequently compared to persons with a higher aptitude. A questionnaire has been designed to measure people’s preferences for various cognitive vocabulary acquisition strategies. The questionnaire focuses on three well known and two little-known, but innovative, strategies: learning vocabulary with the help of pictorial representations, grouping corresponding words together, antonyms and synonyms, using physical actions accompanying vocabulary learning and the keyword method. A total of 19 German native speakers participated in the study. The LLAMA B test has been chosen to measure vocabulary acquisition aptitude. The research shows that low aptitude learners do not use significantly more cognitive vocabulary acquisition strategies than high aptitude learners.

References

  1. Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern language aptitude test (Form A). New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  2. Cofer, C. N., Bruce, D. R., & Reicher, G. M. (1966). Clustering in free recall as a function of certain methodological variations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 858–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dinklage, K. T. (1971). Inability to learn a foreign language. Emotional Problems of the Student, 99, 185–206.Google Scholar
  4. Doughty, C. J., Campbell, S. G., Mislevy, M. A., Bunting, M. F., Bowles, A. R., & Koeth, J. T. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In M. P. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S. Lee (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second language research forum: Exploring SLA perspectives, positions, and practices (pp. 10–31). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
  5. Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 27, 513–543.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gliksman, L., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1979). An investigation of the test-retest reliability of the subscales of the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT). Canadian Modern Language Review, 5, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Granena, G. (2014). Language aptitude and long-term achievement in early childhood L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 483–503.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Granena, G., & Long, M. (2013). Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. Hengstschläger, M. (2012). Die Durchschnittsfalle: Gene – Talente – Chancen. Salzburg, Austria: Ecowin Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Hulstijn, J. H. (1997). Second language acquisition research in the laboratory: Possibilities and limitations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 131–143.Google Scholar
  11. Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802365567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kopstein, F. F., & Roshal, S. M. (1954). Learning foreign vocabulary from pictures vs. words. American Psychologist, 9, 407–408.Google Scholar
  13. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Macedonia, M. (2013). Learning a second language naturally the voice movement icon approach. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(2), 102–116.  https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v3n2p102
  15. Macedonia, M., & Knösche, R. T. (2011). Body in mind: How gestures empower foreign language learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(4), 196–211.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01129.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2010). Neural correlates of high performance in foreign language vocabulary learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01091.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32(6), 982–998.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
  19. Meara, P., Milton, J., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2003). Swansea Language Aptitude Tests (LAT) v.2.0. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
  20. Peßensteiner, S. (2014). Wie bleiben die Wörter im Kopf? Gehirngerechter Wortschatzerwerb im Französischunterricht. Diploma thesis, University of Graz.Google Scholar
  21. Ranta, L. (2002). The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 159–180). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Tellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8, 219–235.  https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.2.06tel CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson, I. (1987). Memory in language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubins (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Webber, N. E. (1978). Pictures and words as stimuli in learning foreign language responses. The Journal of Psychology, 98, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wieland, L. R. (1990). The effects of training and the keyword method on the recall of an unfamiliar vocabulary. PhD thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  28. Wyra, M., Lawson, M. J., & Hungi, N. (2007). The mnemonic keyword method: The effects of bidirectional retrieval training and of ability to image on foreign language vocabulary recall. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 360–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Linguistics & Department of English and American StudiesUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations