Advertisement

Conclusion: Rethinking the Value of Democracy

  • Renske DoorenspleetEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy book series (PSTCD)

Abstract

My book showed that there has been no consensus in the quantitative literature on the instrumental value of democracy. Some scholars claim there is a consensus, but they only do so by ignoring the huge amount of studies which rejects their own point of view. After undertaking a large-scale analysis of hundreds of articles published on the topic, this concluding chapter argues that the connections between democracy and expected outcomes are not as strong as they seem. This conclusion has implications for future research. First, we need to rethink the concept of democracy, as well as the measurements as used in statistical analyses; different solutions are proposed. Second, we need to rethink the boundaries within the discipline of political science, particularly between empirical studies of democracy on the one hand, and normative political theory on the other hand. Third, we need to rethink—and break down—the boundaries between disciplines. Results around the value of democracy have been dispersed over the disciplines of political science, comparative politics and IR, economics, sociology and development studies. Different disciplines focused on the same conventional questions in a strikingly similar way while providing different insights. Finally, we need to rethink the choice to focus on instrumental values in comparative research. Intrinsic and constructive values of democracy deserve our attentionas well, while it is also recommended to investigate whether democracy is working better with regard to other outcomes (e.g. health, education, socio-economic equality and access to clean water). This chapter gives ideas how to make (the study of) the value of democracy valuable again.

References

  1. Ake, C. (1991). Re-thinking Democracy in Africa. Journal of Democracy, 2(1), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1951/2017). The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: Penguin Classics. Google Scholar
  3. Arezki, R., & Gylfason, T. (2013). Resource Rents, Democracy, Corruption and Conflict: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 22(4), 552–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. A. (2015). The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bergh, G., Menocal, A. R., & Takeuchi, L. R. (2014). What’s Behind the Demand for Governance? An Assessment of People’s Views (ODI Report). London. See https://www.odi.org/publications/8251-whats-behind-demand-governance-assessment-peoples-views.
  6. Chenoweth, E. (2010). Democratic Competition and Terrorist Activity. The Journal of Politics, 72(1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chenoweth, E. (2013). Terrorism and Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppedge, M. J., Gerring, D., Altman, M., Bernhard, S., Fish, A., Hicken, M., et al. (2011). Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crozier, M. J., Huntington, S. P., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Doorenspleet, R. (2012). Critical Citizens, Democratic Support and Satisfaction in African Democracies. International Political Science Review, 33(3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doorenspleet, R. (2015). Where Are the People? A Call for People-Centered Concepts and Measurements of Democracy. Government and Opposition, 50(3), 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Flinders, M. V. (2012). Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fukuyama, F. (2014, June 6). At the “End of History” Still Stands Democracy: Twenty-Five Years After Tiananmen Square and the Berlin Wall’s Fall, Liberal Democracy Still Has No Real Competitors. The Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  17. Geißel, B. (2016). Should Participatory Opportunities Be a Component of Democratic Quality? The Role of Citizen Views in Resolving a Conceptual Controversy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 656–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldsmith, A. A. (2015). Elections and Civil Violence in New Multiparty Regimes Evidence from Africa. Journal of Peace Research, 52(5), 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halperin, M. H., Siegle, J. T., & Weinstein, M. M. (2004). The Democracy Advantage. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Huber, E., Rueschemeyer, D., & Stephens, J. D. (1997). The Paradoxes of Contemporary Democracy: Formal, Participatory, and Social Dimensions. Comparative Politics, 29(3), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lagerspetz, E. (2010). Wisdom and Numbers. Social Science Information, 49(1), 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Q. (2005). Does Democracy Promote or Reduce Transnational Terrorist Incidents? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy, Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lippmann, W. (1922/2007). Public Opinion. Sioux Falls, SD: NuVision Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Logan, C., & Mattes, R. (2012). Democratising the Measurement of Democratic Quality: Public Attitude Data and the Evaluation of African Political Regimes. European Political Science, 11(4), 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luce, E. (2017). The Retreat of Western Liberalism. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  30. Mair, P. (2006). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. New Left Review, 42, 25–51.Google Scholar
  31. Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  32. Mansbridge, J. J., & Parkinson, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Menocal, A. R., Bergh, G., & Rodriguez-Tkeuchi, L. (2014). Studies Show: People Want Democracy to Deliver the Goods. Foreign Policy. See http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/03/11/studies-show-people-want-democracy-to-deliver-the-goods/.
  34. Mozaffari, M. (2017). Islamism: A New Totalitarianism. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficits: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pateman, C. (1976). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Runciman, D. (2018). How Democracy Ends. London, UK: Profile Books. Google Scholar
  39. Schiavenza, M. (2017). Could China’s System Replace Democracy? in Asia Society, see https://asiasociety.org/blog/asia/could-chinas-system-replace-democracy.
  40. Schlesinger, A. M. (1945). The Age of Jackson (1953 ed.). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  41. Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What Democracy Is… and Is Not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942, Original Publication Reprinted in 1975). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  43. Selway, J., & Templeman, K. (2012). The Myth of Consociationalism? Conflict Reduction in Divided Societies. Comparative Political Studies, 45(12), 1542–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sen, A. (1999). Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snyder, T. (2017). On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  46. Sørensen, G. (1993). Democracy and Democratization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  47. Stanley, T., & Lee, A. (2014, September 1). It’s Still Not the End of History. The Atlantic. See http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/09/its-still-not-the-end-of-history-francis-fukuyama/379394/.
  48. Stoker, G. (2006). Why Politics Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  49. Stoker, G. (2011). Antipolitics in Britain: Dimensions, Causes and Responses. In T. Hermann (Ed.), By the People, For the People, Without the People? The Emergence of (Anti)Political Sentiment in Israel and in Western Democracies (pp. 119–144). Jerusalem: IDI Press.Google Scholar
  50. Van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  51. Van Wessel, M. (2010). Political Dissatisfaction: What We Can Learn from Asking the People. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(3), 504–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Wessel, M. (2016). Citizens as Sense-Makers: Towards a Deeper Appreciation of Citizens Understandings of Democratic Politics. Political Studies, 65(1), 127–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics and International StudiesUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations