Advertisement

EU Enlargement and State Capture in the Western Balkans

  • Milada Anna Vachudova
Chapter
Part of the New Perspectives on South-East Europe book series (NPSE)

Abstract

In 2018, the European Union (EU) enlargement process in the Western Balkans is at a crossroads. EU leaders have recommitted themselves to the process, but Western Balkan states in the membership queue are hobbled by the capture of the state by elites who favour rent-seeking and ethno-nationalist appeals over economic reform, media freedom and the rule of law. The EU’s renewed commitment is perhaps surprising given the democratic backsliding that has happened since 2010 in EU members that were once the front-runners of post-communist reform. In Hungary and Poland, the ascendance of rent-seeking elites who use ethno-nationalist appeals to legitimize the concentration of power has undermined liberal democracy—and in Hungary it has destroyed it. I argue in this chapter that for the EU there are nevertheless substantial geopolitical benefits including regional stability and democratic reform that motivate continued enlargement to the Western Balkan states. And for the candidates, there remain vast geopolitical and economic benefits of membership that continue to motivate at least uneven democratic reform, but sometimes falter also because the EU struggles with expertise, consistency and legitimacy in the pre-accession process. The conclusion reflects on how the illiberal turn inside the EU may shape enlargement going forward.

Bibliography

  1. Balkan Insight. 2013. Germany Pushes Serbia Hard on Kosovo, March 20. Available at: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/germany-pushes-serbia-to-normalise-relations-with-kosovo.
  2. Barlovac, B. 2012. Croatian Ex-PM Sanader Jailed for Ten Years. Balkan Insight, November 12. Available at: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/croatia-jails-sanader-for-10-years-over-graft.
  3. Bassuener, K., and B. Weber. 2013. House of Cards: The EU’s “Reinforced Presence” in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Democratization Policy Council, May. Available at: http://democratizationpolicy.org/images/policynote/may.pdf.
  4. Bieber, F. 2011. Building Impossible States? State-Building Strategies and EU Membership in the Western Balkans. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (10): 1783–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bieber, F. 2013. Is Change Coming to Bosnia? Reflections on Protests and Their Prospects. Available at: http://fbieber.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/is-change-coming-to-bosnia-reflections-on-protests-their-prospects/.
  6. Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2012. From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction. West European Politics 35 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimitrova, A. 2010. The New Member States of the EU in the Aftermath of Enlargement: Do New European Rules Remain Empty Shells? Journal of European Public Policy 17 (1): 137–148.Google Scholar
  8. Dolenec, D. 2013. Democratic Institutions and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  9. Džankić, J., and S. Keil. 2017. State-Sponsored Populism and the Rise of Populist Governance: The Case of Montenegro. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 19 (4): 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Džihić, V., and A. Wieser. 2011. Incentives for Democratisation? Effects of EU Conditionality on Democracy in Bosnia & Hercegovina. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (10): 1803–1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elbasani, A., and S. Šelo Sabić. (2017). Rule of Law, Corruption and Democratic Accountability in the Course of EU Enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy 24: 1–19.Google Scholar
  12. Epstein, R. 2008. In Pursuit of Liberalism: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Epstein, R. 2014. Overcoming ‘Economic Backwardness’ in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 17–34.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. 1999. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Stabilisation and Association Process for the Countries of South-Eastern Europe, COM (1999) 235 final, May 26.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. 2009. Five Years of an Enlarged Europe: Economic Achievements and Challenges. European Economy, No. 1/2009.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. 2013a. Monitoring Report on Croatia’s Accession Preparations, COM(2013) 171 final, March 26. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/fule/docs/news/20130326_report_final.pdf.
  17. European Commission. 2013b. “Steps Toward Joining,” Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/policy/steps-towards-joining/index_en.htm.
  18. European Commission. 2018. Communication from the Commission: A Credible Enlargement Perspective for and Enhanced EU Engagement with the Western Balkans, COM(2018) 65 final, February 6.Google Scholar
  19. European Council. 1997. Council Conclusions on the Application of Conditionality with a View to Developing a Coherent EU-Strategy for the Relations with the Countries of the Region, PRES/97/129, Annex 3, April 29.Google Scholar
  20. Ganev, V. 2013. Post-accession Hooliganism: Democratic Governance in Bulgaria and Romania after 2007. East European Politics & Societies 27 (1): 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grabbe, H. 2006. The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanisation through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopkins, V. 2012. Montenegro: Mafia State in the EU Neighborhood. Available at: http://www.opendemocracy.net/valerie-hopkins/montenegro-mafia-state-in-eu-neighbourhood.
  23. IPSOS Strategic Marketing IPSOS. 2013. Redovno mesečno istraživanje Maj 2013. Available at: http://www.ipsos.rs/aktuelno_maj.
  24. Jacoby, W. 2004. The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacoby, W. 2014. The EU Factor in Fat Times and in Lean: Did the EU Amplify the Boom and Soften the Bust? Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 52–70.Google Scholar
  26. Jović, D. 2012. The War That Is Not Allowed to be Forgotten: Nationalist Discourse on the ‘Homeland War’ in Contemporary Croatia. Suedosteuropa Mitteilungen 52 (3): 52–69.Google Scholar
  27. Judah, T. 2013. Germany and the Balkans: The Pivot in the Balkans’ EU Ambitions. The Economist Online, Eastern Approaches, February 26. Available at: http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2013/02/germany-and-balkans.
  28. Kacarska, S. 2018. The Europeanisation of Minority Policies in the Western Balkans. In The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans, this volume.Google Scholar
  29. Kelley, J. 2004. International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization 63 (3): 425–458.Google Scholar
  30. Kmezić, Marko. 2018. EU Rule of Law Conditionality: Democracy or ‘Stabilitocracy’ Promotion in the Western Balkans? In The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans, this volume.Google Scholar
  31. Kochenov, D. 2008. EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality: Pre-accession Conditionality in the Fields of Democracy and the Rule of Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  32. Konitzer, A. 2011. Speaking European: Conditionality, Public Attitudes and Pro-European Party Rhetoric in the Western Balkans. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (10): 1853–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lehne, S. 2013. Serbia-Kosovo Deal Should Boost the EU’s Western Balkans Policy. Carnegie Europe, April 23. Available at: http://carnegieeurope.eu/2013/04/23/serbia-kosovo-agreement-should-reenergize-eu-s-western-balkans-policy/g0q8#.
  34. Levitz, P., and G. Pop-Eleches. 2010. Why No Backsliding? The European Union’s Impact on Democracy and Governance before and after Accession. Comparative Political Studies 43 (4): 457–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mirel, P. 2018. The Western Balkans: Between Stabilization and Integration in the European Union. European Issues Policy Paper, Fondation Robert Schuman, No. 459, January 23.Google Scholar
  36. Moravcsik, A., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2009. Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In European Integration Theory, ed. A. Wiener and T. Diez, 67–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Moravcsik, A., and M.A. Vachudova. 2003. National Interests, State Power, and EU Enlargement. East European Politics and Societies 17 (1): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noutcheva, G. 2012. European Foreign Policy and the Challenges of Balkan Accession: Conditionality, Legitimacy and Compliance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Noutcheva, G. 2016. Societal Empowerment and Europeanization: Revisiting the EU’s Impact on Democratization. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plümper, T., and C.J. Schneider. 2007. Discriminatory European Union Membership and the Redistribution of Enlargement Gains. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (4): 568–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pop-Eleches, G. 2013. Learning from Mistakes: Romanian Democracy and the Hungarian Precedent. Newsletter of the European Politics and Society Section of the American Political Science Association, Winter.Google Scholar
  42. Reeker, P. 2013. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Political Accountability for a Euro-Atlantic Future. Address at the American University in Bosnia and Hezegovina, May 21.Google Scholar
  43. Schimmelfennig, F. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schimmelfennig, F. 2007. European Regional Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Transformation in Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies 21 (1): 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sedelmeier, U. 2005. Constructing the Path to Eastern Enlargement: The Uneven Policy Impact of EU Identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sedelmeier, U. 2012. Europeanisation After Accession: Leaders, Laggards, and Lock-in. West European Politics 35 (1): 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sedelemeier, U. 2014. Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union’s Measures Against Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 105–121.Google Scholar
  48. Šelo Šabić, S. 2003. State Building Under Foreign Supervision: Bosnia-Herzegovina 1996–2003. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, K.E. 2003. The Evolution and Application of EU Membership Conditionality. In The Enlargement of the European Union, ed. M. Cremona, 105–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spendzharova, A., and M.A. Vachudova. 2012. Catching Up? Consolidating Liberal Democracy After EU Accession. West European Politics 35 (1): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Štiks, I. 2013. We Are All in This Together: A Civic Awakening in Bosnia-Herzegovina. openDemocracy, June 12. Available at: http://www.opendemocracy.net/igor-Štiks/‘we-are-all-in-this-together’-civic-awakening-in-bosnia-herzegovina.
  52. Subotic, J. 2010. Europe Is a State of Mind: Identity and Europeanization in the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2): 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Subotic, J. 2012. The Past Is Not Yet Over: Remembrance, Justice and Security Community in the Western Balkans. Journal of Regional Security 1 (2): 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sweeney, J. 2010. Ireland and The EU’s Fifth Enlargement. In National Economic and Social Council (NESC) Report No. 122, Re-Finding Success in Europe: The Challenge for Irish Institutions and Policy. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.Google Scholar
  55. Vachudova, M.A. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration After Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vachudova, M.A. 2008. Tempered by the EU? Political Parties and Party Systems Before and After Accession. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 861–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vachudova, M.A. 2014. Eu Leverage and National Interests in the Balkans: The Puzzles of Enlargement Ten Years On. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations