Abstract
In many countries domesticated dogs occur abundantly on coasts, where they may co-occur with and pose a threat to coastal wildlife such as threatened shorebirds. Dogs on beaches fit the ecological definition of invasive species. The management of dogs on coasts is controversial, with polarised debate surrounding dog access to public open spaces, and questions around the effectiveness of prevailing dog management regulations. We examined the levels of compliance with dog regulations (3516 checks, 69 ocean beaches) under six prevailing management regimes in Victoria, Australia. Compliance was low to moderate across all dog management ‘types’, but varied significantly. The highest compliance rates were associated with ‘no dog’ areas. Despite poor overall compliance, dog regulations appeared to be associated with different rates of occurrence and relative abundances of dogs, suggesting either they effectively displaced dog walkers or that dog area designations reflect usage patterns, or both.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JR, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339
Burrell NS, Colwell MA (2012) Direct and indirect evidence that productivity of Snowy Plovers Charadrius nivosus varies with occurrence of a nest predator. Wild 62:204–223
Cohen SP (2002) Can pets function as family members? West J Nurs Res 24:621–638
Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers Distrib 10:135–141
Dowling B, Weston MA (1999) Managing a breeding population of the Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis in a high-use recreational environment. Bird Conserv Int 9:255–270
Forrest A, St Clair C (2006) Effects of dog leash laws and habitat type on avian and small mammal communities in urban parks. Urban Ecosyst 9:51–66
Glover HK, Weston MA, Maguire GS, Miller KK, Christie BA (2011) Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffers: Response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance. Landsc Urban Plan 103(3-4):326–334
Gompper M (2014) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hughes J, Macdonald DW (2013) A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biol Conserv 157:341–351
Iojă CI, Rozylowicz L, Pătroescu M, Niţă MR, Vânau GO (2011) Dog walkers vs. other park visitors perceptions: the importance of planning sustainable urban parks in Bucharest, Romania. Landsc Urban Plan 103:74–82
Johnston C, Briggs J, Wallace P (2013) Dog walking review – Mornington Peninsula National Park. Report to Parks Victoria. Context Consulting, Melbourne
Le Corre N, Gélinaud G, Brigand L (2009) Bird disturbance on conservation sites in Brittany (France): the standpoint of geographers. J Coast Conserv 13:109–118
Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2013) Invasion ecology. Wiley, Oxford
Maguire GS (2008) A practical guide to managing beach-nesting birds in Australia. Birds Australia report, Melbourne
Maguire GS, Miller KK, Weston MA, Young KA (2011) Being beside the seaside: beach use and preferences among coastal residents of South-Eastern Australia. Ocean Coast Manage 54:781–788
Maguire GS, Rimmer JM, Weston MA (2013) Stakeholder perceptions of threatened species and their management on urban beaches. Animals 3:1002–1020
McKenzie-Mohr D (2011) Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing, 3rd edn. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island
Miller KK, Ritchie E, Weston MA (2014) The human dimensions of dog-wildlife interactions. In: Gompper ME (ed) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 286–301
Morgan R (1999) Preferences and priorities of recreational beach users in Wales, United Kingdom. J Coastal Res 15:653–667
Ormsby AA, Forys EA (2010) The effects of an education campaign on beach user perceptions of beach nesting birds in Pinellas County, Florida. Hum Dimens Wildl 15:119–128
Pereira LCC, JA J’n, Medeiros C, Costa RM (2003) The influence of the environmental status of Casa Caiada and Rio Doce beaches (NE-Brazil) on beaches users. Ocean Coast Manage 46:1011–1030
Savolainen P, Leitner T, Wilton AN, Matisoo-Smith E, Lundeberg J (2004) A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. Proc Nat Acad Sci 101:12387–12390
Schlacher TA, Weston MA, Lynn D, Schoeman DS, Huijbers CM, Olds AD, Masters S, Connolly RM (2015) Conservation gone to the dogs: when canids rule the beach in small coastal reserves. Biodivers Conserv 24(3):493–509
Scrogin D, Boyle K, Parsons G, Plantinga AJ (2004) Effects of regulations on expected catch, expected harvest, and site choice of recreational anglers. Am J Agric Econ 86:963–974
Sterl P, Brandenburg C, Arnberger A (2008) Visitors’ awareness and assessment of recreational disturbance of wildlife in the Donau-Auen National Park. J Nat Cons 16:135–145
Teunissen W, Schekkerman H, Willems F, Majoor F (2008) Identifying predators of eggs and chicks of Lapwing Vanellus vanellus and Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa in the Netherlands and the importance of predation on wader reproductive output. Ibis 150:74–85
Valéry L, Fritz H, Lefeuvre JC, Simberloff D (2008) In search of a real definition of the biological invasion phenomenon itself. Biol Invasions 10:1345–1351
VSN International (2005) GenStat for Windows 7th Edition. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Web page: GenStat.co.uk
Walsh J (2011) Unleashed fury: the political struggle for dog-friendly parks. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette
Weston MA, Stankowich T (2014) Dogs as agents of disturbance. In: Gompper ME (ed) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 94–116
Weston MA, Antos M, Glover HK (2009) Birds, buffers and bicycles: a review and case study of wetland buffers. Vic Nat 126:79–86
Weston MA, Fitzsimons JA, Wescott G, Miller KK, Ekanayake KB, Schneider T (2014) Bark in the park: a review of domestic dogs in parks. Environ Manag 54:373–382
Williams KJH, Weston MA, Henry S, Maguire GS (2009) Birds and beaches, dogs and leashes: dog owners’ sense of obligation to leash dogs on beaches in Victoria Australia. Hum Dimens Wildl 14:89–101
Young JK, Olson KA, Reading RP, Amgalanbaatar S, Berger J (2011) Is wildlife going to the dogs? impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. Bioscience 61:125–132
Acknowledgements
Data were collected by BirdLife Australia and volunteers with the Beach-nesting Birds Program, funded by the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country program. This work was conducted under Deakin University Animal Ethics permit A45/2006 and Deakin University Human Ethics Exemption 2012-204. This work was supported by the Deakin University Centre for Integrative Ecology (CIE) and a School of Life and Environmental Sciences Collaborative Research Grant. Write-up was supported by the Beach Ecology And Conservation Hub (BEACH Venus Bay).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maguire, G.S., Miller, K.K., Weston, M.A. (2019). Only the Strictest Rules Apply: Investigating Regulation Compliance of Beaches to Minimize Invasive Dog Impacts on Threatened Shorebird Populations. In: Makowski, C., Finkl, C. (eds) Impacts of Invasive Species on Coastal Environments. Coastal Research Library, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91382-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91382-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91381-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91382-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)