Skip to main content

Science Today

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rise of Science

Abstract

90% of all the scientists who have ever lived are alive today. By contrast, less than 7% of all the people who have ever lived are alive today. It has been estimated that there were a few hundred scientists in the mid-1700s. If the number of scientists had increased at the same rate as the overall population, the number of scientists today would be a few thousand. Instead, according to UNESCO, there are about eight million researchers in the world today. The increase in the number of scientists over the last couple of hundred years is thousands of times the increase in the overall population. The growth rate in the number of scientists since the mid-1700s has been about 4% per year, corresponding to a doubling time of about 18 years and far faster than the approximately 0.8% per year growth rate for the overall population over that period. Currently in China the number of researchers is increasing at the furious rate of 6.6% per year, while its overall population is growing at just 0.6 % per year. There is no question that the number of scientists has increased dramatically over the last few hundred years (see Fig. 4.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Larsen and von Ins (2010) The Rate of Growth in Scientific publication and the Decline in Coverage Provided by Science Citation Index.

  2. 2.

    Bornmann and Mutz (2014) Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Number of Publications and Cited references.

  3. 3.

    Doudna and Sternberg (2017) A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution.

  4. 4.

    Beijing-Shanghai-Jiangsu-Guangdong.

  5. 5.

    The atomic bomb is based on the splitting of uranium or plutonium nuclei, and the hydrogen bomb is based on the fusion of hydrogen nuclei to release energy. As physicists probed deeper and deeper into fundamental physics, would they find more subatomic processes that release huge amounts of energy? After almost 70 years of further research, the answer is yes. In late 2017 Marek Karliner and Jonathan Rosner showed that quarks—the constituents of protons and neutrons—can also fuse and release an amount of energy similar to that of hydrogen fusion in one case and ten times greater in another. At present the very short lifetimes of the quarks preclude any practical applications.

  6. 6.

    Ripple et al. (2017).

  7. 7.

    Nixey (2017) The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World.

  8. 8.

    Larson and Witham (1998) Leading scientists still reject God.

  9. 9.

    Stirrat and Cornwall (2013) Eminent scientists reject the supernatural: a survey of the Fellows of the Royal Society.

  10. 10.

    According to some definitions, agnosticism is as much a belief (“unknowable”) as are theism and atheism.

  11. 11.

    Giles, J. (2005) Internet Encyclopaedias go Head to Head.

  12. 12.

    This example comes from the excellent essay entitled “I, Pencil”, written by Leonard Read (1958).

Further Reading

  • Bornmann L, Mutz R (2014) Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Number of Publications and Cited References. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66.10.1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Doudna JA, Sternberg SH (2017) A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles J (2005) Internet Encyclopaedias go Head to Head. Nature 438, 900

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen PO, von Ins M (2010) The Rate of Growth in Scientific Publication and the Decline in Coverage Provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics Vol. 84, p. 575

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson EJ, Witham L (1998) Leading scientists still reject God. Nature 394, 313

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixey C (2017) The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple et al. (2017), World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice. Bioscience Volume 67, Issue 12, p. 1026

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirrat M, Cornwall RE (2013) Eminent scientists reject the supernatural: a survey of the Fellows of the Royal Society. Evolution, Education and Outreach 20136, 33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shaver, P. (2018). Science Today. In: The Rise of Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91812-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics