Advertisement

Tracking Dynamic Magnet Communities: Insights from a Network Perspective

  • Chang Liao
  • Yun Xiong
  • Xiangnan Kong
  • Yangyong Zhu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10827)

Abstract

Communities, such as user groups, companies and countries, are important objects in social systems. Recently, researchers have proposed numerous quantitative indicators to measure the attractiveness of a community. However, most of these indicators are mainly under static settings and lack the predictive power of future impact/attractiveness. Meanwhile, in many real-world applications, especially in finance, it is of great interest for the stakeholders to identify the communities, not necessarily the most influential ones at the moment, but the future leaders for years to come. Given the increasing availability of entity-community interaction evolution records, it’s natural to exploit them to model the network changes of communities. We refer the change of community interaction as attention flow and define communities that will sustainably attract more entities’ attentions than others in a future time interval as dynamic magnet communities. We study the problem of dynamic magnet community identification based on entity-community interaction evolution records. Two major challenges are identified as follows: (1) temporal dynamics, it’s difficult to model the rising-declining trend of interactions; (2) sustainability constraints, the effect of attention flow on community prosperity is complex, where too rapid attention growth increases the corruption risks. In response, we propose to model the interaction network evolution of different communities over time by lasso based growth curve fitting. Taking sustainable attention flow into account, we measure attention flow utility from benefit and risk perspectives, and further present a hybrid approach of local and global ranking to track dynamic magnet communities. Due to the lack of dataset for testing, we collected a dataset of international business merger and acquisition network among different countries in the world. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed model.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Projects No. 91546105, No. U1636207, the Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund No. 16JC1400801, No.17511105502.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., Eckstein, J.: Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 3(1), 1–122 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cristelli, M., Gabrielli, A., Tacchella, A., Caldarelli, G., Pietronero, L.: Measuring the intangibles: a metrics for the economic complexity of countries and products. PLoS One 8(8), e70726 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Du, N., Jia, X., Gao, J., Gopalakrishnan, V., Zhang, A.: Tracking temporal community strength in dynamic networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27(11), 3125–3137 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hallac, D., Leskovec, J., Boyd, S.: Network lasso: clustering and optimization in large graphs. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 387–396 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Internetmap (2016). http://internet-map.net/
  6. 6.
    Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 20(4), 422–446 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koren, Y.: Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In: ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 447–456 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, J., Cheung, W.K., Liu, J., Li, C.: On discovering community trends in social networks. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technologies 2009, WI-IAT 2009, vol. 1, pp. 230–237 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, W., Deng, Z.H., Gong, X., Jiang, F., Tsang, I.W.: Effectively predicting whether and when a topic will become prevalent in a social network. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 210–216 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsuo, Y., Yamamoto, H.: Community gravity: measuring bidirectional effects by trust and rating on online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World wide web, pp. 751–760 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehmood, Y., Barbieri, N., Bonchi, F., Ukkonen, A.: CSI: community-level social influence analysis. In: Blockeel, H., Kersting, K., Nijssen, S., Železný, F. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8189, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40991-2_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Page, L.: The PageRank citation ranking : bringing order to the web, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–14 (1998). http://www-db.stanford.edu/?backrub/pageranksub.ps
  13. 13.
    Qiu, J., Li, Y., Tang, J., Lu, Z., Ye, H., Chen, B., Yang, Q., Hopcroft, J.E.: The lifecycle and cascade of wechat social messaging groups. In: International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 311–320 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ribeiro, B.: Modeling and predicting the growth and death of membership-based websites. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 653–664 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gleich, D.F., Rossi, R.A.: A dynamical system for PageRank with time-dependent teleportation. Internet Math. 10(1–2), 188–217 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ryu, J., Byeon, S.C.: Technology level evaluation methodology based on the technology growth curve. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78(6), 1049–1059 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saez-Trumper, D., Comarela, G., Almeida, V., Baeza-Yates, R., Benevenuto, F.: Finding trendsetters in information networks. In: ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1014–1022 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., Barabási, A.L.: Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science 354(6312), aaf5239 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun, J., Tang, J.: A survey of models and algorithms for social influence analysis. In: Aggarwal, C. (ed.) Social Network Data Analytics, pp. 177–214. Springer, Boston (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8462-3_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., Pietronero, L.: A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity. Sci. Rep. 2, 723 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tumminello, M., Miccichè, S., Lillo, F., Varho, J., Piilo, J., Mantegna, R.N.: Community characterization of heterogeneous complex systems. J. Stat. Mech Theory Exp. 2011(01), P01019 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Von Rosen, D.: The growth curve model: a review. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 20(9), 2791–2822 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, D., Barabsi, A.L.: Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342(6154), 127–32 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang, G., Zhao, Y., Shi, X., Yu, P.S.: Magnet community identification on social networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 588–596 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, S., Xie, S., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Yu, P.S., Shu, X.: Future influence ranking of scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 749–757. SIAM (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wei, W., Gao, B., Liu, T.Y., Wang, T.: A ranking approach on large-scale graph with multidimensional heterogeneous information. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46(4), 930–944 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xu, Y., Hong, X., Peng, Z., Yang, G., Yu, P.S.: Temporal recommendation via modeling dynamic interests with inverted-U-curves. In: Navathe, S.B., Wu, W., Shekhar, S., Du, X., Wang, X.S., Xiong, H. (eds.) DASFAA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9642, pp. 313–329. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32025-0_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang, T., Cui, P., Faloutsos, C., Lu, Y., Ye, H., Zhu, W., Yang, S.: Come-and-go patterns of group evolution: a dynamic model. In: The ACM SIGKDD International Conference, pp. 1355–1364 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zheng, V.W., Zheng, V.W., Zhu, F., Chang, C.C., Huang, Z.: From community detection to community profiling. Proc. VLDB Endow. 10(7), 817–828 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang Liao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yun Xiong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiangnan Kong
    • 3
  • Yangyong Zhu
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Data Science, School of Computer ScienceFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Institute for Advanced Communication and Data ScienceFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Worcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations