Interpreting Diagrammatic Reasoning – Between Empiricism and Realism

  • Michał SochańskiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10871)


Diagrams are frequently used in mathematics, not only in geometry but also in many other branches such as analysis or graph theory. However, the distinctive cognitive and methodological characteristics of mathematical practice with diagrams, as well as mathematical knowledge acquired using diagrams, raise some philosophical issues – in particular, issues that relate to the empiricism-realism debate in the philosophy of mathematics. On the one hand, it has namely been argued that some aspects of diagrammatic reasoning are at odds with the often assumed a priori nature of mathematical knowledge and with other aspects of the realist position in philosophy of mathematics. On the other hand, one can claim that diagrammatic reasoning is consistent with the realist epistemology of mathematics. Both approaches will be analyzed, referring to the use of diagrams in geometry as well as in other branches of mathematics.


Philosophy of mathematics Diagrammatic reasoning Epistemology 


  1. 1.
    Brown, J.R.: Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures. Routledge, London/New York (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coliva, A.: Human diagrammatic reasoning and seeing-as. Synthese 186, 121–148 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giaquinto, M.: Visual Thinking in Mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greaves, M.: The Philosophical Status of Diagrams. CSLI Publication, Stanford (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mancosu, P.: Philosophy of Mathematics & Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nikulin, D.: Imagination and Mathematics in Proclus. Anc. Philos. 28, 153–172 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Plato: The Republic. Basic Books, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Sherry, D.: The role of diagrams in mathematical arguments. Found. Sci. 14, 59–74 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shimojima, A.: Semantic Properties of Diagrams and Their Cognitive Potentials. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stenning, K.: Seeing reason: image and language in learning to think. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations