Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 252 Accesses

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

Abstract

This concluding chapter integrates the theoretical frameworks and empirical results from the previous chapters to present a summarized answer to the research question: In what ways have processes of state formation created new states? The result is a comprehensive model of state formation and democratization. The parts from the previous chapters create a chain of processes over time: a new state emerges from a path to independence that establishes an initial regime that has more or less democratic qualities that affect the probability of democratization in the new state. The chapter also emphasizes the contribution of the study to research on state formation and democratization but also identifies agenda with research questions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, D., Møller, J., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2014). The State-Democracy Nexus: Conceptual Distinctions, Theoretical Perspectives, and Comparative Approaches. Democratization, 21(5), 1203–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinks, D., & Coppedge, M. (2006). Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, D. R. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, G., & Ziblatt, D. (2010). The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond. Comparative Political Studies, 43(8), 931–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, B. (2011). Friends in High Places: International Politics and the Emergence of States from Secessionism. International Organization, 65(3), 433–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, B. (2014). Power Politics and State Formation in the Twentieth Century: The Dynamics of Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, K. G. (2014). Inside the Politics of Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, G. K., & Sawyer, K. (2016). Is Self-Determination Contagious? A Spatial Analysis of the Spread of Self-Determination Claims. International Organization, 71(3), 585–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1990). After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denk, T., & Lehtinen, S. (2016). Two Modes of Democratization: Transition and State-Formation. Quality & Quantity, 50(6), 2331–2346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenspleet, R. (2005). Democratic Transitions: Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazal, J. D. (2004). State Death in the International System. International Organization, 58(2), 311–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazal, J. D. (2011). State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. (1999). A Revised List of Independent States Since the Congress of Vienna. International Interactions, 25(4), 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (2006). Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization, 60(4), 911–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. D. (2016). Age of Secession: The International and Domestic Determinants of State Birth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. D., & Butcher, C. R. (2013). Introducing the International System(s) Dataset (ISD), 1816–2011. International Interactions, 39(5), 748–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, H. E. (2000). The Parade of Sovereignties: Testing Theories of Secession in the Soviet Setting. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1992). The Dynamics of Secession. Acta Sociologica, 35(2), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, S. (2014). Demokratins förutsättningar vid staters självständighet. En studie om politiska regimer i nybildade stater. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, S. (2017). Determinants of Initial Regimes: Comparative Analyses of the Conditions for Democratisation at the Time of Independence. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2001). Path Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 111–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2010). Colonialism and Postcolonial Development: Spanish American in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Schensul, D. (2006). Historical Context and Path Dependence. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis (pp. 454–471). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzuca, S., & Munck, G. L. (2014). State or Democracy First? Alternative Perspectives on the State-Democracy Nexus. Democratization, 21(5), 1221–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, J., Ward, M. D., Lofdahl, C. L., Cohen, J. S., Brown, D. S., Reilly, D., et al. (1998). The Diffusion of Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(4), 545–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soifer, H. D. (2012). The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures. Comparative Political Studies, 45(12), 1572–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorens, J. (2012). Secessionism: Identity, Interest, and Strategy. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H. (1991). Democratic Dominoes. Diffusion Approaches to the Spread of Democracy in the International System. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(2), 356–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H., & Lindborg, C. (2003). Democratic Dominoes Revisited. The Hazards of Government Transition, 1975–1996. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4), 490–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wejnert, B. (2005). Diffusion, Development, and Democracy, 1800–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 53–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wejnert, B. (2014). Diffusion of Democracy: The Past and Future of Global Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. R. (1981). Secession: A Comparative Analytical Framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 14(1), 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Denk .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Denk, T., Lehtinen, S. (2019). Conclusion. In: State-Formation and Democratization. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91749-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics