Disrupting the Rote Learning Loop: CS Majors Iterating Over Learning Modules with an Adaptive Educational Hypermedia

  • Muhammad Mustafa HassanEmail author
  • Adnan N. Qureshi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10858)


The rote learning problem has plagued the education systems of developing world since long. To name a few, improperly designed assessments, teachers’ authority, rewarding verbatim answers, sheer class sizes, and individual learner differences are amongst the most notable mediators. The authors report on the design and development of an adaptive educational hypermedia, which disrupts the rote learning loop by hitting a few of the aforementioned reasons. The reported system provides a personalized learning experience to each learner, adapting on the basis of cognitive and learning styles. Further, the assessments are designed in a way that they loop each failed learning via variated paths, hence eliminating chances of rote learning. Moreover, the failed perturbations are traced back to the problematic domain segment for further knowledge acquisition. In-situ evaluations of the system with end-users (real students of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science) reveal a difference between control and experimental groups. The effect size is however moderate.


Rote learning Adaptive educational hypermedia AEH Contextualization Adaptor-innovator model Cognitive styles Learning styles ESL 



We would like to acknowledge the support and guidance of Prof. Ashraf Iqbal, Dean Faculty of IT, University of Central Punjab, Pakistan. We are also grateful to The Punjab Group, Pakistan, for funding this research.


  1. 1.
    Chin, C., Brown, D.E.: Learning in science: a comparison of deep and surface approaches. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 37(2), 109–138 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    She, H.-C.: Promoting students’ learning of air pressure concepts: the interrelationship of teacher approaches and student learning characteristics. J. Exp. Educ. 74(1), 29–51 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lithner, J.: Learning mathematics by creative or imitative reasoning. In: Cho, S. (ed.) Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, pp. 487–506. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mokhtar, A.A., Rawian, R.M., Yahaya, M.F., Abdullah, A., Mohamed, A.R.: Vocabulary learning strategies of adult ESL learners. Engl. Teach. 36, 133–145 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kılıç, D., Sağlam, N.: Students’ understanding of genetics concepts: the effect of reasoning ability and learning approaches. J. Biol. Educ. 48(2), 63–70 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lithner, J.: A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educ. Stud. Math. 67(3), 255–276 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hacieminoglu, E.: Elementary school students’ attitude toward science and related variables. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 11(2), 35–52 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pell, A.W., Iqbal, H.M., Sohail, S.: Introducing science experiments to rote-learning classes in Pakistani middle schools. Eval. Res. Educ. 23(3), 191–212 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sonawat, R., Kothari, M.: Rote learning and meaningful learning in mathematics: perspectives of primary school teachers and learning in children. Indian J. Posit. Psychol. 4(1), 49–54 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Safdar, M.: Meaningful learning and rote learning in physics: a comparative study in city Jhelum (Pakistan). Middle Eastern Afr. J. Educ. Res. 6, 60–77 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, L., Hmelo-Silver, C.E.: Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 46(9), 1023–1040 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacobson, M.J., Archodidou, A.: The design of hypermedia tools for learning: fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. J. Learn. Sci. 9(2), 145–199 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zydney, J.M., Grincewicz, A.: The use of video cases in a multimedia learning environment for facilitating high school students’ inquiry into a problem from varying perspectives. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 20(6), 715–728 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rum, S.N.M., Ismail, M.A.: Metacognitive support accelerates computer assisted learning for novice programmers. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20(3), 170–181 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kirton, M.: Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 61(5), 622–629 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hassan, M.M., Qureshi, A.N.: Situating adaptive educational hypermedia into the local context of developing nations. In: Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Communication and Information Systems (ICCIS 2017), Wuhan, China (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleming, N.D., Mills, C.: Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, Paper 246. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska, Lincoln (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saga, Z., Qamar, K., Trali, G.: Learning styles-understanding for learning strategies. Pak. Armed Forces Med. J. 65(5), 706–709 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ye, L., Lewis, S.E.: Looking for links: examining student responses in creative exercises for evidence of linking chemistry concepts. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15, 576–586 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Popham, W.J.: Why standardized tests don’t measure educational quality. Educ. Leadersh. 56(6), 8–15 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lix, L.M., Keselman, J.C., Keselman, H.J.: Consequences of assumption violations revisited: a quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance “F” Test. Rev. Educ. Res. 66(4), 579–619 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central PunjabLahorePakistan
  2. 2.University of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations