Hayek on Limited Democracy, Dictatorships, and the ‘Free’ Market: An Interview in Argentina, 1977

  • Birsen FilipEmail author
Part of the Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics book series (AIEE)


Hayek is highly-regarded for his contributions to the development of liberal thought, particularly his work on individual freedom, economic freedom, ‘spontaneous’ order, and limited state action. He also defended dictatorial regimes, provided that they were committed to achieving the conditions of a ‘free’ market economy at the expense of unlimited democracy. This chapter examines Hayek’s rationale for supporting certain types of dictatorial regimes, based largely on the views expressed in an interview published in the Argentinean weekly magazine, SOMOS while on a one-week visit to Argentina in 1977. At that time, ‘Dirty War’ Argentina was ruled by the administration of army commander General Jorge Rafael Videla. Hayek defined ‘the condition of freedom’ as ‘a state in which each can use his knowledge for his purposes’ so as to achieve individual goals free from intervention or coercion on the part of an external authority: ‘Coercion is evil precisely because it thus eliminates an individual as a thinking and valuing person and makes him a bare tool in the achievement of the ends of another.’ By defending the practice of relying on dictatorial regimes to achieve the conditions of a ‘free’ market economy, Hayek contradicted his own concept of freedom, which he defined as ‘absence of coercion.


  1. Backhouse, R. E. (2006). Hayek on Money and the Business Cycle. In E. Feser (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hayek (pp. 34–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corn, D. (1991, February 4). Beltway Bandits. The Nation.Google Scholar
  3. de Pablo, J. C. (1977). Los Economistas y la Economía Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Macchi.Google Scholar
  4. Farrant, A., & McPhail, E. (2014). Can a Dictator Turn a Constitution into a Can-Opener? F.A. Hayek and the Alchemy of Transitional Dictatorship in Chile. Review of Political Economy, 26(3), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farrant, A., & McPhail, E. (2017). Hayek, Thatcher, and the Muddle of the Middle. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part IX: The Divine Right of the ‘Free’ Market. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  6. Farrant, A., McPhail, E., & Berger, S. (2012). Preventing the “Abuses” of Democracy: Hayek, the “Military Usurper” and Transitional Dictatorship in Chile? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71(3), 513–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hayek, F. A. (1964 [1952]). The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  9. Hayek, F. A. (1978). Oral History Interviews. Los Angeles: Centre for Oral History Research, University of California.
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1982 [1973]). Law, Legislation and Liberty: Rules and Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. (1982 [1976]). Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Hayek, F. A. (1982 [1979]). Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Hayek, F. A. (2007 [1944]). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hayek, F. A. (2007 [1976]). Introduction. In J. Dingwall & B. F. Hoselitz (Trans.), Carl Menger, Principles of Economics (pp. 11–36). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Hayek, F. A. (2011 [1960]). The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition (R. Hamowy, Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heredia, M. (2016). Economic Ideas and Power During the Dictatorship. In H. Verbitsky & J. P. Bohoslavsky (Eds.), The Economic Accomplices to the Argentine Dictatorship (pp. 47–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Klor, E. F., Saiegh, S., & Satyanath, S. (2017, September). Cronyism in State Violence: Evidence from Labor Repression During Argentina’s Last Dictatorship.
  18. Lluch, A., & Salvaj, E. (2012). A Comparative Study of Interlocking Directorates at the End of the Import-Substituting Industrialization Period in Argentina and Chile. REDES (Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales), 2(3), 280–112.Google Scholar
  19. Schvarzer, J. (1986). La Política Económica de Martínez de Hoz. Buenos Aires: Hyspamérica.Google Scholar
  20. SOMOS. (1977, November 25). La inflación es la mayor amenaza contra la liberdad. 32–36.Google Scholar
  21. Tella, G., & Braun, C. R. (1990). Alvaro Alsogaray. In Argentina, 1946–83: The Economic Ministers Speak. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Trowbridge, S. (2001, September 5–9). The Role of Ideas in Neoliberal Economic Reform: The Case of Argentina. Washington, DC: Department of Government Harvard University For presentation at the Latin American Studies Association.
  23. Urtasum, M. (2008). Revista Somos, política y representación. Hologramática. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales (UNLZ). Año V, 8(4), 65–93.Google Scholar
  24. Videla, J. R. (1976, May). Discurso de Jorge R. Videla.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OttawaONCanada

Personalised recommendations