Development of a Data-Driven Business Model Transformation Tool

  • Dominik Augenstein
  • Christian Fleig
  • Alexander Maedche
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10844)

Abstract

Rapidly changing environments and customer demands force companies to transform their business models in ever shorter periods of time. However, existing approaches like the business model canvas and corresponding tools mainly focus on documentation on a strategic level and do not actively support the business model transformation process from a current state towards a target state. To address this problem, we derive requirements for a business model transformation tool. We translate these requirements into design principles and present a toolset for data-driven business model transformation. This toolset enables companies to extract status quo business models from existing operational information systems. Furthermore, it allows the representation of explicit relationships between the different value dimensions of a business model and enables quantifying the impact of changes. The result of this paper is a set of requirements, design principles as well as a tool instantiation, which can actively support the business model transformation process.

Keywords

Business model Transformation Design science 

References

  1. 1.
    Piccinini, E., Gregory, R.W., Kolbe, L.M.: Changes in the producer-consumer relationship-towards digital transformation (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ostrom, A.L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D.E., et al.: Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. J. Serv. Res. 18(2), 127–159 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebel, P., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J.M.: Leveraging virtual business model innovation: a framework for designing business model development tools. Inf. Syst. J. 26(5), 519–550 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osterwalder, A.: The business model ontology – a proposition in a design science approach (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veit, D., Clemons, E., Benlian, A., et al.: Business models - an information systems research agenda. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindgren, P., Rasmussen, O.H.: The business model cube. J. Multi Bus. Model Innov. Technol. 1(2), 135–182 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The Business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37(4), 1019–1042 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Toronto (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Valentin, C., Burkhart, T., Vanderhaeghen, D., et al.: Towards a framework for transforming business models into business processes. In: AMCIS 2012 Proceedings (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonakdar, A., Weiblen, T., Di Valentin, C., et al.: Transformative influence of business processes on the business model: classifying the state of the practice in the software industry. In: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2013), pp. 3920–3929. IEEE, Piscataway (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richardson, J.: The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strateg. Change 17(5–6), 133–144 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Allen, J.: The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. J. Bus. Res. 58(6), 726–735 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alt, R., Zimmermann, H.-D.: Introduction to special section–business models. Electron. Mark. 11(1), 3–9 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doz, Y.L., Kosonen, M.: Embedding strategic agility: a leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Plan. 43(2), 370–382 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wirtz, B.W.: Business Model Management: Design - Instruments - Success Factors, 1st edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kley, F., Lerch, C., Dallinger, D.: New business models for electric cars - a holistic approach. Energy Policy 39(6), 3392–3403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Timmers, P.: Business models for electronic markets. Electron. Mark. 8(2), 3–8 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zott, C., Amit, R.: Business model design: an activity system perspective. Bus. Models 43(2–3), 216–226 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    NEFFICS Platform—NEFFICS. http://neffics.eu/platform/. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
  20. 20.
    Value Management Platform - VDMbee. https://vdmbee.com/work/value-management-platform/. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
  21. 21.
    Lindgardt, Z., Reeves, M., Stalk, G., et al.: Business model innovation. When the game gets tough, change the game. The Boston Consulting Group (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M., Kagermann, H.: Reinventing your business model. Harv. Bus. Rev. 86(12), 57–68 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berman, B.: Marketing Channels. Wiley, London (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosenbloom, B.: Marketing Channels. Cengage Learning, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Magretta, J: Why Business Models Matter. Harvard Business School Publishing, ‎Brighton (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zott, C., Amit, R.: Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 18(2), 181–199 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kinder, T.: Emerging e-commerce business models: an analysis of case studies from West Lothian, Scotland. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 5(3), 130–151 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Akkermans, J.M., Gordijn, J.: Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requir. Eng. 8(2), 114–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design science research in information systems (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zainal, Z.: Case study as a research method. J. Kemanus. 9, 1–6 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaliudis, A.: TRUMPF realisiert Pilotfabrik für Industrie 4.0 (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soder, J.: Use case production: Von CIM über Lean Production zu Industrie 4.0. In: Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M., Vogel-Heuser, B. (eds.) Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik, pp. 85–102. Springer, Wiesbaden (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04682-8_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Steegmüller, D., Zürn, M.: Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme für den Automobilbau der Zukunft. In: Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M., Vogel-Heuser, B. (eds.) Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik, pp. 103–119. Springer, Wiesbaden (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04682-8_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miller, G., Pawloski, J., Standridge, C.R.: A case study of lean, sustainable manufacturing. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 3(1), 11–32 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bartholomew, D.: Putting Lean Principles in the Warehouse (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marchwinski, C.: Following Four Steps to a Lean Material-Handling System Leads to a Leap in Performance (2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marchwinski, C.: Toothbrush Plant Reverses Decay in Competitiveness (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Augenstein, D., Fleig, C.: Exploring design principles for a business model mining tool. In: International Conference on Information Systems 2017, Seoul, South Korea (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominik Augenstein
    • 1
  • Christian Fleig
    • 1
  • Alexander Maedche
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Information Systems and Marketing (IISM)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations