• Laurence L. DelinaEmail author


While the Paris Agreement can be hailed as an important milestone for global climate action, addressing the climate challenge by curtailing future emissions remains an important agenda for climate activism. More than before, the climate action movement needs to be strengthened of its campaigns, tactics, and strategies. Despite the heterogeneity of the many actors comprising this movement and the variations in their campaigns, tactics, and strategies, each of these actors can be strengthened in its capacity for a series of and parallel climate actions, in terms of better understanding of climate-related issues, logical response particularly its solutions, and engagement through behavioural changes in consumption and supporting alternatives to fossil-based energy regimes.


Climate actions Paris Agreement Social movement Climate activism 


  1. Ackerman, P., & Kruegler, C. (1994). Strategic Nonviolent Conflict: The Dynamics of People Power in the Twentieth Century. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cinderby, S., Haq, G., Cambridge, H., & Lock, K. (2015). Building community resilience: Can everyone enjoy a good life? Local Environment, 21, 1252–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Climate Action Tracker. (2015, November 13). G20—All INDCs in, but Large Gap Remains. Berlin, Germany: Climate Analytics and Ecofys; Potsdam, Germany: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; and Cologne, Germany: NewClimate Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, R. (2010). The contentious social interactionism of Charles Tilly. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cumbers, A., Routledge, P., & Nativel, C. (2008). The entangled geographies of global justice networks. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delina, L., Diesendorf, M., & Merson, J. (2014). Strengthening the climate action movement strategies from histories. Carbon Management, 5, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diesendorf, M. (2009). Climate Action: A Campaign Manual for Greenhouse Solutions. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  9. Featherstone, D. (2005). Towards the relational construction of militant particularisms: On why the geographies of past struggles matter for resistance to neoliberal globalisation. Antipode, 37, 250–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Featherstone, D. (2008). Resistance, Space and Political Identities: The Making of Counter-Global Networks. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foran, J. (2014). “¡Volveremos!/we will return”: The state of play for the global climate justice movement. Interface, 6, 454–477.Google Scholar
  12. Foxon, T. J. (2013). Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future. Energy Policy, 52, 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganz, M. (2004). Why David sometimes wins: Strategic capacity in social movements. In D. M. Messick & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), The Psychology of Leadership: New Perspectives and Research. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Ganz, M. (2006a). Strategy, deliberation and meetings. In Organizing Course Notes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
  15. Ganz, M. (2006b). Mobilizing power: Analysis, strategy, deliberation. In Organizing Course Notes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
  16. Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. T. (2015). Environmental movements in advanced industrial democracies: Heterogeneity, transformation and institutionalization. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleditsch, K. S., & Celestino, M. R. (2013). Fresh carnations or all thorn, no rose? Non-violent campaigns and transitions in autocracies. Journal of Peace Research, 50, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haas, T., & Sander, H. (2016). Shortcomings and perspectives of the German Energiewende. Socialism and Democracy, 30, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hopkins, R. (2008). The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience. Totnes, Devon, UK: Green Books.Google Scholar
  20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report of the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC. The Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri & L. Meyer (Eds.). Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  21. Klein, N. (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power, Volume 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Moser, S. C. (2007a). Communication strategies to mobilize the climate movement. In J. Isham & S. Waage (Eds.), Ignition: What You Can Do to Fight Global Warming and Spark a Movement (pp. 73–95). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moser, S. C. (2007b). In the long shadows of inaction: The quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States. Global Environmental Politics 7, 124–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moser, S. C. (2007c). More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change (pp. 64–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Moser, S. C. (2009). Costly knowledge—Unaffordable denial: The politics of public understanding and engagement on climate change. In M. T. Boykoff (Ed.), The Politics of Climate Change: A Survey (pp. 155–181). Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (Eds.). (2007). Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Moyer, B. (1987). The Movement Action Plan: A Strategic Framework Describing the Eight Stages of Successful Social Movements. The Social Movement Empowerment Project.
  30. Moyer, B., McAllister, J., Finley, M. L., & Soifer, S. (2001). Doing Democracy: The MAP Model for Organizing Social Movements. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. National Research Council. (2002). New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  32. North, P. (2011). The politics of climate activism in the UK: A social movement analysis. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1581–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosewarne, S., Goodman, J., & Pearse, R. (2014). Climate Action Upsurge: The Ethnography of Climate Movement Politics. Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Routledge, P. (2012). Translocal climate justice solidarities. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., & Smith, A. (2013). A thousand flowers blooming? An Examination of Community Energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 61, 977–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharp, G. (1973a). The Politics of Nonviolent Action: Part One, Power and Struggle. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  37. Sharp, G. (1973b). The Politics of Nonviolent Action: Part Two, the Method of Nonviolent Action. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  38. Snow, D. A. (2013). Framing and social movements. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarrow, S. (2005). The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tilly, C. (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1754–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tilly, C. (2002). Stories, Identities and Political Change. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  42. Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious Performances. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC/INFORMAL/84).

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range FutureBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations