Skip to main content

Evaluating Review’s Quality Based on Review Content and Reviewer’s Expertise

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 960 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10829))

Abstract

User reviews, containing a wealth of user opinion information, play an important role for product’s online word of mouth, which have great reference value for potential customers and service/product providers. But the problem of information overload caused by the massive reviews makes users difficult to find high-quality reviews effectively. Most current methods of evaluating review quality focus on review’s content. However, the reviewer’s expertise also has a positive effect on evaluation of review’s quality. In this paper, we propose a new method to rank the reviews according to their quality. Firstly, reviewer’s quality of special topic is measured based on his/her historical review data with a topic model. Then, the coverage of attributes described in review content are integrated to measure the review’s quality based on a learning to rank model. A series of experiments are implemented on a real world dataset to verify the proposed method’s effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.amazon.com.

  2. 2.

    www.ebay.com.

References

  1. Kim, S.M., Pantel, P., Chklovski, T., Pennacchiotti, M.: Automatically assessing review helpfulness, pp. 423–430 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, Y., Huang, X., An, A., Yu, X.: Modeling and predicting the helpfulness of online reviews, pp. 443–452 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hong, Y., Lu, J., Yao, J., Zhu, Q., Zhou, G.: What reviews are satisfactory: novel features for automatic helpfulness voting, pp. 495–504 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, Y., Qiu, M., Yan, Y., Bao, F.S.: Semantic analysis and helpfulness prediction of text for online product reviews, vol. 2, pp. 38–44, January 2015

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu, Y., Tsaparas, P., Ntoulas, A., Polanyi, L.: Exploiting social context for review quality prediction, pp. 691–700 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tang, J., Gao, H., Hu, X., Liu, H.: Context-aware review helpfulness rating prediction, pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, Y., Lei, T., Zhou, T.: A robust ranking algorithm to spamming. EPL 94(4), 1034–1054 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, B., Li, R.H., King, I., Lyu, M.R., Yu, J.X.: A topic-biased user reputation model in rating systems. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 44(3), 581–607 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, L., Qiu, M., Gottipati, S., Zhu, F., Jiang, J.: Cqarank: jointly model topics and expertise in community question answering, pp. 99–108 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, R., Mcauley, J.: Ups and downs: modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering, pp. 507–517 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cao, Z., Qin, T., Liu, T.Y., Tsai, M.F., Li, H.: Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach, pp. 129–136 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, R., Gao, M., He, X., Zhou, A.: Learning user credibility for product ranking. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 46(3), 679–705 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61562014, U1501252, U1711263), the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (No. 2015GXNSFAA139303), the project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software, the project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Automatic Detecting Technology and Instruments (No. YQ17111), the general Scientific Research Project of Guangxi Provincial Department of Education (No. 2017KY0195).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuming Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, J., Lin, Y., Huang, T., Li, Y. (2018). Evaluating Review’s Quality Based on Review Content and Reviewer’s Expertise. In: Liu, C., Zou, L., Li, J. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10829. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91455-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91455-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91454-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91455-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics