Skip to main content

EU Rule of Law Conditionality: Democracy or ‘Stabilitocracy’ Promotion in the Western Balkans?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans

Part of the book series: New Perspectives on South-East Europe ((NPSE))

Abstract

This chapter investigates persistence of limitations to rule of law reforms in the Western Balkan EU candidate countries. Contrary to initial hopes that the ongoing approximation of the Western Balkans to the EU will gradually introduce the liberal democratic form of government, based on the rule of law, to the six non-EU Western Balkan nations, serious backsliding in terms of democracy and the rule of law can be observed throughout the region over the past decade. By looking closely into case studies of Serbia and Macedonia this chapter offers a fuller picture on why does Europeanisation by rule of law promotion trigger rather surface-thin reforms across the Western Balkan aspiring Member States. Converging the set of newly adopted laws and features of the crisis of democracy and rule of law over the past five years, research suggests that, despite constitutional guarantees and the adoption of relevant legislation, rule of law in the region still remains deficient owing to shortfalls in norm implementation, the obstructing role of ‘gate-keeping’ elites and the absence of internal agents of change and lack of EU’s standards in the field of rule of law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information: “Interactive Overview of Macedonia’s Largest Wire-Tapping Scandal”, Al Jazeera. Available at: http://interactive.aljazeera.com/ajb/2015/makedonija-bombe/eng/index.html.

  2. 2.

    For more information: “Interactive Overview of Macedonia’s Largest Wire-Tapping Scandal”, Al Jazeera. Available at: http://interactive.aljazeera.com/ajb/2015/makedonija-bombe/eng/index.html.

  3. 3.

    United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19, General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III).

  4. 4.

    “Serbian PM Slams EU, Alleging BIRN Lies,” Balkan Insight (10 January 2015).

References

  • Barlovac, B. 2015. Media Integrity Report: State-media Financial Relations in Serbia. Southeast European Media Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIRN. 2015. Hahn Demands Proof of Serbia Media Censorship (Belgrade, 17 Febrary). Available at: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/hahn-calls-for-evidence-on-media-censorship-in-serbia.

  • Carothers, T. (ed.). 2006. Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T. 2005. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59 (4): 801–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallara, C. 2014. Democracy and Judicial Reforms in South-East Europe. Springer: Bern.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, A., and D. Toshkov. 2009. Post-accession Compliance Between Administrative Co-ordination and Political Bargaining. Special Issue, European Integration online Papers 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrašinović, D. (ed.). 2016. Citizens’ Supervision of Media Privatization in Serbia. Prokuplje: Toplica Center for Democracy and Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragojlo, S. 2016. Serbian Progressives Taking Over Provincial Television Journalists Claim. Balkan Insight (18 May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbasani, A. (ed.). 2013. European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual? Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbasani, A., and S. Šelo Šabić. 2017. Rule of Law, Corruption and Democratic Accountability in the Course of EU Enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy 24: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2011. Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011–2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. COM(2011) 666 Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014a. Serbia 2014 Progress Report 2014. COM(2014) 700 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. Guidelines for EU Support to Media Freedom and Media Integrity in Enlargement Countries, 2014–2020. DG Enlargement.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Communication: A Credible Enlargement Perspective for and Enhanced EU Engagement with the Western Balkans. COM(2018) 65 Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament, DG External Policies, Policy Department. 2014. Freedom of the Media in the Western Balkans, EXPO/B/DROI/2013/16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2018. Freedom of the Press: Serbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev, S., and A. Đorđević́. 2014. Advertising as a Private Venture of the Government, BIRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • IREX. 2016. Serbia: Europe and Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2016. Available at: https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/pdf/media-sustainability-index-europe-eurasia-2016-full.pdf.pdf.

  • IRI Center for Insights in Survey Research. 2015. Survey of Public Opinion in Macedonia. Available at: http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/2015-11-19_survey_of_citizens_of_macedonia_september_29-october_5_2015.pdf.

  • Jović, D. 2008. Yugoslavia: The State That Withered Away. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, S. 2013. Europeanization, State-Building and Democratization in the Western Balkans. Nationalities Papers 41 (3): 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmezić, M. 2015a. The Judicial Academy as conditio sine qua non for the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Serbian Judiciary. European Public Law 21 (3): 509–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. The Western Balkans and EU Enlargement: Lessons Learned, Ways Forward and Prospects Ahead. European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. EU Rule of Law Promotion: Judiciary Reform in the Western Balkans. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmezić, M., and F. Bieber (eds.). 2017. The Crisis of Democracy in the Western Balkans. An Anatomy of Stabilitocracy and the Limits of EU Democracy Promotion. Belgrade/Graz: BiEPAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochenov, D. 2008. EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality. The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2004. EU External Governance in ‘Wider Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 680–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leino, P. 2002. Rights, Rules and Democracy in the EU Enlargement Process: Between Universalism and Identity. Austrian Review of International and European Law 7: 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, J. (ed.). 1991. Democracy and the Mass Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magen, A. 2007. Transformative Engagement Through Law. The Acquis Communitaire as Instrument of EU External Influence. European Journal of Law Reform 9 (3): 361–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Cracks in the Foundations: Understanding the Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (5): 1050–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magen, A., T. Risse, and M. McFaul. 2009. Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksić, T. 2015. Media Reform Stalled in the Slow Lane. Paris: World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. 2004. The Logic of Appropriateness. Arena Working Papers 04/09, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marušić, S.J. 2015. Macedonia Opposition: Transcripts Show ‘Staggering’ Interference in Courts. BIRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matić. J. 2016. Editors in Serbia: Closer to Owners than to Journalists. Southeast European Media Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelski, M. 2013. Does the EU Make a Difference? Judicial Reforms in South-Eastern Europe. In EU Enlargement and Europeanization in the Western Balkans, ed. A. Elbasani. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The EU’s Pathological Power: The Failure of External Rule of Law Promotion in South Eastern Europe. Southeastern Europe 39 (3): 318–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mijatović. D. 2015. State and Media in Southeastern Europe: From Crisis to Corruption, Public Lecture, Columbia University, New York (March 11).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia. 2011. The Strategy for the Development of the Public Information System in the Republic of Serbia until 2016, OJ, No. 75/2011. Belgrade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noutcheva, G. 2015. Societal Empowerment and Europeanization: Revisiting the EU’s Impact on Democratization. Journal of Common Market Studies 54: 691–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUNS round table. 2014. “Guilty Verdict for a Satirical Piece” on the conviction of Čačanske novine editor-in-chief Stojan Marković for defamation in a satirical piece in which politician Velimir Ilić recognized himself. Available at: http://www.nuns.rs/dosije/specijal7/01.jsp.

  • Päivi, L. 2002. Rights, Rules and Democracy in the EU Enlargement Process: Between Universalism and Identity. Austrian Review of International and European Law 7: 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pech, L. 2009. The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union. Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 04/09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radišić, D. 2015. Serbian Journalists Harassed by Police While Reporting on Controversial Belgrade Construction Site. Global Voice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reporters without Borders. 2017. European Standards Still Out of Reach. Available at: https://rsf.org/en/serbia.

  • Schimmelfennig, F. 2010. Europeanisation Beyond the Member States. Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften 8 (3): 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Europeanization Beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance 7 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2004. Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 661–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, U. 2006. Europeanization in New Member and Candidate States. Living Reviews in European Governance 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Europeanization in New Member and Candidate States. Living Reviews in European Governance 6 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. 1987. Political Theory and the Rule of Law. In The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology, ed. A. Hutchinson et al., 1–16. Toronto: Carswell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilov, D. 2006. EU Enlargement and the Constitutional Principle of Judicial Independence. In Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law? The Impact of EU Enlargement for the Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Legal Orders, ed. W. Sadurski, A. Czarnota, and M. Krygier, 312–334. Dodrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelkov, A. 2016. The EU and Rule of Law Promotion in Western Balkans—A New Role for Candidate States’ Parliaments. East European Politics 32: 505–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadić, M., and M. Šajkaš. 2016. Captured News Media: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro. Washington: Centre for International Media Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleski, D., M. Kmezić, and L. Pollozhani. 2016. Improving Checks and Balances in the Republic of Macedonia: Judicial Control of Executive. EPI Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tatham, F.A. 2009. Enlargement of the European Union. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index. 2017. Available at: https://www.bti-project.org/en/home/.

  • The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Recommendations of the Senior Experts’ Group on Systemic Rule of Law Issues Relating to the Communications Interception Revealed in Spring. 2015. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/news_corner/news/news-files/20150619_recommendations_of_the_senior_experts_group.pdf.

  • US State Department. 2014. Macedonia Human Rights Report. Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236762.pdf.

  • Vogel, T. 2015. Media Freedom and Integrity in the Western Balkans. EFB Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubek, R., and K.H. Goetz. 2010. Performing to Type? How State Institutions Matter in East Central Europe. Journal of Public Policy 30 (1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Kmezić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kmezić, M. (2019). EU Rule of Law Conditionality: Democracy or ‘Stabilitocracy’ Promotion in the Western Balkans?. In: Džankić, J., Keil, S., Kmezić, M. (eds) The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans. New Perspectives on South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91412-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics