Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a discipline that provides generic patterns that any organisation can reuse throughout its own business, informatics and technical components. However, EA’s current way of thinking and working to achieve this aim is not standardised. EA thus continues to “reinvent the wheel” that causes mistakes or wastes resources on rediscovering what should already be known. We, therefore, represent the specific business, information and technology meta-models as patterns that can be fully reintegrated in one repeatable meta-model for the whole organisation. The outcome is a new agile way of thinking and working, highlighted by how EA works better in enterprise layers, sub-layers and levels of abstraction. To test the meta-models, two forms of Conceptual Structures known as Conceptual Graphs (CGs) and Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) are brought together through the CGtoFCA algorithm. The algorithm identifies how the layered meta-models can share meaning and truth and without having to recombine them into one large, unwieldy meta-model as the repeatable structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
The table has the layers in columns not rows, and the levels in rows not columns. This layout allows the table to best fit on the page; it should be the other way round.
Andrews, S., Polovina, S.: Exploring, reasoning with and validating directed graphs by applying formal concept analysis to conceptual graphs. In: GKR 2017, Revised Selected Papers. LNAI, vol. 10775, pp. 3–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). http://www.springer.com/gb/book/9783319781013
The Open Group: 30. content metamodel (2018). http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf92-doc/arch/chap30.html
Oberle, D.: How ontologies benefit enterprise applications. Semant. Web J. 5(6), 473–491 (2014)
Polovina, S., Scheruhn, H.-J., von Rosing, M.: Modularising the complex meta-models in enterprise systems using conceptual structures. In: Developments and Trends in Intelligent Technologies and Smart Systems, pp. 261–283. IGI Global, Hershey (2018). ID: 189437
Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science. Ann. Rev. Info. Sci. Technol. 40(1), 521–543 (2006)
Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual graphs. In: Handbook of Knowledge Representation, Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 213–237. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)
von Rosing, M.: Using the business ontology to develop enterprise standards. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. (IJCSSA) 4(1), 48–70 (2016). ID: 171391
von Rosing, M., Urquhart, B., Zachman, J.A.: Using a business ontology for structuring artefacts: example - northern health. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. (IJCSSA) 3(1), 42–85 (2015). ID: 142900
Wei, B., Delugach, H.S., Colmenares, E., Stringfellow, C.: A conceptual graphs framework for teaching UML model-based requirements acquisition. In: 2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET), pp. 71–75, April 2016
Editors and Affiliations
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Polovina, S., von Rosing, M. (2018). Using Conceptual Structures in Enterprise Architecture to Develop a New Way of Thinking and Working for Organisations. In: Chapman, P., Endres, D., Pernelle, N. (eds) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning. ICCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10872. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91379-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91378-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91379-7