Advertisement

Visioning

  • Laurence L. DelinaEmail author
Chapter
  • 149 Downloads

Abstract

In the continuum that describes social movements, the most important phase is when a large majority of people starts to actively respond to the social issue by engaging in political actions and in changing their personal behaviours and mindsets. People could be provided with this new sense of collective identity and ownership when campaigners offer them a clear and unified regime alternative. This chapter asks how can climate action campaigners construct a new vision for a stable climate era, what are the complexities involved in these processes, what examples are blossoming elsewhere, how do they materialised, and how could these be used as visioning materials for climate actions, and, lastly, what are the weaknesses of this strategy as experienced in other social action campaigns.

Keywords

Behavioural change Vision Community energy 

References

  1. Adam, E. M. (2017). Intersectional coalitions: The paradoxes of rights-based movement building in LBTQ and immigrant communities. Law & Society Review, 51, 132–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barboza, T. (2014, September 22). L.A., Houston, Philadelphia mayors vow more action on climate change. Los Angeles Times. http://lat.ms/1odyfOn.
  3. Bomberg, E., & McEwen, N. (2012). Mobilizing community energy. Energy Policy, 51, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40). (2015). C40 Cities. http://bit.ly/1ir0TJ5.
  5. C40, UN Secretary General’s Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change, & Stockholm Environment Institute. (2014, September). Advancing Climate Ambition: Cities as Partners in Global Climate Action. http://bit.ly/1yGBKXC.
  6. Chandler, D. (2004). Building global civil society ‘from below’? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33, 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. City Government of New York. (2014). One City, Built to Last: Transforming New York City’s Buildings for a Low-Carbon Future. http://on.nyc.gov/1pJQQRB.
  8. City of Eugene. (2010). A Community Climate and Energy Action Plan for Eugene. http://bit.ly/1vEpT6r.
  9. Cleantechnica. (2013). Germany: 100% Renewable Energy and Beyond. RenewEconomy. http://bit.ly/12e7iT6.
  10. Delina, L. (2018). Can energy democracy thrive in a non-democracy? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delina, L., Diesendorf, M., & Merson, J. (2014). Strengthening the climate action movement: Strategies from histories. Carbon Management, 5, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Della Porta, D. (2005). Multiple belongings, tolerant identities, and the construction of ‘another politics’: Between the European social forum and the local social fora. In D. Della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 401, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diani, M. (1995). Green Networks. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 360–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, D. R., Dow, D. M., & Ray, R. (2017). Intersectionality takes it to the streets: Mobilizing across diverse interests for the Women’s March. Science Advances, 3, eaao1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ganz, M. (2006b). Mobilizing power: Analysis, strategy, deliberation. In Organizing Course Notes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School. http://bit.ly/1xcbrGW.
  20. Hopkins, R. (2008). The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience. Totnes, Devon, UK: Green Books.Google Scholar
  21. Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2008). The self-defensive cognition of self-defense. American Criminal Law Review, 45, 1–65.Google Scholar
  22. Landy, D. (2015). Bringing the outside field interaction and transformation from below in political struggles. Social Movement Studies, 14, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lovell, H., Hann, V., & Watson, P. (2018). Rural laboratories and experiments at the fringes: A case study of a smart grid on Bruny Island, Australia. Energy Research & Social Science, 36, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Markowitz, E. M., & Shariff, A. F. (2012). Climate change and moral judgment. Nature Climate Change, 2, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging Codes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moser, S. C. (2009). Costly knowledge—Unaffordable denial: The politics of public understanding and engagement on climate change. In M. T. Boykoff (Ed.), The Politics of Climate Change: A Survey (pp. 155–181). Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. North, P. (2011). The politics of climate activism in the UK: A social movement analysis. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1581–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. North, P., & Longhurst, N. (2013). Grassroots localization? The scalar potential of and limits of the ‘transition’ approach to climate change and resource constraint. Urban Studies, 50, 1423–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Neill, S. J., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oteman, M., Wiering, M., & Helderman, J.-K. (2014). The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy: A comparative case study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Energy Sustainability and Society, 4, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parag, Y., Capstick, S., & Poortinga, W. (2011). Policy attribute framing: A comparison between three policy instruments for personal emissions reduction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 889–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Renewables 100 Policy Institute. (2007). What We Are. http://bit.ly/15AqFL8.
  35. Saunders, C. (2008). Double-edged swords? Collective identity and solidarity in the environmental movement. The British Journal of Sociology, 59, 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schock, K. (2005). Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movement in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., & Smith, A. (2013). A thousand flowers blooming? An Examination of Community Energy in the UK, Energy Policy, 61, 977–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013). The role of emotion in global warming support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34, 937–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snow, D. A. (2013). Framing and social movements. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.Google Scholar
  41. Snow, D. A., Rochford, B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoknes, P. E. (2015). What We Think About When We Try Not to Think About Global Warming. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea.Google Scholar
  43. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tilly, C. (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1754–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Tilly, C. (2002). Stories, Identities and Political Change. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  46. Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious Performances. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2011). Hot Cities: Battle-Ground for Climate Change. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
  48. Van der Schoor, T., & Scholtens, B. (2015). Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 666–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yagatich, W., Galli Robertson, A. M., & Fisher, D. R. (2018). How local environmental stewardship diversifies democracy. Local Environment, 23, 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range FutureBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations