Face-to-face interactions remain key in turning talk into effective climate actions. While this opportunity is already present among climate action groups, there are still gaps that need to be understood, filled, and reflected upon when messengers relate with their audiences. This chapter asks how can climate action campaigners orient their dialogues and conversations to ensure stronger engagement with their audience, what are the strengths and limits observed by contemporary social action groups when building relationships with their publics, how can these strengths be translated into other spaces and audiences, and what the weaknesses tell and what practical lessons emerged from these experiences.
KeywordsClimate communication Face-to-face activism Public engagement
- Arabella Advisors. (2014). Measuring the global fossil fuel divestment movement. http://bit.ly/1reDL6Q.
- Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) Environment. (2013, 1 August). ‘Unitarian church divests from fossil fuels.’ ABC News, http://ab.co/1lIDjJZ.
- Bertini, I. (2014, September 23). Church of Sweden completed fossil fuels divestment as movement doubles in one year. Blue & Green Tomorrow. http://bit.ly/1wLlKyM.
- Delina, L. (2016). Strategies for Rapid Climate Mitigation: Wartime Mobilisation as Model for Action? Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Diesendorf, M. (2009). Climate Action: A Campaign Manual for Greenhouse Solutions. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
- Fisher, D. R., & McInerney, P.-B. (2012). The limits of networks in social movement retention: On canvassers and their careers. Mobilization: An International Journal, 17, 109–128.Google Scholar
- Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Germinando alternativas al desarrollo. América Latina en movimiento, 462, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Hannam, P. (2014, October 20). More Australian universities come under pressure to divest from fossil fuels. The Sydney Morning Herald. http://bit.ly/1qLBZI3.
- Islar, M., & Busch, H. (2016). “We are not in this to save the polar bears!”—The link between community renewable energy development and ecological citizenship. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29, 303–319.Google Scholar
- Kirby, A. (2008). A UN Guide to Climate Neutrality. Malta: United Nations Environment Programme and GRID-Arendal.Google Scholar
- Maxmin, C. (2017, June 5). How Harvard divestment was won. The Nation.Google Scholar
- Moser, SC., & Dilling, L. (Eds.). (2007). Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Raushenbush, P. B. (2013, July 2). Fossil fuel divestment strategy passes at United Church of Christ Convention (UCC). The Huffington Post. http://huff.to/1xVzYfC.
- Schor, J. B. (2010). Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth. New York, USA: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Snow, D. A. (2013). Framing and social movements. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Vala, C. T., & O’Brien, K. J. (2007). Attraction without networks: Recruiting strangers to unregistered protestantism in China. Mobilization, 12, 79–94.Google Scholar