Advertisement

Bio-Economy Policy Visions

  • Kean Birch
Chapter

Abstract

A growing body of research outlines the important role played by policy visions, master narratives, imaginaries, and other discourses in the emergence of and support for different bio-economies around the world. In this chapter, I outline the different and competing policy visions in the Canadian bio-economy as a way to analyse the fragmented nature of the Canadian policy frameworks designed to support the enactment of the bio-economy. As such, I argue that these policy visions are not simply descriptive discourses, they are also generative or performative in that they direct policy attention, policy support, and policy funding towards particular conceptions of the bio-economy. Here, policy visions are frequently entwined with ‘neoliberal’ narratives about the benefits of markets, although the relationship between these narratives and visions of sustainable transitions often come into conflict with one another.

References

  1. Bauer, F. (2018) Narratives of biorefinery innovation for the bioeconomy – Conflict, consensus, or confusion? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.005.
  2. Birch, K. (2012) Knowledge, place, and power: Geographies of value in the bioeconomy, New Genetics and Society 31: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birch, K. (2016) Innovation, regional development and the life sciences: Beyond clusters, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Birch, K. and Calvert, K. (2015) Rethinking ‘drop-in’ biofuels: On the political materialities of bioenergy, Science and Technology Studies 28: 52–72.Google Scholar
  5. Birch, K. and Mykhnenko, V. (2014) Lisbonizing vs. financializing Europe? The Lisbon strategy and the (un-)making of the European knowledge-based economy, Environment and Planning C 32: 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birch, K., Levidow, L. and Papaioannou, T. (2010) Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of nature and knowledge in the European “knowledge-based bio-economy”, Sustainability 2: 2898–2918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birch, K., Levidow, L. and Papaioannou, T. (2014) Self-fulfilling prophecies of the European knowledge-based bio-economy: The discursive shaping of institutional and policy frameworks in the bio-pharmaceuticals sector, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BIOTECanada. (2009) The Canadian blueprint: Beyond moose & mountains. How we can build the world’s leading bio-based economy, Ottawa: BioteCanada.Google Scholar
  9. BIOTECanada. (2015) Becoming a world leading bioeconomy by 2025, Ottawa: BIOTECanada, retrieved from: http://www.biotecanada-ecosystem.com/home-4/.Google Scholar
  10. Blair, J. and Mabee, W. (2012) Policy and legislation to facilitate development of the bioeconomy in Canada, BIOFOR Conference, Thunder Bay, Canada, 14 May.Google Scholar
  11. Bridge, G. (2008) Environmental economic geography: A sympathetic critique, Geoforum 39 (1): 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bridge, G. (2009) Material worlds: Natural resources, resource geography and the material economy. Geography Compass 3 (3): 1217–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bugge, M., Hansen, T. and Klitkou, A. (2016) What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature, Sustainability 8: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CEC. (2005) New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy: Conference report, Brussels: DG-Research, Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  15. CEC. (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for europe [COM(2012) 60 Final], Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  16. Coenen, L., Moodysson, J. and Martin, H. (2015) Path renewal in old industrial regions: Possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy, Regional Studies 49 (5): 850–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CRFA. (2014) Evolution & growth: From biofuels to bioeconomy, Ottawa: Canadian Renewable Fuels Association.Google Scholar
  18. de Besi, M. and McCormick, K. (2015) Towards a bioeconomy in Europe: National, regional and industrial strategies, Sustainability 7: 10461–10478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. El-Chickakli, B., von Braun, J., Lang, C., Barben, D. and Philp, J. (2016) Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy, Nature 535: 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Felt, U. (rapporteur) (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously, Luxembourg: Office of the Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  21. FPAC. (2011) Bio-pathways report, Ottawa: Forest Products Association of Canada, retrieved from: http://www.fpac.ca/wp-content/uploads/BIOPATHWAYS-II-web.pdf.Google Scholar
  22. Frow, E., Ingram, D., Powell, W., Steer, D., Vogel, J. and Yearley, S. (2009) The politics of plants, Food Security 1 (1): 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geels, F. W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. German Bioeconomy Council. (2015a) Bioeconomy policy: Synopsis and analysis of strategies in the G7, Berlin: Office of the German Bioeconomy Council.Google Scholar
  25. German Bioeconomy Council. (2015b) Bioeconomy policy: Synopsis of national strategies around the world, Berlin: Office of the German Bioeconomy Council.Google Scholar
  26. Gillon, S. (2010) Fields of dreams: Negotiating an ethanol agenda in the Midwest United States, The Journal of Peasant Studies 37: 723–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gillon, S. (2014) Science in carbon economies: Debating what counts in US biofuel governance, Environment and Planning A 46: 318–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hilgartner, S. (2007) Making the bioeconomy measurable: Politics of an emerging anticipatory machinery, BioSocieties 2: 382–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jasanoff, S. (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S.-H. (2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the U.S. and South Korea, Minerva 47: 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jessop, B. (2005) Cultural political economy: The knowledge-based economy and the state, in A. Barry and D. Slater (eds) The technological economy, London: Routledge, pp. 144–166.Google Scholar
  32. Kitchen, L. and Marsden, T. (2011) Constructing sustainable communities: A theoretical exploration of the bio-economy and eco-economy paradigms, Local Environment 16: 753–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levidow, L., Birch, K. and Papaioannou, T. (2013) Divergent paradigms of European agro-food innovation: The knowledge-based bio-economy (KBBE) as an R&D agenda, Science, Technology, and Human Values 38: 94–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levidow, L., Birch, K. and Papaioannou, T. (2012) EU agri-innovation policy: Two contending visions of the knowledge-based bio-economy, Critical Policy Studies 6: 40–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mabee, W. (2011) Circular economies and Canada’s forest sector; Work in a Warming World Working Paper #2011–8, York University.Google Scholar
  36. Mathews, J.A. (2009) From the petroeconomy to the bioeconomy: Integrating bioenergy production with agricultural demands, Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining 3: 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCormick, K. (2014) The bioeconomy and beyond: Visions and strategies, Biofuels 5: 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCormick, K. and Kautto, N. (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview, Sustainability 5: 2589–2608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD. (2005) The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. (2006) The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  41. OECD. (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda – Main findings and policy conclusions, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pfau, S.F., Hagens, J.E., Dankbaar, B. and Smits, A.J.M. (2014) Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research, Sustainability 6: 1222–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ponte, S. and Birch, K. (2014) Introduction: Imaginaries and governance of biofueled futures, Environment and Planning A 46: 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson, B. (2012) From a fossil-fuel to a biobased economy: The politics of industrial biotechnology, Environment and Planning C 30: 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmid, O., Padel, S. and Levidow, L.(2012) The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective, Bio-based and Applied Economics 1: 47–63.Google Scholar
  46. Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, RA., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D. and Yu, TH. (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change, Science 319 (5867): 1238–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smolker, R. (2008) The new bioeconomy and the future of agriculture, Development 51: 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soyez, D., Schulz, C. (2008) Facets of an emerging Environmental Economic Geography (EEG), Geoforum 39 (1): 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M. and McCormick, K. (2013) Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches, Sustainability 5: 2751–2769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. The White House. (2012) National bioeconomy blueprint, Washington, DC: The White House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kean Birch
    • 1
  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations