Skip to main content

Abstract

Fuzzy systems have demonstrated a strong modeling capability. The quality of a fuzzy model is usually measured in terms of its accuracy and interpretability. While the way to measure accuracy is in most cases clear, measuring interpretability is still an open question.

The use of hierarchical structures in fuzzy modeling as a way to reduce complexity in systems with many input variables has also shown good results. This complexity reduction is usually considered as a way to improve interpretability, but the real effect of the hierarchy on interpretability has not really been analyzed.

The present paper analyzes that complexity reduction comparing it with that of other techniques such as feature extraction, to conclude that only the use of intermediate variables with meaning (from the point of view of model interpretation) will ensure a real interpretability improvement due to the hierarchical structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alhaddad, M., Mohammed, A., Kamel, M., Hagras, H.: A genetic interval type-2 fuzzy logic-based approach for generating interpretable linguistic models for the brain P300 phenomena recorded via brain–computer interfaces. Soft. Comput. 19(4), 1019–1035 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso, J.M., Magdalena, L., Guillaume, S.: HILK: a new methodology for designing highly interpretable linguistic knowledge bases using the fuzzy logic formalism. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(7), 761–794 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Babuska, R.: Fuzzy Modeling and Control. Kluwer, Norwell (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Cannone, R., Alonso, J.M., Magdalena, L.: Multi-objective design of highly interpretable fuzzy rule-based classifiers with semantic cointension. In: IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (IEEE-SSCI), IV International Workshop on Genetic and Evolutionary Fuzzy Systems (GEFS), Paris, pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Casillas, J., Cordon, O., Herrera, F., Magdalena, L.: Interpretability Issues in Fuzzy Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37057-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Casillas, J., Cordón, O., Herrera, F., Magdalena, L. (eds.): Accuracy Improvements in Linguistic Fuzzy Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37058-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cordón, O., Herrera, F., Zwir, I.: Linguistic modeling by hierarchical systems of linguistic rules. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10(1), 2–20 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gacto, M.J., Alcala, R., Herrera, F.: Interpretability of linguistic fuzzy rule-based systems: an overview of interpretability measures. Inf. Sci. 181(20), 4340–4360 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galende, M., Gacto, M., Sainz, G., Alcalá, R.: Comparison and design of interpretable linguistic vs. scatter FRBSs: Gm3m generalization and new rule meaning index for global assessment and local pseudo-linguistic representation. Inf. Sci. 282, 190–213 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Guillaume, S.: Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: an interpretability-oriented review. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9(3), 426–443 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guillaume, S., Charnomordic, B.: Generating an interpretable family of fuzzy partitions from data. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12(3), 324–335 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Raju, G.V.S., Zhou, J., Kisner, R.A.: Hierarchical fuzzy control. Int. J. Control 54(5), 1201–1216 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishibuchi, H., Nozaki, K., Yamamoto, N., Tanaka, H.: Selecting fuzzy if-then rules for classification problems using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 3(3), 260–270 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Juang, C.F., Chen, C.Y.: Data-driven interval type-2 neural fuzzy system with high learning accuracy and improved model interpretability. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 43(6), 1781–1795 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucas, L., Centeno, T., Delgado, M.: Towards interpretable general type-2 fuzzy classifiers. In: 9th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, ISDA 2009, pp. 584–589 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mar, J., Lin, H.T.: A car-following collision prevention control device based on the cascaded fuzzy inference system. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 150(3), 457–473 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mencar, C., Castiello, C., Cannone, R., Fanelli, A.: Interpretability assessment of fuzzy knowledge bases: a cointension based approach. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 52(4), 501–518 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nauck, D.: Measuring interpretability in rule-based classification systems. In: Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, pp. 196–201. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Razak, T., Garibaldi, J., Wagner, C., Pourabdollah, A., Soria, D.: Interpretability indices for hierarchical fuzzy systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, S., Chung, F., HongBin, S., Dewen, H.: Cascaded centralized tsk fuzzy system: universal approximator and high interpretation. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 5(2), 131–145 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yager, R.R.: On a hierarchical structure for fuzzy modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23(4), 1189–1197 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yager, R.R.: On the construction of hierarchical fuzzy systems models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 28(1), 55–66 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, Y., Ishibuchi, H., Wang, S.: Deep takagi-sugeno-kang fuzzy classifier with shared linguistic fuzzy rules. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (in Press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was partially supported by Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Magdalena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Magdalena, L. (2018). Do Hierarchical Fuzzy Systems Really Improve Interpretability?. In: Medina, J., et al. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations. IPMU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91472-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91473-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics