Advertisement

Legitimating Bio-Economies

  • Kean Birch
Chapter

Abstract

While discourse provides one angle to analyse the development of bio-economies, it does not address the political-economic materialities of bio-based energy, products, and chemicals. The biophysical characteristics of these things both enable and limit the development of different bio-economies. This chapter analyses how certain forms of bio-economy are legitimated by their political-economic materialities. In the Canadian context, this has involved support for ‘drop-in’ biofuels, which are compatible with prevailing institutions, infrastructures, and value chains (e.g. combustion engine, automobiles, suburbia, etc.). Drop-in biofuels legitimate a particular form of the bio-economy that is politically popular because it need not entail a wholesale (and expensive) reconfiguration of societies and economies.

References

  1. Bailis, R., Baka, J. (2011) Constructing sustainable biofuels: Governance of the emerging biofuel economy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (4): 827–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, K. (2009) Commentary: Neoliberal nature, ecological fixes, and the pitfalls of comparative research, Environment and Planning A 41: 1781–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M. and van den Broek, R. (2003) The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: A review of 17 studies, Biomass and Bioenergy 25(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyer, D. (2011) Energopolitics and the anthropology of energy, Anthropology News 52(5): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boykoff, M. and Randalls, S. (2009) Theorizing the carbon economy: Introduction to the special issue, Environment and Planning A 41(10): 2299–2304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvert, K. and Simandan, D. (2010) Energy, space, and society: A reassessment of the changing landscape of energy production, distribution, and use, Journal of Economics and Business Research 16(1): 13–37.Google Scholar
  7. Calvert, K., Birch, K. and Mabee, W. (2017) New perspectives on an old energy resource: Biomass and emerging bio-economies, in S. Bouzarovski, M. Pasqualetti and V. Castan Broto (eds) The Routledge research companion to energy geographies, London: Routledge, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
  8. Canadian Renewable Fuels Association. (2011) Plant locations (ethanol), greenfuels.org, retrieved from: http://www.greenfuels.org/en/industry-information/plants.aspx.
  9. CanBio. (2012) Economic impact of bioenergy in Canada – 2011, Ottawa: Canadian Bioenergy Association, retrieved from: http://www.canbio.ca/upload/documents/canbio-bioenergydata-study-2011-jan-31a-2012.pdf.
  10. Castree, N. (2008a) Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A 40: 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castree, N. (2008b) Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations, Environment and Planning A 40: 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CEC. (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe [COM(2012) 60 Final], Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  13. Charles, M., Ryan, R., Ryan, N. and Oloruntoba, R. (2007) Public policy and biofuels: The way forward? Energy Policy 35(11): 5737–5746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charriere, A. (2009) Bioenergy policy and regulation in Canada, Ottawa: Regulatory Governance Initiative, Carleton University, retrieved from: http://www.regulatorygovernance.ca/publication/timeline-bioenergy-policy-and-regulation-in-canada/wppa_open/.
  15. ClientEarth. (2012) Carbon impacts of bioenergy under European and international rules. Brussels: ClientEarth.Google Scholar
  16. Dale, B. (2018) Time to rethink cellulosic biofuels? Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining 12(1): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dahmann, K., Fowler, L. and Smith, P. (2016) United States law and policy and the biofuel industry, in Y. Le Bouthillier, A. Cowie, P. Martin, and H. McLeod-Kilmurray (eds) The law and policy of biofuels, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 102–140.Google Scholar
  18. de Beer, J. (2011) Network governance of biofuels, Valgen Working Paper Series, retrieved from: http://jeremydebeer.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Network_Governance_of_Biofuels%20VALGEN%20Working%20Paper.pdf.
  19. Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S. and Hawthorne, P. (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt, Science 319: 1235–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferry, M., Hasty, J. and Cookson, N.A. (2012) Synthetic biology approaches to biofuel production, Biofuels 3(1): 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillon, S. (2010) Fields of dreams: Negotiating an ethanol agenda in the Midwest United States, Journal of Peasant Studies 37(4): 723–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giordano, M. (2003) The geography of the commons: The role of scale and space, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(2): 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein, J. and Tyfield, D. (2017) Green Keynesianism: Bringing the entrepreneurial state back in(to question)? Science as Culture https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1346598.
  24. Hamelinck, C., Suurs, R. and Faaij, A. (2005) International bioenergy transport costs and energy balance, Biomass and Bioenergy 29(2): 114–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harvey, M. and Pilgrim, S. (2011) The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change, Food Policy 36(1): 540–551.Google Scholar
  26. Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S. and Tiffany, D. (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels, PNAS 103(30): 11206–11210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huber, M. (2013) Lifeblood: Oil, freedom, and the forces of capital, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, B. (2012) Biomass power: Planning, technical issues, and economic drivers, presented at Biomass Power: Planning, Technical Issues, and Economic Drivers Conference, Toronto, Canada, 22–23 February.Google Scholar
  29. Kedron, P. and Bagchi-Sen, S. (2011) A study of the emerging renewable energy sector within Iowa, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(4): 882–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levidow, L., Birch, K. and Papaioannou, T. (2012a) EU agri-innovation policy: Two contending visions of the knowledge-based bio-economy, Critical Policy Studies 6(1): 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levidow, L., Papaioannou, T. and Birch, K. (2012b) Neoliberalising technoscience and environment: EU policy for competitive, sustainable biofuels, in L. Pellizzoni and M. Ylönen (eds) Neoliberalism and technoscience: Critical assessments, Farnham: Ashgate Publishers, 159–186.Google Scholar
  32. Levidow, L. and Papaioannou, T. (2014) UK biofuel policy: Envisaging sustainable biofuels, shaping institutions, Environment and Planning A 46(2): 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Londo, M. and Deurwaarder, E. (2007) Developments in EU biofuels policy related to sustainability issues: Overview and outlook, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1(4): 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mabee, W. (2013) Progress in the Canadian biorefining sector, Biofuels 4(4): 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mabee, W. and Mirck, J. (2011) A regional evaluation of potential bioenergy production pathways in eastern Ontario, Canada, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(4): 897–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCarthy, J. and Prudham, S. (2004) Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism, Geoforum 35: 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McMichael, P. (2009) The agrofuels project at large, Critical Sociology 35(6): 825–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McMichael, P. (2012) The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring, Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3–4): 681–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitchell, D. (2008) A note on rising food prices, Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitchell, T. (2009) Carbon democracy, Economy and Society 38(3): 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitchell, T. (2010) The resources of economics: Making the 1973 oil crisis, Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitchell, T. (2011) Carbon democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Mol, A. (2007) Boundless biofuels? Between environmental sustainability and vulnerability, Sociologia Ruralis 47(4): 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore, J.W. (2010) The end of the road? Agricultural revolutions in the capitalist world-ecology, 1450–2010, Journal of Agrarian Change 10(3): 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Connell, D. and Haritos, V. (2010) Conceptual investment framework for biofuels and biorefineries research and development, Biofuels 1(1): 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ontario Power Authority (OPA). (2010) Ontario’s long-term energy plan, Toronto: Ontario Power Authority.Google Scholar
  47. Pimentel, D. (2009) Biofuel food disasters and cellulosic ethanol problems, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 29(3): 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ponte, S. (2014a) The evolutionary dynamics of biofuel value chains: From unipolar and government-driven to multipolar governance, Environment and Planning A 46(2): 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ponte, S. (2014b) “Roundtabling” sustainability: Lessons from the biofuel industry, Geoforum 54: 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Power, M. (2016) Lessons from US biofuels policy: The renewable fuel Standard’s rocky ride, in Y. Le Bouthillier, A. Cowie, P. Martin, and H. McLeod-Kilmurray (eds) The law and policy of biofuels, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 141–163.Google Scholar
  51. Puddister, D., Dominy, S., Baker, J., Morris, D., Maure, J., Rice, J., Jones, T., Majumdar, I., Hazlett, P., Titus, B., Fleming, R. and Wetzel, S. (2011) Opportunities and challenges for Ontario’s forest bioeconomy, The Forestry Chronicle 87(4): 468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rapier, R. (2018) Cellulosic ethanol falling far short of the hype, forbes.com, 11 February, retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2018/02/11/cellulosic-ethanol-falling-far-short-of-the-hype/2/#3d0c613d6a6e
  53. Richard, T. (2010) Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure, Science 329: 793–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roff, R.J. (2008) Preempting to nothing: Neoliberalism and the fight to de/re-regulate agricultural biotechnology, Geoforum 39: 1423–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sampson, C., Agnew, J. and Wassermann, J. (2012) Logistics of agricultural-based biomass feedstock for Saskatchewan, Report prepared for ABC Steering Committee, SaskPower, NRCan. Project No. E7810.Google Scholar
  56. Savage, N. (2011) The ideal biofuel, Nature 474: S9–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schnepf, R. and Yacobucci, B. (2013) Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): Overview and issues, Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, retrieved from: https://www.ifdaonline.org/IFDA/media/IFDA/GR/CRS-RFS-Overview-Issues.pdf.
  58. Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D. and Yu, T.-H. (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change, Science 319: 1238–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sims, R., Mabee, W., Saddler, J. and Taylor, M. (2010) An overview of second generation biofuel technologies, Bioresource Technology 101(6): 1570–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, J. (2010) Biofuels and the globalization of risk, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  61. Stephen, J., Mabee, W. and Saddler, J. (2011) Will second-generation ethanol be able to compete with first-generation ethanol? Opportunities for cost reduction, Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining 6(2): 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyner, W. (2010a) Cellulosic biofuels market uncertainties and government policy, Biofuels 1(3): 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tyner, W. (2010b) Comparisons of the US and EU approaches to stimulating biofuels, Biofuels 1(1): 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tyner, W. (2010c) Why the push for drop-in biofuels? Biofuels 1(6): 813–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Upham, P., Shackley, S. and Waterman, H. (2007) Public and stakeholder perceptions of 2030 bioenergy scenarios for the Yorkshire and Humber region, Energy Policy 35(9): 4403–4412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Walker, G. and Cass, N. (2007) Carbon reduction, “the public” and renewable energy: Engaging with socio-technical configurations, Area 39(4): 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White House. (2012) National bioeconomy blueprint, Washington, DC: The White House.Google Scholar
  68. Wolf, D. (2012) Adjusting expectations of scale based on limitations of supply: A review of the case for a forest bioenergy strategy that prioritizes decentralization, efficiency, and integration, MSc Thesis in Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  69. Worldwatch Institute. (2007) Biofuels for transport, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  70. Yappa, R. (2012) Germany’s renewable powerhouse: City utilities spearhead switch to renewables, Renewable Energy World September–October 2012: 48–53.Google Scholar
  71. Zimmerer, K. (2011) New geographies of energy: Introduction to the special issue, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(4): 705–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kean Birch
    • 1
  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations