Advertisement

An Exploration of Interaction Design Methodologies for Education: Comparing Professional vs. Educational Approaches, and Investigating the Role of Local Design Cultures

  • Yichen WuEmail author
  • Margherita PillanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10919)

Abstract

The connected objects, also named as smart devices, are now very popular and influential in our lives; their design is a hot issue for education in universities around the world, notably, in China, where some universities are updating their programs, and are evolving from traditional Industrial Design to Interaction (IxD) and User Experience Design (UX Design). To this respect, we observed a gap between the IxD and UX Design methods as they are presented in most academic literatures, and the design processes employed in the professional activities; we found this gap as evidence not only in China but also in Western countries. In this context, this research aims to study how to effectively include IxD and UX Design methodologies in the programs of Industrial Design academic courses of an art backgrounded university, so to raise the ability of students to design connected objects, while maintaining the skills that are characteristics of the traditional Chinese design schools. In this research, we use China Academy of Art as the experimental environment as it is a typical art backgrounded university, and due to the cooperation with the authors. Our main focus is on the Chinese design system, and we aim at defining education programs for university courses, so to make them coherent with the professional requirements of the IxD related industry. The results produced in our research have a more general interest since some conclusions we achieved can offer hints for a critical thinking and a theoretical contribution about IxD tools and methods.

Keywords

Design education Design methodology Interaction design User experience design Connected products 

References

  1. 1.
    Wu, Y., Pillan, M.: From respect to change user behaviour. Research on how to design a next generation of smart home objects from User Experience and Interaction Design. Des. J. 20(sup1), S3884–S3898 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kortuem, G., et al.: Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput. 14(1), 44–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zouganeli, E., Svinnset, I.E.: Connected objects and the internet of things—A paradigm shift. In: International Conference on Photonics in Switching, PS 2009. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gartner, Inc.: Gartner Says 8.4 Billion Connected “Things” Will Be in Use in 2017, Up 31 Percent From 2016. https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3598917. Accessed 1 Feb 2018
  5. 5.
    Analysys.: Chinese smart objects industry development special analysis 2017. https://www.analysys.cn/analysis/8/detail/1001082/. Accessed 28 Jan 2018
  6. 6.
    Findeli, A., Bousbaci, R.: L’eclipse de l’object dans les theories du project en design. In: Communication au 6ieme Colloque International et biennale del l’Academie Europeenne de Design EAD – European Academy of Design, Breme (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karjaluoto, E.: The Design Method: A Philosophy and Process for Functional Visual Communication. New Riders (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rowland, C., et al.: Designing Connected Products: UX for the Consumer Internet of Things. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Follett, J.: Designing for Emerging Technologies: UX for Genomics, Robotics, and the Internet of Things. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du, S.X., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Lu, J.X.: A Comparative Study of Industrial Design Education at domestic and overseas. Chin. Digit. Educ. 2, 38–43 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    He, X.Y.: The initial stage of Chinese Industrial Design education. Innov. Des. 5, 11–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kouprie, M., Visser, F.S.: A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J. Eng. Des. 20(5), 437–448 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, G.Z.: Design Methodology. China Higher Education Press, Beijing (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pillan, M., Spadafora, M., Vitali, A.A.: Sketching interactive experiences: video scenario to support imagination and co-design. In: DS 81: Proceedings of NordDesign 2014, Espoo, Finland, 27–29th August 2014 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations