Advertisement

Making Music and Learning Languages – Musicality and Grammar Aptitude

  • Daniel Malzer
Chapter
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 16)

Abstract

Research on correlations between musicality and language aptitude have been predominantly investigating the phonetic aspect of language processing. The current state of research suggests a strong and stable link between musicality and receptive language abilities, such as recognition of sounds, intonation and stress patterns, as well as productive skills. Relatively fewer studies have explored relations of musicality and grammar aptitude, despite neurological studies highlighting similar brain regions involved in the processing of musical, especially rhythmic, as well as grammatical patterns. This paper thus aims to investigate if musical training and musicality does indeed relate to grammatical skills. It is hypothesised that extensive musical training does not only impact the musical ear but also the ability to de- and encode structures, as well as the capacity to recognise and retain complex sequences. These specific skills are widely recognised to be involved in the acquisition of novel grammar. Research was conducted by testing a sample of 25 participants, which was split into two groups, musicians and non-musicians. Musicality of all participants was assessed and a grammar achievement test was issued. The results suggest a strong correlation between musical training, musicality and grammatical aptitude.

References

  1. Bekius, A., Cope, T. E., & Grube, M. (2016). The beat to read: A cross-lingual link between rhythmic regularity perception and reading skill. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(425), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bermudez, P., Lerch, J., Evans, A., & Zatorre, R. (2009). Neuroanatomical correlates of musicianship as revealed by cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry. Cerebral Cortex, 19(7), 1583–1596.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S., Martinez, M., & Parsons, L. (2006). Music and language side by side in the brain: A PET study of the generation of melodies and sentences. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10), 2791–2803.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04785.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser R. (Ed). (2009). Training, research, and education. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of PsychoLinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959). The modern languages aptitude test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  8. Chobert, J., & Besson, M. (2013). Musical expertise and second language learning. Brain Sciences, 3(2), 923–940.  https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci3020923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiner, M., & Reiterer, M. S. (2015). A Mozart is not a Pavarotti: Singers outperform instrumentalists on foreign accent imitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(482), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Council of Europe. (2011). The common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Fernald, A., & Mcroberts, G. (1996). Prosodic bootstrapping: A critical analysis of the argument and the evidence. In Morgan, J., & Demuth K. (Eds.). (1996) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquistion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Flöel, A., de Vries, M., Scholz, J., Breitenstein, C., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2009). White matter integrity in the vicinity of Broca’s area predicts grammar learning success. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1974–1981.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fonseca-Mora, C., Toscano-Fuentes, C., & Wermke, K. (2011). Melodies that help: The relation between language aptitude and musical intelligence. International Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 101–118.Google Scholar
  16. Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(27), 9240–9245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golestani, N., Alario, X., Meriaux, S., Le Behian, D., Dehaene, S., & Pallier, C. (2006). Syntax production in bilinguals. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1029–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon, R., Jacobs, M., Schuele, M., & Mcauley, D. (2015). Perspectives on the rhythm-grammar link and its implications for typical and atypical language development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grigorenko, E., Sternberg, R., & Ehrman, M. (2000). A theory- based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Honing, H., ten Cate, C., Peretz, I., & Trehub, S. (2015). Without it no music: Cognition, biology and evolution of musicality. Philosophical Transaction B, 370(1664), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hulstijn, J. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(02), 129–140.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Indefrey, P., Hellwig, F., Herzog, H., Seitz, R., & Hagoort, P. (2004). Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances. Brain and Language, 89(2), 312–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00352-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. James, C., Oechslin, M., van de Ville, D., Hauert, C., Descloux, C., & Lazeyras, F. (2014). Musical training intensity yields opposite effects on grey matter density in cognitive versus sensorimotor networks. Brain Structure and Function, 219(1), 353–366.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-013-0504-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jilka, M. (2009). Talent and proficiency in language. In Dogil G., & Reiterer M. S. (Eds.). (2009). Language talent and brain activity. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  26. Kalcheva, I., & Fonseca-Mora, M. C. (2017). Musical experience in singing and grammar achievement in English language acquisition. Foreign languages and the contemporary higher education conference proceedings VIII, International Scientific Conference, 23–25 June 2017, Varna, Bulgaria, 391–397.Google Scholar
  27. Kepinska, O., de Rover, M., Caspers, J., & Schiller, N. (2016). On neural correlates of individual differences in novel grammar learning: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 98, 156–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koelsch, S. (2005). Neural substrates of processing syntax and semantics in music. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 207–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-75121-3_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koelsch, S., Gunter, T., Wittfoth, M., & Sammler, D. (2005). Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1162/089892905774597290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(8), 599–605.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kunert, R., Willems, R., Casasanto, D., Patel, A., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Music and language syntax interact in Broca’s area: An fMRI study. PLoS One, 10(11), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Link, J., Osthus, P., Koeth, J., & Bunting, M. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T., & Friederici, A. (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4(5), 540–545.  https://doi.org/10.1038/87502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maidhof, C., & Koelsch, S. (2011). Effects of selective attention on syntax processing in music and language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2252–2267.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.2154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marcus, G. (2012). Musicality: Instinct or acquired skill? Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 498–512.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01220.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marie, C., Delogu, F., Lampis, G., Olivetti, B. M., & Besson, M. (2011). Influence of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in mandarin Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marques, C., Moreno, S., Luís, C. S., & Besson, M. (2007). Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1453–1463.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mazuka, R. (2007). The rhythm-based prosodic bootstrapping hypothesis of early language acquisition: Does it work for learning for all languages? Gengo Kenkyú, 132, 1–11.Google Scholar
  40. Meara, P. (2005). LLama language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
  41. Milovanova, R., Huotilainenc, M., Välimäkid, V., Esquefd, P., & Tervaniemic, M. (2008). Musical aptitude and second language pronunciation skills in school-aged children: Neural and behavioral evidence. Brain Research, 1194, 81–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nauchi, A., & Sakai, K. (2009). Greater leftward lateralization of the inferior frontal gyrus in second language learners with higher syntactic abilities. Human Brain Mapping, 30(11), 3625–3635.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Overy, K., Nicolson, R., Fawcett, A., & Clarke, E. (2003). Dyslexia and music: Measuring musical timing skills. Dyslexia, 9(1), 18–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oxford Language Aptitude Test (and Solution Form). (2013). Oxford University. Retrieved from http://www.classics.ox.ac.uk/tests.html?file=tl_files/Downloads/CLAT%20Tests/CAT%202013.pdf. http://www.classics.ox.ac.uk/tests.html?file=tl_files/Downloads/CLAT%20Tests/CLAT%202013%20solutions.pdf.Google Scholar
  45. Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. (2010). Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2728–2744.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pastuszek-Lipinska, B. (2004). An overview of a research project and preliminary results of two experiments on perception and production of foreign language sounds by musicians and non-musicians. TMH-QPSR, 46(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
  47. Patel, A., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M., & Holocomb, P. (1998). Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(6), 717–733.  https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998563121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pei, Z., Wu, Y., Xiang, X., & Qian, H. (2016). The effects of musical aptitude and musical training on phonological production in foreign languages. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 19–29.  https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pimsleur, P. (1966). The Pimsleur language aptitude battery. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovic.Google Scholar
  50. Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schoen-Nazzaro, M. (1978). Plato and Aristotle on the ends of music. Laval théologique et philosophique, 34(3), 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Slevc, R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second-language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17(8), 675–681.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01765.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sluming, V., Barrick, T., Howard, M., Cezayirli, E., Mayes, A., & Roberts, N. (2002). Voxel-based morphometry reveals increased gray matter density in Broca’s area in male symphony orchestra musicians. NeuroImage, 17(3), 1613–1622.  https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Kemler, N., Deborah, G., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from Prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 249–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00024-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strait, D., Hornickel, J., & Kraus, N. (2011). Subcortical processing of speech regularities underlies reading and music aptitude in children. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 7(44), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-7-44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Strait, D., & Kraus, N. (2011). Playing music for a smarter ear: Cognitive, perceptual and neurobiological evidence. Music Perception, 29(2), 133–146.  https://doi.org/10.1525/MP.2011.29.2.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strauß, H., Shakeshaft, N., Plomin, R., & Zentner, M. (2015). Introducing the mini-proms: A short and objective measure of musical ability. International convention of psychological science (ICPS), 12–14 March 2015, Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://www.uibk.ac.at/psychologie/fachbereiche/pdd/personality_assessment/research/download/minipromsposter_2015.pdf
  58. Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (2014). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Volz, M. (2005). Improvisation begins with exploration. Music Educators Journal, 92(1), 50–53.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3400227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yalçın, Ş., Sevdeğer, Ç., & Erçetin, G. (2016). The relationship between aptitude and working memory: An instructed SLA context. Language Awareness, 25(1), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Malzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of English and American StudiesUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations