Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical Framework and Proposed Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Open Innovation Business Modeling

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 2364 Accesses

Abstract

Setting out from the concept of “creative destruction” proposed by Schumpeter (1942), firms that are not innovative are replaced by those that are. An innovative firm is one that takes advantage of opportunities available in the surrounding environment, mobilizing both physical infrastructure and forms of demand-pull through new business which is intensive in incorporating knowledge, created by existing firms. To take advantage of those opportunities, both new and established firms must make additional investment in innovation in order to create new sources of spillovers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Kline and Rosenberg (1986), innovation is not gradual, linear or even well behaved. For these authors, bi-directional flows occur. On one hand, the supply of innovation promotes the development of science, and on the other, the demand for innovation forces the creation of science. It is of note that on various occasions, technical progress does not derive from science but rather from certain needs identified in the market.

References

  • Abdelkafi, N., Makhotin, S., & Posselt, T. (2013). Business model innovations for electric mobility—What can be learned from existing business model patterns? International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abernathy, W., & Utterback, J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achtenhagen, L., Melin, L., & Naldi, L. (2013). Dynamics of business models—strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Planning, 46, 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. (2003). Internet business models and strategies. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A. (2000). How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, R., & Zimmermann, H. (2001). Introduction to special section on business models. Electronic Markets, 11(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amburgey, T., & Rao, H. (1996). Organizational ecology: Past, present and future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1265–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Kupp, M. (2008). Serving the poor: Drivers of business model innovation in mobile. Information, 10, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, R., & Schiff, A. (2008). Promoting access to intellectual property: Patent pools, copyright collectives and clearinghouses. R&D Management, 38, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, L. (2001). Emerging e-business Models: Lessons from the Field, HBS No. 9-801-172. Harvard: Business School, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24, 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspara, J., Hietanen, J., & Tikkanen, H. (2010). Business model innovation vs. replication: Financial performance implications of strategic emphases. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspara, J., Lamberg, J.-A., Laukia, A., & Tikkanen, H. (2013). Corporate business model transformation and inter-organisational cognition: The case of Nokia. Long Range Planning, 46, 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagshaw, M., & Bagshaw, C. (2001). Co-opetition applied to training—a case study. Industrial and Commercial Training, 33(4/5), 175–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R., & Leitão, J. (2015). Entrepreneurship, human capital and regional development, International Studies in Entrepreneurship. USA: Springer . isbn:978-3-319-12870-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R., Karaöz, M., & Mendonça, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial backgrounds, human capital and start-up success. (Jena Economic Research Papers, #2007-045, pp. 1–39).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, P. (2009). An asymmetric perspective on coopetitive strategies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8(1), 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, R., & Radford, R. (2001). The business of innovation: Managing the corporate imagination for maximum results. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research policy, 33, 1477–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2), 157–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). Coopetition in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2003). Tension in co-opetition. Academy of Marketing Science Annual Conference, May 28–31, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, H., & Sandström, C. (2013). Business model innovation from an open systems perspective: Structural challenges and managerial solutions. International Journal of Product Development, 18, 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienstock, C., Gillenson, M., & Sanders, T. (2002). The complete taxonomy of web business models. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(2), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). Understanding management models. In N. Foss & T. Saebi (Eds.), Business model innovation: The organizational dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2012). Reinventing management. Smarter choices for getting work done. San Fransisco: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, A., Opsahl, T., George, G., & Gann, D. (2012). The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexibility during business model innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2014). Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 43, 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S., & Rossi, C. (2006). Entry strategies under competing standards: Hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Science, 52, 1085–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonel, E., & Rocco, E. (2007). Coopeting to survive: Surviving coopetition. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), 70–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of the art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken, R., & Fredrich, V. (2012). Coopetition: Performance implications and management antecedents. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(5), 12500281–125002828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken, R., & Kraus, S. (2013). Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2060–2070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken, R., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Management Science, 9(3), 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-opetition. Doubleday, New York: Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brolos, A. (2009). Innovative coopetition: The strength of strong ties. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8(1), 110–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, E., & Penard, T. (2006). The economics of digital business models: A framework for analyzing the economics of platforms. Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucherer, E., Eisert, U., & Gassmann, O. (2012). Towards systematic business model innovation: Lessons from product innovation management. Creativity & Innovation Management, 21, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camisón, C., & Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 707–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 464–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., & Valentini, G. (2016). Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1034–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52, 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M., & Valentini, G. (2009). Organising R&D projects to profit from innovation: Insights from co-opetition. Long Range Planning, 42(2), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiolato, J., & Lastres, H. (2005). Sistemas de inovação e desenvolvimento: as implicações de política. São Paulo em Perspectiva, 19(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante, S. (2014). Preparing for business model change: The ‘prestage’ finding. Journal of Management & Governance, 18, 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Schwartz, K. (2007). Innovating business models with co-development partnerships. Research & Technology Management, 50(1), 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43, 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Kim, S., & Agogino, A. (2014). Chez Panisse: Building an open innovation ecosystem. California Management Review, 56(4), 144–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2010). Unravelling the process from closed to open innovation: Evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries. R&D Management, 40(3), 222–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, T., & Peng, T. (2005). Competition and cooperation intensity in a network—A case study in Taiwan simulator industry. Journal of American Academy Business, 7, 150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, K., Chan, B., & Lam, P. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industry Management Data System, 108(4), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coriat, B., & Weinstein, O. (2002). Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Research Policy, 31(2), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corso, M., Martini, A., Paolucci, E., & Pellegrini, L. (2003). Knowledge management configurations in Italian small-to-medium enterprises. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucculelli, M., & Bettinelli, C. (2015). Business models, intangibles and firm performance: Evidence on corporate entrepreneurship from Italian manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagnino, G., & Rocco, E. (2009). Coopetition strategy: Theory, experiments and cases. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J., Kock, S., & Lundgren, E.-L. (2016). Conceptualizing coopetition strategy as practice: A multilevel interpretative framework. International Studies of Management and Organization, 46, 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L., O’Mahony, S., & Gann, D. (2016). One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, L., Etemad, H., & Wright, R. (2008). Toward a paradigm of symbiotic entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 5(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Reuver, M., Bouwman, H., & MacInnes, I. (2009). Business models dynamics for start-ups and innovating e-businesses. International Journal of Electronic Business, 7, 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. (2014). Creating and capturing value from external knowledge: The moderating role of knowledge intensity. R&D Management, 44(3), 248–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshler, R., & Smith, K. (2011). Making business model innovation stick. People & Strategy, 34(4), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devezas, T., Leitão J., & Sarygulov, A. (2017), Industry 4.0 – Entrepreneurship and structural change in the new digital landscape, Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer isbn:978-3-319-49603-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dmitriev, V., Simmons, G., Truong, Y., Palmer, M., & Schneckenberg, D. (2014). An exploration of business model development in the commercialization of technology innovations. R&D Management, 44(3), 306–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 221–238). London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M., Roering, W., Carlin, B., & Wisnieski, J. (1996). Multifaceted relationships under coopetition description and theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1994, September–October). Theory of the business. Harvard Business Review (pp 95–106), Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, R., Palmer, I., & Benviste, J. (2010). Business model replication for early and rapid internationalisation: The ING direct experience. Long Range Planning, 43(5/6), 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., & Mitchell, W. (2000). Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2005, February). Business 2010: Embracing the challenge of change. White paper, Economist Intelligence Unit, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T. (2006). Internet companies’ growth strategies: Determinants of investment intensity and long-term performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1183–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enberg, C. (2012). Enabling knowledge integration in coopetitive R&D projects—the management of conflicting logics. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 771–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel, E., & Mezger, F. (2013). Imitation processes and their application for business model innovation: An explorative study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel, E., Heil, S., Hengstler, M., & Wirth, H. (2016). Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? Technovation, 60, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppler, M., & Hoffman, N. (2012). Does method matter? An experiment on collaborative business model idea generation in teams. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 388–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppler, M., Hoffmann, N., & Bresciani, S. (2011). New business models through collaborative idea generation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(6), 1323–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., & Johnson, R. (2013). Tools for managing early-stage business model innovation. Research Technology Management, 56(5), 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiet, J., & Patel, P. (2008). Forgiving business models for new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N., & Saebi, T. (2015). Business models and business model innovation: Bringing organization into the field. In N. Foss & T. Saebi (Eds.), Business model innovation: The organizational dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N., & Saebi, T. (2016). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come? And where should we go? Journal of Management, 43, 200–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N., Laursen, K., & Pedersen, T. (2011). Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organization Science, 22(4), 980–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger, K., Weiblen, T., Csik, M., & Gassmann, O. (2013). The 4I-framework of business model innovation: A structured view on process phases and challenges. International Journal of Product Development, 18(3), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1979). The determinants of innovation. Futures, 11, 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A., & McGahan, A. (2010). Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house basic research. Research Policy, 21(5), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Morales, V., Bolívar-Ramosa, M., & Martín-Rojasb, R. (2015). Technological variables and absorptive capacity’s influence on performance through corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1468–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Morales, V., Jiménez Barrionuevo, M., & Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1040–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Morales, V., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Lloréns-Montes, F. (2007). Effects of technology absorptive capacity and technology proactivity on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination. Technology Analysis & Strategy Management, 19(4), 527–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garraffo, F. (2002). Types of coopetition to manage emerging technologies. In 2nd Annual Conference, Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gast, J., Filser, M., Gundolf, K., & Kraus, S. (2015). Coopetition research: Towards a better understanding of past trends and future directions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 24(4), 492–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., & Bock, A. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 83–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. (2003). The evolution of new markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giesen, E., Berman, S., Bell, R., & Blitz, A. (2007). Three ways to successfully innovate your business model. Strategy & Leadership, 35(6), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girotra, K., & Netessine, S. (2013). Business model innovation for sustainability. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15(4), 537–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girotra, K., & Netessine, S. (2014). Four paths to business model innovation. Harvard Business Review, 92(7/8), 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D., & Park, B. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D., & Park, B. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J. (2002). Value-based requirements engineering–Exploring innovative and commerce ideas. Amsterdam: Nl, Vrije Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, M., Corvello, V., Mauro, A., & Scarmozzino, E. (2017). A systematic literature review on intangible assets and open innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-016-0041-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günzel, F., & Holm, A. (2013). One size does not fit all—Understanding the front-end and backend of business model innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 1340002-1–1340002-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanen, T. (2014). Co-creating integrated solutions within business networks: The KAM team as knowledge integrator. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(7), 1195–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N., & Wagner, M. (2012). Integrating sustainability into firms’ processes: Performance effects and the moderating role of business models and innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the revolution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., & Nohria, N. (2004). How to build collaborative advantage. Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C., Keinz, P., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Planning, 44(5-6), 344–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H.-C., Lai, M.-C., Lin, L.-H., & Chen, C.-T. (2013). Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26, 977–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S.-W., & Chang, C.-C. (2012). A co-opetition perspective of technology alliance governance modes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(7), 679–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and develop. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M. (1998). Technology integration: Making critical choices in a dynamic world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Global Business Services Survey. (2006). Expanding the innovation Horizon: The global CEO study 2006. Accessed in October 2016 from: http://www-07.ibm.com/sg/pdf/global_ceo_study.pdf.

  • Isenberg, D. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H., & Nishino, K. (2010). Killing two birds with one stone: Profit for now and learning for the future. Long Range Planning, 43(2010), 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janszen, F. (2000). The age of innovation: Making business creativity a competence. Not a coincidence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity based approach. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., & Chen, J. (2000). Integrated innovation patterns. Management of Science and Research (Chinese Journal), 21(5), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., Christensen, C., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, J., & Marsili, O. (2006). The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms. Research Policy, 35, 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R. (2002). New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 995–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001). Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30(5), 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keinz, P., Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2012). Designing the organization for user-driven innovation. Journal of Organizational Design, 1(3), 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., & Oshri, I. (2014). Business model renewal and ambidexterity: Structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a Cloud business model. R&D Management, 44, 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. (2001). Absorptive capacity, co-opetition, and knowledge creation: Samsung’s leapfrogging in semiconductors. In I. Nonaka & T. Nishiguchi (Eds.), Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation (pp. 281–297). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Min, S. (2015). Business model innovation performance: When does adding a new business model benefit an incumbent? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1), 34–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Lakhani, K. (2011). The contingent effect of absorptive capacity: An open innovation analysis. Harvard Business School Working Paper: 11–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum, R. (2005). Open innovation in practice. Research Technology Management, 48(4), 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Laudau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen, P., Bertels, H., & Elsum, M. (2011). The three faces of business model innovation: Challenges for established firms. Research Technology Management, 54, 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12, 1335–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1961). The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis, 52(168), 161–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P., Balaji, R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 863–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão, J. & Baptista, R. (2009), Public policies for fostering entrepreneurship: A European Perspective, Series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship, 22, Springer, July 2009., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitão, J., & Baptista, R. (2011). Inward FDI and ICT: Are they a joint technological driver of entrepreneurship? International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, 10(3/4), 268–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão, J., Alves, H., Krueger, N., & Park, J. (Eds.). (2018). Entrepreneurial, innovative and sustainable ecosystems—Best practices and implications for quality of life, Applying Quality of Life Research: Best Practices. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M., Loebbecke, C., & Powell, P. (2003). SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: The role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2011). Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Chinese state-owned high-tech enterprises. World Development, 39(7), 1240–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R., Che, R., & Ting, C. (2012). Turning knowledge management into innovation in the high-tech industry. Industrial Management & Data System, 112(1), 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, J., & Cantrell, S. (2001). Changing Business Models: Surveying the landscape (Working Paper, Accenture Institute for Strategic Change).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. (2013). Cooperation, competition and coopetition in innovation communities. Prometheus, 31(2), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, A., & Roper, S. (2016). Absorptive capacity and ambidexterity in R&D: Linking technology alliance diversity and firm innovation. European Management Review, 13, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12074:1740-4762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Slotegraaf, R. (2006). Cross-functional coopetition: The simultaneous role of cooperation and competition within firms. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Rindfleisch, A., & Tse, D. (2007). Working with rivals: The impact of competitor alliances in financial performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2004). A coopetition perspective of MNC-host government relations. Journal of International Management, 10(4), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for Internet-based e-commerce: An anatomy. California Management Review, 42(4), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive Innovation: In need of better theory’. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. (2008). Game-changing strategies: How to create new market space in established industries by breaking the rules. New York: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-de Castro, G. (2015). Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. (2010). Business models: A discovery-driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger, F. (2014). Toward a capability-based conceptualization of business model innovation: Insights from an explorative study. R&D Management, 44, 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., & Coles, C. (2004). Business model innovation breakthrough moves. Journal of Business Strategy, 25, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., & Coles, C. (2003). The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 24, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Creation and implementation of a new business model: A disarming case study. Management, 13, 266–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monitor Group. (2009). Paths to prosperity: Promoting entrepreneurship in the 21st century. Monitor Group, Accessed in October 2016, http://www.compete.monitor.com/App_Themes/MRCCorpSite_v1/DownloadFiles/NED_re port_final.pdf.

  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur.s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S., & Marquis, D. (1969). Successful industrial innovation: A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. Washington DC: National Science Foundation, NSF 69-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of the firm. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, M., & Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6-7), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noblet, J., Simon, E., & Parent, R. (2011). Absorptive capacity: A proposed operationalization. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9, 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N. (1999). Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 308–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omidvar, O. (2013). Revisiting absorptive capacity: Literature review and a practice-based extension of the concept. 35th DRUID Celebration Conference 2013, Barcelona, Spain, 17–19, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. (2004), The business model ontology—A proposition in a design science approach. Dissertation 173, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padula, G., & Dagnino, G. (2007). Untangling the rise of coopetition. International Studies and Management & Organization, 37(2), 32–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Russo, M. (1996). When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science, 42(6), 875–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin-Boucher, E., Le Roy, F., & Guräu, C. (2013). Coopetitive strategies in the ICT sector: Typology and stability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, D., & Leitão, J. (2016). Absorptive capacity, coopetition and product innovation: Contrasting Italian and Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 71(1/2), 10–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petroni, G., Venturini, K., & Verbano, C. (2011). Open innovation and new issues in R&D organization and personnel management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(1), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohle, G., & Chapman, M. (2006). IBM’s global CEO report 2006: Business model innovation matters. Strategy & Leadership, 34, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pynnonen, M., Hallikas, J., & Ritala, P. (2012). Managing customer-driven business model innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qingrui, X., Chen, J., Xie, Z., Liu, J., Zheng, G., & Wang, Y. (2007). Total innovation management: A novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1-2), 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), 927–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappa M. (2001). Business models on the web. Accessed in October 2016, http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html

  • Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2015). Open innovation 2.0: Is co-creation the ultimate challenge? International Journal of Technology Management, 69(1), 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M. (2013). Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy. Energy Policy, 62, 1226–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009). What’s in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation, 29(12), 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2013). Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition—the role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, F., Souza, V., & Leitão, J. (2011). Strategic Coopetition of Global Brands: A game theory approach to ‘Nike + iPod Sport Kit’ Co-branding. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 3(4), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F., & Alexandre, M. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science Archive, 20(4), 759–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial innovation and public policy. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P., & Yami, S. (2009). Managing strategic innovation through coopetition. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8(1), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusko, R. (2011). Exploring the concept of coopetition: A typology for the strategic moves of the Finnish forest industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salge, T., Bohne, T., Farchi, T., & Piening, E. (2012). Harnessing the value of open innovation: The moderating role of innovation management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(03), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, A., Criscuolo, P., & ter Wal, A. (2014). Coping with open innovation: Responding to the challenges of external engagement in R&D. California Management Review, 56(2), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvetat, D., Géraudel, M., & D’Armagnac, S. (2013). Interorganizational knowledge management in a coopetitive context in the aeronautic and space industry. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 11(3), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, P., & Ricart, J. (2010). Business model innovation and sources of value creation in low-income markets. European Management Review, 7, 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Sellero, P., Rosell-Martíneza, J., & García-Vázquez, J. (2014). Absorptive capacity from foreign direct investment in Spanish manufacturing firms. International Business Review, 23(2), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J., Spector, B., & Van der Heyden, L. (2009). Toward a theory of business model innovation within incumbent firms (INSEAD Working Papers #16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J., Spector, B., & van der Heyden, L. (2015). Toward a theory of business model change. In N. Foss & T. Saebi (Eds.), Business model innovation: The organizational dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 134–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1911). The theory of economic development, 1934 translation. New Jersey: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (5th ed.). London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (2001). 24/7 Innovation: A blueprint for surviving and thriving in an age of change. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikimic, U., Chiesa, V., Frattini, F., & Scalera, V. (2016). Investigating the influence of technology inflows on technology outflows in open innovation processes: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 652–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M., & Leitão, J. (2009). Cooperation in innovation practices among firms in Portugal: Do external partners stimulate innovative advances? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 7(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, W. (1928). O capitalismo moderno. Munique and Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorescu, A., Frambach, R., Singh, J., Rangaswamy, A., & Bridges, C. (2011). Innovations in retail business models. Journal of Retailing, 87, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodriguez, R., & Velamuri, S. (2010). Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse Case. Long Range Planning, 43, 383–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, N., & Foss, N. (2009). Opportunities and new business models: Transaction cost and property rights perspectives on entrepreneurship. In J. Nickerson & B. Silverman (Eds.), Economic Institutions of Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management (Vol. 26, pp. 67–96). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. (2005). O Quadrante de Pasteur: a ciência básica e a inovação tecnológica. Campinas: Unicamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storbacka, K., Frow, P., Nenonen, S., & Payne, A. (2012). Designing business models for value creation. Review of Marketing Research, 9, 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigre, P. (1998). Inovação e teorias da firma em três paradigmas. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 3, 67–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigre, P. (2005). Paradigmas tecnológicos e teorias econômicas da firma. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 4(1), 187–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tikkanen, H., Lamberg, J.-A., Parvinen, P., & Kallunki, J.-P. (2005). Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Management Decision, 43(6), 789–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of coopetition within a multiunit organization, competition and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, R. (2002). Driving growth through innovation: How leading firms are transforming their futures. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., Hitt, M., & Semadeni, M. (2006). Market value effects of acquisitions involving Internet firms: A resource-based analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 899–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Management, 36(3), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M., & Romme, A. (2012). Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems: Evidence from a field study. R&D Management, 42(2), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, H. (2007). Open innovation—the Dutch treat: Challenges in thinking in business models. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6(2), 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasudeva, G., & Anand, J. (2011). Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolio. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Garcia, A., & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2008). Analyzing the determinants of firm’s absorptive capacity. R&D Management, 38(4), 392–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velu, C., & Jacob, A. (2014). Business model innovation and owner-managers: The moderating role of competition. R&D Management, 46(3), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visnjic Kastalli, I., & Van Looy, B. (2013). Servitization: Disentangling the impact of service business model innovation on manufacturing firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 31, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., & Tekie, E. (2004). The wheel of business model reinvention: How to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors. Journal of Change Management, 4, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H., Foss, N., & Lyles, M. (2010). Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21, 931–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2016). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley, K. (2007). Coopetition—an introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Z., Yang, D., Sun, B., & Gu, M. (2014). The fit between technological innovation and business model design for firm growth: Evidence from China. R&D Management, 44, 288–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., Malone, T., D’Urso, V., Herman, G., & Woerner, S. (2005). Do some business models perform better than others? A study of the 1000 largest US firms. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper N.º226, Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (2001). We are all innovators. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, & I. Somerville (Eds.), Leading for innovation: And organizing for results (pp. 11–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S., & Göttel, V. (2016). Business Models: Origin, development and future research. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Strategic development of business models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the Internet. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., & Dana, L. P. (2003). Changing paradigms of international entrepreneurship strategy. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1, 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, A., & Voss, H. (2015). When does absorptive capacity matter for international performance of firms? Evidence from China. International Business Review, 24(2), 344–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., & Chen, Z. (2001). The basic law and pattern of firm’s business management. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Chen, J., & Guo, B. (1997). A theoretic model and an empirical analysis of technology innovation portfolio. Science and Research Management (Chinese Journal), 18(3), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & Hayton, J. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The Business Model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NECE, Research Center in Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal

    João Leitão

Authors
  1. João Leitão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leitão, J. (2019). Theoretical Framework and Proposed Model. In: Open Innovation Business Modeling. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91282-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation