Abstract
Grading: This project will be graded on a 0–10-point scale. A grade of 0 will be awarded if the project is not handed in on time. A grade of 6 or above is a passing grade. Any student receiving a grade below 6 must make an appointment with his or her mentor to discuss this class. A retake opportunity can be looked at as a deadline extension, so please do not ask for an extension.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Kotovsky K, Hayes JR, Simon HA (1985) Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cogn Psychol 17(2):248–294
Bibliography
British Educational Research Association (2011) Ethical guidelines for education research. Retrieved from http://www.bbk.ac.uk/sshp/research/sshp-ethics-committee-and-procedures/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paquette, A. (2018). Appendices. In: Spatial Visualization and Professional Competence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91289-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91289-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91288-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91289-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)