Abstract
Behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions presume a causal story. This causal story is used to create a conceptual model of why the intervention caused the observed outcome. Methods are needed to investigate the extent to which changes in the outcome are due to exposure to an intervention. This chapter describes the use of a factorial experiment in which an intervention’s components are varied, the mediating mechanisms and outcome are measured, and then an analysis is performed to investigate an intervention’s causal story. To illustrate the procedures, a case study examines an intervention guided by the model of stigma communication (MSC; Smith, Commun. Theory 17:462–485, 2007; Stigma communication and health. In T. L. Thompson, R. Parrott, & J. Nussbaum (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 455–468). London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 2011; Commun. Monogr. 79:522–538, 2012). In the case study, we show how to conduct a mediation analysis when four components of an intervention have been manipulated in a 24 factorial experiment (N = 299), and, in addition, four hypothesized mediators have been measured. We reflect on how the results provide more precise conclusions about the theory guiding the intervention and opportunities for refinement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This story assumes that the intervention’s outcome can change. For example, if an intervention’s goal is to improve how often people wash their hands, then handwashing rates must be able to change.
References
Baranowski, T., Anderson, C., & Carmack, C. (1998). Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: How are we doing? How might we do better? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15, 266–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00080-4
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Retrieved March 31, 2015, from http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/index.html
Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cheung, E. Y. L. (2015). An outbreak of fear, rumours and stigma: Psychosocial support for the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa. Intervention, 13, 70–76.
Cho, H., & Salmon, C. T. (2007). Unintended effects of health communication campaigns. Journal of Communication, 57, 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00344.x
Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146
Collins, L. M. (2018). Conceptual introduction to the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). In L. M. Collins & K. C. Kugler (Eds.), Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: Advanced topics. New York, NY: Springer.
Collins, L. M., Dziak, J. R., & Li, R. (2009). Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: A resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. Psychological Methods, 14, 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015826
Corrigan, P. W., Powell, K. J., & Michaels, P. J. (2013). The effects of news stories on the stigma of mental illness. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0b013e3182848c24
Deaux, K., Reid, A., Mizrahi, K., & Ethier, K. A. (1995). Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.280
DeTurck, M. A. (2002). Persuasive effects of product warning labels. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), Persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 213–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
Eichelberger, L. (2007). SARS and New York’s Chinatown: The politics of risk and blame during an epidemic of fear. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1284–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.022
Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(86)90024-1
Frable, D. E. (1993). Dimensions of marginality: Distinctions among those who are different. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293194002
Glanz, K., & Bishop, D. B. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Haidt, J., McCauley, C. R., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7
Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2013). Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 813–821. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069
Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24, 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
Jaccard, J., & Jaccoby, J. (2010). Theory construction and model building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363
Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2014). Stigma and social inequality. In J. D. McLeod, E. Lawler, & M. Schwalbe (Eds.), Handbook of the social psychology of inequality (pp. 49–64). Dordrech, The Netherlands: Springer.
Lipsey, M. W. (1993). Theory as method: Small theories of treatments. In L. B. Sechrest & A. G. Scott (Eds.), Understanding causes and generalizing about them (pp. 5–38). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
MacKinnon, D. P., & Pirlott, A. G. (2015). Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 30–43.
MacKinnon, D. P., Taborga, M. P., & Morgan-Lopez, A. A. (2002). Mediation designs for tobacco prevention research. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 68, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00216-8
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2011). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Behavioral Research, 44, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
Maydeu-Olivares, A., Coffman, D. L., & Hartmann, W. M. (2007). Asymptotically distribution-free interval estimation for coefficient alpha. Psychological Methods, 12, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.157
Michie, S., & Abraham, C. (2004). Interventions to change health behaviours: Evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychology & Health, 19, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044031000141199
Miller, C. T., & Major, B. (2000). Coping with stigma and prejudice. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 243–272). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
Musso, D., Roche, C., Robin, E., Nhan, T., Teissier, A., & Cao-Lormeau, V. M. (2015). Potential sexual transmission of Zika virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 21, 359–361. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2102.141363
Noar, S. M. (2007). An interventionist’s guide to AIDS behavioral theories. AIDS Care, 19, 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120600708469
O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/13.3.251
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
Pescosolido, B. A., Martin, J. K., Lang, A., & Olafsdottir, S. (2008). Rethinking theoretical approaches to stigma: A framework integrating normative influences on stigma (FINIS). Social Science & Medicine, 67, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.018
Piper, M. E., Schlam, T. R., Fraser, D., Oguss, M., & Cook, J. W. (2018). Implementing factorial experiments in real-world settings: Lessons learned while engineering an optimized smoking cessation treatment. In L. M. Collins & K. C. Kugler (Eds.), Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: Advanced topics. New York, NY: Springer.
Pirlott, A. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38.
Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006, May). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
Roberto, A. J. (2013). Editor’s note for the extended parallel process model: Two decades later. Health Communication, 28, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.743748
Shen, L. J. (2016). Putting the fear back again (and within individuals): Revisiting the role of fear in persuasion. Health Communication. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1220043
Smith, R. A. (2007). Language of the lost: An explication of stigma communication. Communication Theory, 17, 462–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00307.x
Smith, R. A. (2011). Stigma communication and health. In T. L. Thompson, R. Parrott, & J. Nussbaum (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 455–468). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Smith, R. A. (2012). An experimental test of stigma communication features with a hypothetical infectious disease alert. Communication Monographs, 79, 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.723811
Smith, R. A., Levine, T. R., Lachlan, K. A., & Fediuk, T. K. (2002). The high cost of complexity in experimental design and data analysis: Type 1 and Type II error rates in multi-way ANOVA. Human Communication Research, 28, 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00821.x
So, J., Kim, S., & Cohen, H. (2017). Message fatigue: Conceptual definition, operationalization, and correlates. Communication Monographs, 84, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1250429
Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative judgement in social perception. British Journal of Psychology, 50, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1959.tb00677.x
VanderWeele, T. J. (2009). On the distinction between interaction and effect modification. Epidemiology, 20, 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181ba333c
VanderWeele, T. J., & Vansteelandt, S. (2014). Mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Epidemiologic Methods, 2, 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2012-0010
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59, 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
World Health Organization. (2014). Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Acknowledgments
Our thanks go to John Dziak, two anonymous reviewers, and researchers at the Methodology Center for feedback on earlier drafts. This project was supported by several National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards: R21 HG007111 from the National Human Genome Research Institute, P50 DA010075 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, P50 CA143188 from the National Cancer Institute, and R01 DK097364 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or its institutes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, R.A., Coffman, D.L., Zhu, X. (2018). Investigating an Intervention’s Causal Story: Mediation Analysis Using a Factorial Experiment and Multiple Mediators. In: Collins, L., Kugler, K. (eds) Optimization of Behavioral, Biobehavioral, and Biomedical Interventions. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91776-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91776-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91775-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91776-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)