Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavioral Operations in Multi-agent Settings and Humanitarian Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision-making in Humanitarian Operations

Abstract

Supply chain systems are characterized by complex interaction of multiple actors within an environment that allows both continuous communication and easy tracking of goods. Behavioral studies in operations management have focused on understanding the decision-making processes that explain subjects’ behaviors. These studies have shown how subjects’ decisions lead to inefficiencies and instabilities, and they have provided mechanisms to reduce such biases. However, decision-makers’ behavior and potential improvement mechanisms have not been extended to the humanitarian context. In humanitarian operations, organizations face multiple operational and strategic challenges because the performance of the system is strongly conditioned by the behavior of decision-makers and their interactions with other agents. This chapter provides an initial approach to extend traditional behavioral results to the humanitarian sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acimovic, J., & Goentzel, J. (2016). Models and metrics to assess humanitarian response capacity. Journal of Operations Management, 45, 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, T. K., Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (2011). Reprint of: A common-pool resource experiment with postgraduate subjects from 41 countries. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1580–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armony, M., & Plambeck, E. L. (2005). The impact of duplicate orders on demand estimation and capacity investment. Management Science, 51(10), 1505–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axsäter, S. (2003). A new decision rule for lateral transshipments in inventory systems. Management Science, 49(9), 1168–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Peth, M., Katok, E., & Thonemann, U. W. (2013). Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Science, 59(8), 1800–1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besiou, M., Stapleton, O., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2010). Exploring the known and the unknown: Future possibilities of system dynamics for humanitarian operations. Fontainebleau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., Hasija, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2014). Designing efficient infrastructural investment and asset transfer mechanisms in humanitarian supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 23(9), 1511–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E., & Katok, E. (2008). Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(3), 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostian, A. A., Holt, C. A., & Smith, A. M. (2008). Newsvendor “Pull-to-Center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 590–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P., Graves, S. C., & Kok, A. G. D. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 11, 227–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P., & Olivares, M. (2009). Competing retailers and inventory: An empirical investigation of General Motors’ dealerships in isolated U.S. markets. Management Science, 55(9), 1586–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenas, J. C. (2000). How do groups solve local commons dilemmas? Lessons from experimental economics in the field. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2(3–4), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, D., & Saysel, A. K. (2005). Simulation of common pool resource field experiments: A behavioral model of collective action. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 420–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, A., Lauras, M., van Wassenhove, L. N., & Dupont, L. (2016). Designing an efficient humanitarian supply network. Journal of Operations Management, 48, 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., & Lee, H. L. (2011). Bullwhip effect measurement and its implications. Operations Research, 60(4), 771–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Donohue, K. (2005). Upstream versus downstream information and its impact on the bullwhip effect. System Dynamics Review, 21(3), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., Donohue, K., Katok, E., & Sterman, J. D. (2014). Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production and Operations Management, 23(2), 176–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Ren, Y. (2013). Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Science, 59(11), 2502–2517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. M., Katok, E., & Santamaría, N. (2014). Push, pull, or both? A behavioral study of how the allocation of inventory risk affects channel efficiency. Management Science, 60(11), 2666–2683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, E., & Sterman, J. D. (1995). Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., & Rudi, N. (2004). Who benefits from transshipment? Exogenous vs. endogenous wholesale prices. Management Science, 50(5), 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, K. L., & Croson, R. (2002). Experimental economics management supply-chain. Interfaces, 32(5), 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1980). On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. Simulation Games, 11(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgement and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 53–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergun, O., Karakus, G., Keskinocak, P., Swann, J., & Villarreal, M. (2010). Operations research to improve disaster supply chain management. In Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, P., & Villa, S. (2016). Implications of misperception of feedback on behavior in operations. In M. Kunc, J. Malpass, & L. White (Eds.), Behavioural operational research: Theory, methodology and practice. London, UK: Palgrave Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halachmi, A. (2002). Performance measurement and government productivity. Work Study, 51(2), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herer, Y. T., Tzur, M., & Yücesan, E. (2006). The multi-location transshipment problem. IIE Transactions, 38(3), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T. H., Lim, N., & Cui, T. H. (2010). Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Science, 56(11), 1891–1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-veras, J., Jaller, M., Wassenhove, L. N. Van, Pérez, N., & Wachtendorf, T. (2012). On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7–8), 494–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Duenyas, I., & Kapuscinski, R. (2007). Existence of coordinating transshipment prices in a two-location inventory model. Management Science, 53(8), 1289–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaatrud, D. B., Samii, R., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). UN joint logistics centre: A coordinated response to common humanitarian logistics concerns. Forced Migration Review, 18(1), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(3), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katok, E., & Wu, D. Y. (2009). Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Science, 55(12), 1953–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, R. C. (1987). Anatomy of disaster relief: The international network in action. London, UK: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Thomas, J. B. (1987). The value of action and inference in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(3), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, M., & Porteus, E. L. (2001). Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(4), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G., & Locke, E. (1991). Self-regulation through goal-setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 50, 212–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997a). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997b). The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Review, 38(3), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiras, A., de Brito, I., Jr., Queiroz, E., Rejane, T., & Yoshida, H. T. (2014). Literature review of humanitarian logistics research: Trends and challenges. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4(1), 95–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessmann, C., & Markwardt, G. (2016). Aid, growth, and devolution: Considering aid modality and different types of decentralization. World Development, 84, 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, M., & Bryant, C. (2001). Going global: Transforming relief and development NGOs. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S. A., & McCardle, K. F. (1997). The competitive newsboy. Operations Research, 45, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netessine, S., Rudi, N., & Wang, Y. (2001). Dynamic inventory competition and customer retention. Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnenkamp, P., Öhler, H., & Sosa Andrés, M. (2017). Need, merit and politics in multilateral aid allocation: A district-level analysis of World Bank projects in India. Review of Development Economics, 21(1), 126–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oloruntoba, R., & Gray, R. (2006). Humanitarian aid: An agile supply chain? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(2), 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action (p. 271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov, A., Moritz, B., & Quiroga, B. F. (2015). How to compete against a behavioral newsvendor. Production and Operations Management, 24(11), 1783–1793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedraza-Martinez, A. J., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2012). Transportation and vehicle fleet management in humanitarian logistics: Challenges for future research. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 1, 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudi, N., Kapur, S., & Pyke, D. F. (2001). A two-location inventory with transshipment and a local decision making. Management Science, 47(12), 1668–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaranarayanan, K., Castañeda, J. A., & Villa, S. (2017). Future research in humanitarian operations: A behavioral operations perspective. In G. Kovács, K. Spens, & M. Moshtari (Eds.), Handbook of humanitarian logistics and supply chain management. London, UK: Palgrave Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M. E., & Cachon, G. P. (2000). Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Science, 46(3), 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sošić, G. (2006). Transshipment of inventories among retailers: Myopic versus farsighted stability. Management Science, 52(10), 1493–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M. K., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2014). Introduction to the special issue on humanitarian operations and crisis management. Production and Operations Management, 23(6), 925–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, J. M., Pedraza-Martinez, A. J., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Temporary hubs for the global vehicle supply chain in humanitarian operations. Production and Operations Management, 25(2), 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, M., Jr. (2005). Making humanitarian relief networks more effective: Operational coordination, trust and sense making. Disasters, 29(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, M., Jr., & Schnitzer, M. H. (2006). Interorganizational trust, boundary spanning, and humanitarian relief coordination. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (1989a). Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(3), 301–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (1989b). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science, 35(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Chicago, IL: Irwin-McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D., & Dogan, G. (2015). “I’m not hoarding, I’m just stocking up before the hoarders get here.” Behavioral causes of phantom ordering in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 39–40(C), 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasini, R., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). Humanitarian logistics (Vol. 20, 1st ed.). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrea, G., Villa, S., & Gonçalves, P. (2016). Exploratory analyses of relief and development operations using social networks. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 56, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrea, G., Villa, S., & Quintane, E. (2018). In need of aid: Accessing financial resources for humanitarian operations. Working paper, University of Los Andes.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(1), 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, S. (2018). Behavioral analysis of the effect of order duplications in single-supplier multi-retailer supply chains. Working paper, University of Los Andes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, S., & Castañeda, J. A. (2018). Transshipments in supply chains: A behavioral investigation. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(2), 715–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, S., Gonçalves, P., & Arango, S. (2015). Exploring retailers’ ordering decisions under delays. System Dynamics Review, 31(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, S., & Katok, E. (2018). Negotiating transfer prices for improving supply chain transshipments. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Xu, L., & Siemsen, E. (2016). A behavioral perspective on inventory sharing. Working paper, Wisconsin School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia

    Sebastián Villa

Authors
  1. Sebastián Villa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastián Villa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia

    Sebastián Villa

  2. Kelley School of Business Indiana University, Bloomington, USA

    Gloria Urrea

  3. School of Management Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia

    Jaime Andrés Castañeda

  4. Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Erik R. Larsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Villa, S. (2019). Behavioral Operations in Multi-agent Settings and Humanitarian Operations. In: Villa, S., Urrea, G., Castañeda, J.A., Larsen, E.R. (eds) Decision-making in Humanitarian Operations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91509-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation