Advertisement

Lessons Learned: Engaging Older Adults in Generative Design Sessions for a Digital Messaging System

  • Abena EdugyanEmail author
  • Andreas Papallas
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10924)

Abstract

The global population continues to age within an increasingly digitally connected society. Because of the ubiquity of technology, the needs, experiences and values of older adults should be considered to ensure they are not excluded from any advantages the digital society may provide. Engaging in generative design research allows users to collaborate with designers to uncover those needs as well as discover creative solutions to design problems. This paper explores the results of three generative design sessions conducted with older adults to gain insight into the feasibility of a digital messaging system designed to foster their inclusion in the digital society. Immersion and card sort sessions revealed the value placed in face-to-face communication with peers, while the card sort and brainstorm sessions highlighted health as a possible theme to be further explored. Additionally, the brainstorm session concluded with the creation of a rudimentary prototype, reinforcing the creativity older adults can bring to the design process. While the feedback generated from the sessions may not have supported the initial idea, they showed that the contribution of older adults in the design research process should not be understated.

Keywords

Generative design Older adults Digital society 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants, who generously volunteered their time to share their thoughts, perceptions and creativity.

References

  1. 1.
    Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. BIS Publisher, Amsterdam (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pew Research Center: Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults, May 2017Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Das, A., Bøthun, S., Reitan, J., Dahl, Y.: The use of generative techniques in co-design of mhealth technology and healthcare services for COPD patients. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2015, Part III. LNCS, vol. 9188, pp. 587–595. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20889-3_54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gatsou, C.: From inexperienced users to co-creators: an exploration of a generative method. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8520, pp. 244–252. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07638-6_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G., Olivier, P.: Engaging older people using participatory design. In: CHI 2012 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1199–1208. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidson, J.L., Jensen, C.: Participatory design with older adults: An analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, Sidney, Australia, pp. 1199–1208. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kristensson, P., Magnusson, P.R.: Tuning users’ innovativeness during ideation. Creat. Innov. Manag. 19(2), 147–159 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00552.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durick, J., Robertson, T., Brereton, M., Vetere, F., Nansen, B.: Dispelling ageing myths in technology design. In: Shen, H., Smith, R., Paay, J., Calder, P., Wyeld, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration - OzCHI 2013, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 467–476. ACM Press (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pew Research Center: Emerging Nations Embrace Internet, Mobile Technology, February 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis, J.E., Neider, M.B.: Designing wearable technology for an aging population. Ergon. Des. 25(3), 4–10 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804616645488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Satariano, W.A., Scharlach, A.E., Lindeman, D.: Aging, place, and technology: toward improving access and wellness in older populations. J. Aging Health 26(8), 1373–1389 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314543470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Juárez, M.R., González, V.M., Favela, J.: Effect of technology on aging perception. Health Inform. J. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216661863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    IDEO Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. http://www.designkit.org/resources/1. Accessed 07 Jan 2018
  15. 15.
    Personal values card sort. https://casaa.unm.edu/inst/Personal%20Values%20Card%20Sort.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  16. 16.
    O’Cass, A.: An exploratory study of the influence of personal values on purchase decision & advertising involvement. In: Tidwell, P.M., Muller, T.E. (eds.) AP - Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, pp. 67–72. Association for Consumer Research, Provo (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peek, S.T.M., Wouters, E.J.M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R., Vrijhoef, H.J.M.: Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83, 235–248 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers, Y., Marsden, G.: Does he take sugar? Moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. Interactions 20, 48–57 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2486227.2486238CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abena Edugyan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreas Papallas
    • 1
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
    • 1
  1. 1.Cyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus

Personalised recommendations